I am in the same boat.
Since I do not need it desperately for the time being, I have been patiently waiting for the update.
It has been rumored that the update can be as early as this wednesday.
The advice is: Wait for the update as you can!
My reasoning for waiting would be that the new intel i chips will remain supported by accessory hardware and software for several years longer than the old core2duo's. The c2d is at the end of its life and within three or four years you will find that the "latest" version of your softwares was not built to run on the old machine. The "i" generation of intel chips is new enough that I think it's safe to say that for six or seven years you will be able to run any software that is released, including operating system upgrades. The future will require quad core performance and hyper-threading that c2d can never attain.
But if you only need the machine for a few years, plan to upgrade to a newer more powerful model and are willing to not see much return on your mini investment, by all means today's mini is a fine piece of work that will serve your purposes well I am sure.
I am typing this from a G5 Mac Pro (power mac) that was hot when it was new- two 2.0 PPC chips! I am also stuck on Mac OS 10.5.8 , using older versions of software because current versions are not supported by my hardware. But my machine is also seven years old and ready for upgrade. I would be less satisfied were it only a two or three year old model.. hence I will wait for the intel i5 or i7 to upgrade if I choose the mini.![]()
I am typing this from a G5 Mac Pro (power mac) that was hot when it was new- two 2.0 PPC chips!
The mini is now backordered at BestBuy with estimated 1-2 weeks for shipping. Might be something to consider...![]()
Back to shipping in 24hrs now![]()
Mine showed backordered: shipping in 1-2 weeks just now.
CPUs suitable for next Mac Pro aren't due for release till Q4 this year. There have been rumours of a change in Mac Pro design.
Mac Mini needs a move to Sandy Bridge. Obviously as this is the entry-level offering Apple would be inclined to do this after the other Mac products (except for the Mac Pro).
One thing that I've been wondering about since WWDC is Apple's overall desktop lineup. They said at the WWDC that Mac sales were 3/4ths notebooks and 1/4 desktops. With the numbers skewing more and more in the favor of notebooks, maybe the desktop lineup will be trimmed. Since the iMacs were just updated they're safe, but both the Mac Pros and the Mac mini are getting long in the tooth with not even a rumor of an update. Thoughts?
Apple has high price high profit Mac models they tend to update first. After they've sold a bunch of those, they slowly update the lower price lower profit models. It's been going on for years. At least it's somewhat predictable.I hate these kinds of labels, like "entry level". I've been using Macs for 18-years, but I'm thinking of getting a Mac mini as my next Mac what makes that "entry level"? I also don't understand why the Mac mini and MacBook have to wait until the other Macs are updated. If I need a Mac Pro, I'm not going to buy a Mac mini, or if I need a MacBook Pro I'm not going to buy a MacBook, so why keep everyone waiting? I think people are going to buy what they want and that Apple would sell more Macs if they updated the entire lineup (when possible) at the same time.
One thing that I've been wondering about since WWDC is Apple's overall desktop lineup. They said at the WWDC that Mac sales were 3/4ths notebooks and 1/4 desktops. With the numbers skewing more and more in the favor of notebooks, maybe the desktop lineup will be trimmed. Since the iMacs were just updated they're safe, but both the Mac Pros and the Mac mini are getting long in the tooth with not even a rumor of an update. Thoughts?