Ok, definitely a milder case but it's still a sort of bloatware Apple should avoid.And in Apple's case, you have to choose to use them. Screensavers are all optional and customizable. And you can do it free.
Ok, definitely a milder case but it's still a sort of bloatware Apple should avoid.And in Apple's case, you have to choose to use them. Screensavers are all optional and customizable. And you can do it free.
For their own shows?Licensing issues maybe?
Then don’t select that as your screensaver?Someone probably realized that this would be perceived as yet another attempt at advertising, which casts a dark shadow on the "customer-first" messaging done by Apple. Who wants their TVs to be advertising while showing a screensaver? I sure don't!
The upcoming tvOS 18.2 update adds a rotation of Snoopy screen savers to 2021 and newer Apple TV models, but it seems that an additional "TV and Movies" category of screen savers has been canceled, or at least postponed. These screen savers were expected to be based on various Apple TV+ series and movies.
![]()
As spotted by the Dutch blog iCulture, Apple removed all references to the "TV and Movies" screen savers on its website in mid-November, including a preview of a new screen saver based on the Apple TV+ series "Foundation."
Apple also updated fine print on its website, although only in the U.S. for now. Apple often takes longer to update its regional websites for other countries.
The previous fine print:
The current fine print: Snoopy is technically Apple TV+ content now, but it looks like additional Apple TV+ screen savers will not be coming any time soon.
We expect tvOS 18.2 to be released to the public in December. The rotating Snoopy screen saver is already available in the third beta version of the update.
Other screen saver categories on the Apple TV include Aerials and Memories, along with a Portraits option with clocks added in tvOS 18.0.
Article Link: tvOS 18.2 No Longer Expected to Include More Apple TV+ Screen Savers
I don't think it would be perceived as advertising, mainly because you would have to purposely select them as your desired screensaver. You would have go out of your way just to turn them on.Someone probably realized that this would be perceived as yet another attempt at advertising, which casts a dark shadow on the "customer-first" messaging done by Apple. Who wants their TVs to be advertising while showing a screensaver? I sure don't!
If you have a screensaver, you are kinda committed and can't cancel the show just that.
I don't think it would be perceived as advertising, mainly because you would have to purposely select them as your desired screensaver. You would have go out of your way just to turn them on.
To make a really, really good screensaver? It's hard. You need art directors, designers, video editors, probably copy writers, and a creative director overseeing the whole thing.Jesus. They are screensavers. How hard is it?
To make a really, really good screensaver? It's hard. You need art directors, designers, video editors, probably copy writers, and a creative director overseeing the whole thing.
That’s too bad. I was really looking forward to having snoopy burned-in to my OLED panel.
I know, right?Jesus. They are screensavers. How hard is it?
Nah. To make a REALLY, REALLY good screensaver you need one or two people who are bored and good at coding.To make a really, really good screensaver? It's hard. You need art directors, designers, video editors, probably copy writers, and a creative director overseeing the whole thing.
I'm sorry but I can't accept a screensaver being labeled as bloatware.Ok, definitely a milder case but it's still a sort of bloatware Apple should avoid.