Why does it seem interesting?It seems like a pain in the arse for little gain.
Are there even any Macs which shipped with Tiger that support ML?
Little gain? It has the beauty of the Ui that Leopard and Lion had, the speed that Snow Leopard had and the new features that Mountain Lion will have. It's a huge upgrade.
And I'm sure there are 64 bit macs that can run tiger and mountain lion.
There is no Mac that was released with Tiger that will support Mountain Lion. The OP didn't do his homework prior to posting.
Actually my iMac mid 2007 came with tiger and is upgradable to Mountain Lion...![]()
Actually my iMac mid 2007 came with tiger and is upgradable to Mountain Lion...![]()
Anyone tried it? Seems like an interesting upgrade path.
To my knowledge, no Mac that was sold during the time of Tiger would support Mountain Lion. They might, and probably will, with some hacks, i.e. adding in necessary kexts, but a standard install won't work.
Heck, very few Macs that were sold during the time of Leopard even support Mountain Lion.
There is no Mac that was released with Tiger that will support Mountain Lion. The OP didn't do his homework prior to posting.
My 2007 MacBook Pro came with Tiger installed it supports Mountain Lion.
Do your research
----------
Wrong.
Who would have skipped 3 Upgrades?
Actually my iMac mid 2007 came with tiger and is upgradable to Mountain Lion...![]()
Who would have skipped 3 Upgrades?
Is your question just hypothetical or are you looking to do this? I think the number of people with Intel Macs still running Tiger would be absolutely minuscule.
My 2007 MacBook Pro came with Tiger installed… it supports Mountain Lion.
Do your research…
----------
Wrong.