Ha, asking me to specify "exactly what I mean by red" is contrary to my intended usage. I'm loosely using it (in devil's advocacy) to encompass socialists, communists (Marxist, Leninist, Stalinist, Maoist, etc.), and even some of the more liberal liberals (this is US liberals, mind you, not the socialism of Europe, which is almost undoubtedly included). It probably includes anyone who supports a tax differential of more than 30% (between the just-above-poverty and super-high income). Definitely includes those who support extensive welfare systems.
I don't have a problem with groups forming to protect themselves, however I do believe that unions have in many senses hurt themselves by demanding too much. The working class complains about outsourcing jobs internationally, but to a small degree it's their fault. I don't expect American workers to work for $10/week, but I don't think they should moan and groan when they don't get the $$/hr for a factory-line job. They need to at least try to be competitive if they want to keep their jobs.
I'm a proponent of strong capitalism with few (but never no) governmental regulations. I strongly oppose governmental interference with privacy and personal life (pro-gun, pro-choice, when economically profitable pro-death penalty, pro-gay civil union, anti-stop light cameras, anti-illegal wiretaps), however I have a soft spot for counter-terrorism efforts.
I don't want us to diverge from the original topic (which I find interesting) too much, so I'll suggest we end this side-topic (unless you want to open a new thread).
Please keep in mind I use "red" in a joking fashion, partly mockery of myself, partly of others (i.e. strict libertarian/creationist stereotypes), and so I'm not too accepting of people taking me seriously. I have a hard time tolerating stupidity (not ignorance, stupidity).