Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

TheSynchronizer

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 2, 2014
443
729
45BA3E97-41C8-42E1-B5F2-BA0BC06C2A76.jpeg

Saw this interesting video from MaxTech about new software that utilises Apple’s official API’s to essentially unlock the max 1000 nits of brightness on the XDR displays system wide.

Thoughts on this? Anyone planning to use this? I know there was a whole discussion about why Apple essentially marketed the screen as sustained 1000 nits without making it clear it’s only in supported HDR scenarios, and 500 nits otherwise. Now with this software I guess their marketing is ‘truly’ accurate.

I myself tried the split screen trial and it indeed is impressive- however I’ve not found myself needing extra brightness yet and I only really use my iPad when outside.
 

sjalfr

macrumors member
Sep 26, 2008
70
63
Thin air
What! Was I misled? One of the reasons I ordered a MBP (delayed, so still waiting) over an Air is to get higher brightness for normal tasks like web browsing and Excel/Word type stuff! I'm always close to max brightness with my current Air. My increasing macular degeneration won't like it if the MBP is stuck at 500 nits most of the time.

So in what real life situations exactly would the brightness go up over 500 nits? Sorry, if this is a dumb question. I think I'm starting to get too old to understand what I am buying anymore o_O. Thanks.
 

TheSynchronizer

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 2, 2014
443
729
What! Was I misled? One of the reasons I ordered a MBP (delayed, so still waiting) over an Air is to get higher brightness for normal tasks like web browsing and Excel/Word type stuff! I'm always close to max brightness with my current Air. My increasing macular degeneration won't like it if the MBP is stuck at 500 nits most of the time.

So in what real life situations exactly would the brightness go up over 500 nits? Sorry, if this is a dumb question. I think I'm starting to get too old to understand what I am buying anymore o_O. Thanks.
Not exactly misled, but many people misunderstood what Apple was marketing just like you. Basically, the display can go up to its advertised 1000 nits sustained max brightness with 1600 nits peak on HDR content such as HDR movies, videos, photos, games etc.

However by default, standard UI elements / the system goes up to somewhere between 500-600 nits at max. The software I mentioned here aims to unlock the 1000 nits sustained max brightness to be available to use for everything, including non HDR content like the UI.

I myself thought i’d be getting 1000 nits max in everything by default too, but I’ve owned this laptop since release and I’ve never needed more brightness than what it offers (and when watching HDR movies at max brightness I more often than not have to turn the brightness down)
 

TheSynchronizer

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 2, 2014
443
729
Hopefully you get Apple Care Plus with this trick. you're going to need it.?
That’s to be seen really. The developers say there’s no reason to expect any damage as the screen is still operating entirely in Apple’s official specifications and protections.

And, in truth, these displays are indeed designed to display HDR content at up to 1000 nits sustained brightness indefinitely.

So theoretically this software should cause no damage. There is however the question of why Apple limited the brightness themselves instead of just giving 1000 nits to be available system wide
 
  • Haha
Reactions: G5isAlive

TheSynchronizer

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 2, 2014
443
729
Can you set the brightness to something in between 500 and 1000?
Yeah from my testing you get an additional few ‘clicks’ of brightness available to you, that go further than the default amount of clicks, so you can set it anywhere between 0 and 1000 really.
 

TheSynchronizer

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 2, 2014
443
729
Thanks a lot. I just looked into my current MBA (2019) and it says 400 nits. So the MBP's 500 to 600 nits should be an improvement for me. And also, thanks for the heads up on the software, I'll keep it in mind if I ever need it.
It is indeed an improvement. I came from a regular M1 Macbook Pro which already have 500 nit displays, and yet in bright scenarios these XDR displays still seem brighter and clearer. I’ve never had an issue with the screen brightness, but I also don’t use it in my garden as I use an iPad instead.
 

G5isAlive

Contributor
Aug 28, 2003
2,869
4,923
That’s to be seen really. The developers say there’s no reason to expect any damage as the screen is still operating entirely in Apple’s official specifications and protections.

And, in truth, these displays are indeed designed to display HDR content at up to 1000 nits sustained brightness indefinitely.

