I'm back to annoy you with another thread about my image retention nightmare with my 27" 2014 riMac
I'm now beginning to regret buying this baby two years ago, because of how repetitive and time consuming this problem has become for me.
I didn't think modern displays could get image retention, so I was shocked when my 2014 riMac developed really bad image retention. I was reading posts on macrumors and it seems like this isn't a rare issue. Apparently it's not super common but a lot of users on the forum have complained that their imacs or macbooks eventually develop image retention, and a few people got to the point where they were *returning* their mac*books* if the internal display was an LG panel instead of a samsung panel.
Anyway, I fought with apple, drove out of my way into the city and lugged this huge imac around and finally, after the retention got so bad that apple could no longer deny it was an issue, they agreed to replace my screen.
10 days later I get my iMac back and I am overjoyed. Yet almost immediately I'm horrified to see that the new panel they've given me *also has retention*..... it's not as bad as the original display, however the original display started off just like this where there was a little bit of image retention which progressively got worse and worse and worse.
So here I am, having bought an iMac for over $3,000 which is marketed on apple.com/imac in HUGE LETTERS as "Retina. In colossal and ginormous." and I've gotten two in a row where this couldn't be further from the truth. I've spent countless hours talking and convincing apple of a problem, despite having apple care, driving in and out of the city, reinstalling OSX (to prove that it wasn't software related, and when I took the imac in to finally get repaired since its my work computer).
And now that the second display also has retention I have to AGAIN go through this entire process of convincing Apple that there's a problem (JUST LOOK AT THIS!), I have to lug this giant thing around some more, and I have to go 10 more days without my work computer. And this is all assuming they'll even give me a *third* display.
I'm dumbfounded here. This thing was expensive. Apple care was expensive and I *assumed* that it would protect me against problems like this. In the end there's an obvious hardware problem that I've had to fight to get fixed, and in the end is still broken anyway.
Also what are the odds that I got 2 displays with image retention in a row? I know this isn't a super rare problem but I didn't think it was *that* common. It makes me believe that there's probably a larger amount of imacs with this issue than we think, and that it will just take time for the screens to wear down, and perhaps some consumers don't realize they have retention because it primarily occurs when you switch to a dark grey or dark blue screen after having been viewing a white screen (like safari or textedit).
TLDR; expensive mac + apple care, lots of BS dealing with apple, they replace 1 damaged screen with another damaged screen
I'm now beginning to regret buying this baby two years ago, because of how repetitive and time consuming this problem has become for me.
I didn't think modern displays could get image retention, so I was shocked when my 2014 riMac developed really bad image retention. I was reading posts on macrumors and it seems like this isn't a rare issue. Apparently it's not super common but a lot of users on the forum have complained that their imacs or macbooks eventually develop image retention, and a few people got to the point where they were *returning* their mac*books* if the internal display was an LG panel instead of a samsung panel.
Anyway, I fought with apple, drove out of my way into the city and lugged this huge imac around and finally, after the retention got so bad that apple could no longer deny it was an issue, they agreed to replace my screen.
10 days later I get my iMac back and I am overjoyed. Yet almost immediately I'm horrified to see that the new panel they've given me *also has retention*..... it's not as bad as the original display, however the original display started off just like this where there was a little bit of image retention which progressively got worse and worse and worse.
So here I am, having bought an iMac for over $3,000 which is marketed on apple.com/imac in HUGE LETTERS as "Retina. In colossal and ginormous." and I've gotten two in a row where this couldn't be further from the truth. I've spent countless hours talking and convincing apple of a problem, despite having apple care, driving in and out of the city, reinstalling OSX (to prove that it wasn't software related, and when I took the imac in to finally get repaired since its my work computer).
And now that the second display also has retention I have to AGAIN go through this entire process of convincing Apple that there's a problem (JUST LOOK AT THIS!), I have to lug this giant thing around some more, and I have to go 10 more days without my work computer. And this is all assuming they'll even give me a *third* display.
I'm dumbfounded here. This thing was expensive. Apple care was expensive and I *assumed* that it would protect me against problems like this. In the end there's an obvious hardware problem that I've had to fight to get fixed, and in the end is still broken anyway.
Also what are the odds that I got 2 displays with image retention in a row? I know this isn't a super rare problem but I didn't think it was *that* common. It makes me believe that there's probably a larger amount of imacs with this issue than we think, and that it will just take time for the screens to wear down, and perhaps some consumers don't realize they have retention because it primarily occurs when you switch to a dark grey or dark blue screen after having been viewing a white screen (like safari or textedit).
TLDR; expensive mac + apple care, lots of BS dealing with apple, they replace 1 damaged screen with another damaged screen