Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
TSMS makes Intel's GPUs and some of its server chips, but not its desktop chips.
Intel may have pulled a fast one on its industry rivals by buying up a majority of the 3nm node capacity at TSMC in order to fabricate its new GPU and a number of server chips, something that could inhibit AMD and Apple from ramping up production of their own next-gen chips in 2022.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: JPack and jdb8167
Could be one of the reason M2 is still on 5nm (would it get this hot if it was 3nm?, everyone and their granny is using TSMC these days. It makes for interesting watching thats for sure :)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jdb8167
Well, it’s summer, so naturally it’s time for *yearly* “Apple cutting orders of the next device not yet announced stories.

Seriously, a few years back I assembled a collection of the previous 5 or so years pointing out that this story runs every. ****ing. year. But this site and members seem to fall for it every time.
 
Crazy how analysts were predicting chip shortage will take years to recover, and Intel said to last into 2024

Yet were are still in early 2H 2022 and not only it did recover, but we have supply glut problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: satcomer
Almost all major clients of TSMC attempted to reduce manufacturing amount so this is not only an Apple thing but industry wide thing. Usually Q3 is a strong quarter for electronics, but we are having a lower-than-expected demand this year.
 
We’re on the cusp of a recession that could be nasty. Purchases on things like consumer electronics will be the first to slow down.
 
It's not exactly a guess anymore, pretty much everyone in the semi industry is seeing lower demand.


If you've been shopping for a TV recently, you'll noticed they're cheaper now than ever before due to contracting TV/PC demand for LCD panels.

 
  • Like
Reactions: kvic
It seems like the semiconductor industry has been built on price cuts (smaller processes giving more transistors per $) and market growth. Both of those fundamentals are being challenged, with (as I understand it) smaller processes costing the same per transistor as older processes, plus a looming recession.

Yeah, I think it's choppy waters ahead for TSMC and many others.
 
Well, it’s summer, so naturally it’s time for *yearly* “Apple cutting orders of the next device not yet announced stories.

Seriously, a few years back I assembled a collection of the previous 5 or so years pointing out that this story runs every. ****ing. year. But this site and members seem to fall for it every time.
Sensationalism tends to lead people into wrong conclusions. Like the OP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: satcomer
Crazy how analysts were predicting chip shortage will take years to recover, and Intel said to last into 2024

Yet were are still in early 2H 2022 and not only it did recover, but we have supply glut problem.
The problem is we are on the cusp of a recession and electronics are the first things to be on the downturn.
 
Crazy how analysts were predicting chip shortage will take years to recover, and Intel said to last into 2024

Yet were are still in early 2H 2022 and not only it did recover, but we have supply glut problem.
Not surprised.

Interest rates increased faster than anticipated. People went back outside and spent more money on experiences and less on electronics. When people go outside, they spend less time on the internet which means less demand for servers.

Now that we're on our way to a recession, businesses will reduce chip orders.
 
So, now it looks like Intel won't be ready to use TSMCs 3nm process and will pay a penalty to TSMC.

Maybe further allowing Apple to swoop in and buy Intel's wafer scheduling to build more M3 on the cheap then pass the savings onto consumers?

Apparently they are delaying Intel 4 too. That means they will be stuck 10nm++++ for another year or so.

Apple has moved to 5nm node process since 2020.

AMD has 6nm Ryzen 6000 for laptops with respectable battery life.

Intel still stinks in battery life despite having big/little core technology over AMD.

omUHil7.jpg
 
So, now it looks like Intel won't be ready to use TSMCs 3nm process and will pay a penalty to TSMC.

Maybe further allowing Apple to swoop in and buy Intel's wafer scheduling to build more M3 on the cheap then pass the savings onto consumers?

If that's true, then likely Apple will try to push M2 Pro/Max into 3nm.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jdb8167
Last edited:
TSMC hoped to have the 3nm node ready by spring of this year, so it would make sense that Apple would have designed the M2 for 5nm and 3nm.

View attachment 2028048

Hoped?

They are already on track for high volume manufacturing of N3 in 2H22 as planned years ago.

 
Last edited:
Almost all major clients of TSMC attempted to reduce manufacturing amount so this is not only an Apple thing but industry wide thing. Usually Q3 is a strong quarter for electronics, but we are having a lower-than-expected demand this year.
Perhaps because so many people upgraded their computers to support WFH/Remote learning during the COVID lockdowns.
 
If that's true, then likely Apple will try to push M2 Pro/Max into 3nm.
Just for the record, when you start to design a chip, it is tied to a specific node. You don’t start to work on 5nm and then say, nah, let’s just shrink it down to 3nm and carry on. Also, I would be shocked if at least the M2 Max isn’t being done on 3nm - otherwise I don’t think it will be good enough for the Mac Pro or big enough of an upgrade, but we will see.
 
Just for the record, when you start to design a chip, it is tied to a specific node. You don’t start to work on 5nm and then say, nah, let’s just shrink it down to 3nm and carry on. Also, I would be shocked if at least the M2 Max isn’t being done on 3nm - otherwise I don’t think it will be good enough for the Mac Pro or big enough of an upgrade, but we will see.
I'd be surprised if any of the M2s are on 3nm. This is because M2 is based on the A15 which uses 5nm. The M2 itself uses 5nm as well. So if the M2 Max is on 3nm, that means Apple had to redesign the A15 to use 3nm, which obviously has different design rules.

It's possible that one of the M2 will be on 3nm. I think it's far more likely that M3 gets released in 3nm instead of any of the M2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uller6
I'd add that TSMC made a huge investment in 3nm (I saw $23B in one article). They'd probably rather have dinner with Xi than let that capacity sit idle... Someone or something is going to etch those wafers. I hope it's Apple.
 
I'd be surprised if any of the M2s are on 3nm. This is because M2 is based on the A15 which uses 5nm. The M2 itself uses 5nm as well. So if the M2 Max is on 3nm, that means Apple had to redesign the A15 to use 3nm, which obviously has different design rules.

It's possible that one of the M2 will be on 3nm. I think it's far more likely that M3 gets released in 3nm instead of any of the M2.
Good point regarding the A15 and 5nm, but on the other hand: I really don’t think making M2 Max on 5nm will be enough of a jump to be worthwhile for anything when Apple can make that on 3nm in the start of 2023.

In any event, I can’t wait to see a Mac Studio Ultra when the chip is done on 3nm. There is a decent chance that will already be out during 2023, like May 2023? A M2 Ultra on 5nm would be very meh in my book regarding to what is already out now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdb8167
It's not if testing was done on both 5nm and 3nm.
that's not how it works. When you design a chip, it's for a specific node, say 5nm and you ue the PDK (Process Development kit) that comes with that process. when done with design, you create a mask set to run actually wafers in the fab, those masksets are for 5nm. If you were "switching to 3nm, you basically have to start from scratch. now using the PDK for 3nm ... masksets for 5nm are rumored to be in the $10M range, 3nm masksets are rumored to be closer to $100M. So you're dealing with some heavy expenditures here and don't change plans midway thru ...
"Testing" occurs on actual wafers/chips, during the design phase you "simulate", and your simulation depends on the actual node designed to ...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.