Apple cutting chip orders for iPhone14?
If true, it makes me wonder if Intel would try to move in and hoover up excess capacity, especially at a discount.
Intel may have pulled a fast one on its industry rivals by buying up a majority of the 3nm node capacity at TSMC in order to fabricate its new GPU and a number of server chips, something that could inhibit AMD and Apple from ramping up production of their own next-gen chips in 2022.
Sensationalism tends to lead people into wrong conclusions. Like the OP.Well, it’s summer, so naturally it’s time for *yearly* “Apple cutting orders of the next device not yet announced stories.
Seriously, a few years back I assembled a collection of the previous 5 or so years pointing out that this story runs every. ****ing. year. But this site and members seem to fall for it every time.
The problem is we are on the cusp of a recession and electronics are the first things to be on the downturn.Crazy how analysts were predicting chip shortage will take years to recover, and Intel said to last into 2024
Yet were are still in early 2H 2022 and not only it did recover, but we have supply glut problem.
Not surprised.Crazy how analysts were predicting chip shortage will take years to recover, and Intel said to last into 2024
Yet were are still in early 2H 2022 and not only it did recover, but we have supply glut problem.
Apparently they are delaying Intel 4 too. That means they will be stuck 10nm++++ for another year or so.So, now it looks like Intel won't be ready to use TSMCs 3nm process and will pay a penalty to TSMC.
Maybe further allowing Apple to swoop in and buy Intel's wafer scheduling to build more M3 on the cheap then pass the savings onto consumers?
If that's true, then likely Apple will try to push M2 Pro/Max into 3nm.So, now it looks like Intel won't be ready to use TSMCs 3nm process and will pay a penalty to TSMC.
Maybe further allowing Apple to swoop in and buy Intel's wafer scheduling to build more M3 on the cheap then pass the savings onto consumers?
That’s absurd. You can’t just move to a new node overnight. Apple’s TSMC N3 plans have been in place for years at this point.If that's true, then likely Apple will try to push M2 Pro/Max into 3nm.
TSMC hoped to have the 3nm node ready by spring of this year, so it would make sense that Apple would have designed the M2 for 3nm.That’s absurd. You can’t just move to a new node overnight. Apple’s TSMC N3 plans have been in place for years at this point.
TSMC hoped to have the 3nm node ready by spring of this year, so it would make sense that Apple would have designed the M2 for 5nm and 3nm.
View attachment 2028048
The future of leading-edge chips according to TSMC: 5nm, 4nm, 3nm and beyond
TSMC details process technologies that will be used for billions of chipswww.techradar.com
Perhaps because so many people upgraded their computers to support WFH/Remote learning during the COVID lockdowns.Almost all major clients of TSMC attempted to reduce manufacturing amount so this is not only an Apple thing but industry wide thing. Usually Q3 is a strong quarter for electronics, but we are having a lower-than-expected demand this year.
Just for the record, when you start to design a chip, it is tied to a specific node. You don’t start to work on 5nm and then say, nah, let’s just shrink it down to 3nm and carry on. Also, I would be shocked if at least the M2 Max isn’t being done on 3nm - otherwise I don’t think it will be good enough for the Mac Pro or big enough of an upgrade, but we will see.If that's true, then likely Apple will try to push M2 Pro/Max into 3nm.
I'd be surprised if any of the M2s are on 3nm. This is because M2 is based on the A15 which uses 5nm. The M2 itself uses 5nm as well. So if the M2 Max is on 3nm, that means Apple had to redesign the A15 to use 3nm, which obviously has different design rules.Just for the record, when you start to design a chip, it is tied to a specific node. You don’t start to work on 5nm and then say, nah, let’s just shrink it down to 3nm and carry on. Also, I would be shocked if at least the M2 Max isn’t being done on 3nm - otherwise I don’t think it will be good enough for the Mac Pro or big enough of an upgrade, but we will see.
Good point regarding the A15 and 5nm, but on the other hand: I really don’t think making M2 Max on 5nm will be enough of a jump to be worthwhile for anything when Apple can make that on 3nm in the start of 2023.I'd be surprised if any of the M2s are on 3nm. This is because M2 is based on the A15 which uses 5nm. The M2 itself uses 5nm as well. So if the M2 Max is on 3nm, that means Apple had to redesign the A15 to use 3nm, which obviously has different design rules.
It's possible that one of the M2 will be on 3nm. I think it's far more likely that M3 gets released in 3nm instead of any of the M2.
It's not if testing was done on both 5nm and 3nm.That’s absurd. You can’t just move to a new node overnight. Apple’s TSMC N3 plans have been in place for years at this point.
that's not how it works. When you design a chip, it's for a specific node, say 5nm and you ue the PDK (Process Development kit) that comes with that process. when done with design, you create a mask set to run actually wafers in the fab, those masksets are for 5nm. If you were "switching to 3nm, you basically have to start from scratch. now using the PDK for 3nm ... masksets for 5nm are rumored to be in the $10M range, 3nm masksets are rumored to be closer to $100M. So you're dealing with some heavy expenditures here and don't change plans midway thru ...It's not if testing was done on both 5nm and 3nm.