So theoretically this software should cause no damage. There is however the question of why Apple limited the brightness themselves instead of just giving 1000 nits to be available system wide

so the developers.. software hacks with a self interest to say no problem. are now engineers who can safely vouch for how Apple tested and designed these monitors?

and no, they are not designed to run indefinitely. if they were, the warrantee would be indefinite. if you push things they will age faster. some people like to keep their Apple gear past the warrantee period.

This is a bad idea.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: sjalfr

darngooddesign

macrumors P6
Jul 4, 2007
18,367
10,128
Atlanta, GA
What! Was I misled? One of the reasons I ordered a MBP (delayed, so still waiting) over an Air is to get higher brightness for normal tasks like web browsing and Excel/Word type stuff! I'm always close to max brightness with my current Air. My increasing macular degeneration won't like it if the MBP is stuck at 500 nits most of the time.

So in what real life situations exactly would the brightness go up over 500 nits? Sorry, if this is a dumb question. I think I'm starting to get too old to understand what I am buying anymore o_O. Thanks.
The MBPs do 600 nits instead of 500. Brightness aside, I think you will appreciate the increased contrast from Mini-LED,
 

sjalfr

macrumors member
Sep 26, 2008
70
63
Thin air
The MBPs do 600 nits instead of 500. Brightness aside, I think you will appreciate the increased contrast from Mini-LED,
I think I will. I bought the 2019 Air in a hurry to replace a failing 3-year old MBP, thinking I wouldn't miss the power or better specs that much. Even then I could tell the MBP screen was better! Can't wait to get my new machine...
 
  • Like
Reactions: slplss

TheSynchronizer

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 2, 2014
443
729
so the developers.. software hacks with a self interest to say no problem. are now engineers who can safely vouch for how Apple tested and designed these monitors?

and no, they are not designed to run indefinitely. if they were, the warrantee would be indefinite. if you push things they will age faster. some people like to keep their Apple gear past the warrantee period.

This is a bad idea.
Pro Display XDR can sustain 1000 nits of brightness across the full screen. This means that a pro can edit an HDR photograph or video with the entire frame at 1000 nits of brightness, indefinitely. It also has a peak brightness of 1600 nits. 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio.
- Apple Pro Display XDR. Assuming the tech is the same or similar between Apple XDR displays, the software should theoretically be safe to use. Of course, things do wear out as you say, and it should be common sense that the more you max something out, no matter what it is, it will potentially wear out faster than an equivalent item that wasn’t maxed out.

Indeed, the developers don’t make any guarantees so using any software such as this is essentially all at the user’s risk.
 

aevan

macrumors 601
Feb 5, 2015
4,541
7,236
Serbia
So theoretically this software should cause no damage. There is however the question of why Apple limited the brightness themselves instead of just giving 1000 nits to be available system wide

It could be panel longevity, then again it could be battery life or even color accuracy (if the content is not graded for 1000 nits, some things may be overblown).

We don’t know. They certainly had some reasons (good or bad). Limiting max brightness regardless of panel theoretical capability is not new.

Personally, I find 500 nits perfectly fine for SDR use and higher brightness is great for HDR content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheSynchronizer

TheSynchronizer

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 2, 2014
443
729
Personally, I find 500 nits perfectly fine for SDR use and higher brightness is great for HDR content.
Likewise, but it’s definitely nice to know the possibility to go higher brightness is there if needed.

Maybe if one day I live a lifestyle of working from a sunny beach, it’ll be useful :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: slplss

jaymc

macrumors 6502a
Nov 10, 2012
511
269
Port Orchard, WA
I picked it up for use only when outside. The price isn't too bad ...

Item purchased​

Vivid - Double your Brightness, System-Wide

Order Total​

€15

Payment Total​

$16.45

Also, if researching online, do NOT go to vivid.com ... it's NSFW. ;)
 
Last edited:

jaymc

macrumors 6502a
Nov 10, 2012
511
269
Port Orchard, WA

v1.5​

  • Huge improvements to white flashes and issues with Mission Control, Expose and Desktop Spaces
  • Tidied up brightness logic so it always maxes out the system brightness to full before Vivid kicks in and also moves the system brightness in more natural increments
  • We’ve enabled the fix for the video issues by default. You can disable this from Prefences > Experimental if you experience any issues (we haven’t heard about any so far)
  • Vivid will now ask to move itself out of your Downloads folder, so auto updates can then work
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheSynchronizer
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.