jessica. said:Did you get the kit lens or did you already have your own glass? What made you go with the d50 over the d70s or any canon model?
numediaman said:You could argue until you are blue-in-the-face about which is best -- but no one can argue that the Nikon is garbage, right?
numediaman said:[My wife just received a new Dell laptop yesterday and she can't get some of her basic software to install properly. She turned to me and said "don't even think about saying it ... 'I should have got a Mac'."]
numediaman said:The Canon vs. Nikon fighting seems a little more civil than the Mac vs. PC war. I would argue that while both sides could claim advantages, neither Nikon nor Canon lovers could claim that the other product crashes too often!
[My wife just received a new Dell laptop yesterday and she can't get some of her basic software to install properly. She turned to me and said "don't even think about saying it ... 'I should have got a Mac'."]
I have a question for those with a new DSLR: do you ever really get to know all these features?
gwuMACaddict said:so... a little late with pictures... here's one from yesterday at the national botanical gardens...
numediaman said:I have a question for those with a new DSLR: do you ever really get to know all these features?
-hh said:I think the 80/20 rule applies (80% of the time, you'll only use 20% of the features), probably in no small part because whatever your favorite subjects are will tend to have common patterns and thus, call for similar treatment.
FWIW, this is an example that's "besides glass" as to why it can be good to stick with a particular company: in going through the documentation for my 20D, I was frequently saying to myself, "Okay, the same as how it worked on my old Elan...yup same, ok same, yup same..." As such, there were a lot of features that I already was essentially familar with, which got me a good leg up the learning curve.
-hh
cr2sh said:What type of deal did you get on it, Chip?
I'm going down to the CordCamera to look more closely at the deals.. the photo printer rebate runs out of the 7th and I plan to take advantage of it.
Chip NoVaMac said:I work for a DC reseller, so deals don't count much. I did buy it now so as to take advantage of the Epson rebates on the PictureMate.
Some may wonder why with a great Canon kit, did I do the Nikon D50. Simply put, with at least two or three European trips planned for this year I wanted a general purpose camera and lens that was light weight.
Our Nikon rep came by with a 18-200VR a few weeks ago. I was blown away! The VR II is so much better than even the latest IS from Canon IMO. I was able to get down to 1/15th of a second at 200mm with the Nikkor. I did play with the Canon 24-105L IS, and I was only able to get to about 1/30. The sharpness on the few images that we did get to print out was surprising for such an extreme zoom from Nikon. Add to that Canon does not yet offer a 18-200 IS lens. Nor do they offer a fisheye lens.
The fisheye lens from Nikon (the 10.5) was sort of the icing on the cake. With Nikon Capture, I will have the ability to correct for the distortion of the fisheye lens. I am also looking forward to seeing how the Dust Reference Image feature of Capture works out.
The first half of the year or so will tell me more as to whether I keep both systems (keeping in mind, I look at cameras as tools. As such I don't see a problem in having "Craftsman" and "insert your preferred tool name here" in the shop).
gwuMACaddict said:Got the d50 because there is little to no difference between it and the D70s...
nobody shoots at 1/8000 of a second, and nobody triggers remote flash units with a built in flash unit. the d70 does this. if i'm using remote flashes, i'm using an sb800 anyway...