Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

dcaccount

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Nov 17, 2013
316
14
Hello,
On my iMac2019 I am still with Ventura. I am wondering if it is the case to upgrade to Sonoma, in terms of speed and reliability.

Would you suggest me to upgrade or just to stay with Ventura?

Thanks,
Daniele
 

Ben J.

macrumors 65816
Aug 29, 2019
1,062
623
Oslo
Are there any specific reason for you to install Sonoma?
Are there new features in Sonoma that you need or find tempting?
Anything not working well with Ventura?
If not, stay with Ventura.

I tried Sonoma on my mini for a few days a couple of times, and had several problems both times. I also found no really useful new features, animated wallpapers and new emojies I can do without, so I'm still on Ventura which is working very well for me. I also have a couple of, for me, crucial apps that are not yet supporting Sonoma.

I'm thinking in a few months time we'll be seeing a mature version of Sequoia that's been tested by a lot of people, and I'll be giving it a try then.

There is no reason to think that upgrading to Sonoma will have any effect on the speed of processing or workflow. A so-called clean install, on the other hand, where you erase the drive and install a fresh system, will often make a mac feel more responsive and fast. But that involves (or at least should involve) reinstalling all apps and extensions, reconfiguring all settings etc. Many, like me, do that once every few years, especially if jump upgrading across a couple of versions of macOS. Like moving house and setting things up from scratch. Can be a good thing, and give a nice, fresh feeling.
 
Last edited:

Sciuriware

macrumors 6502a
Jan 4, 2014
758
165
Gelderland
Hello,
On my iMac2019 I am still with Ventura. I am wondering if it is the case to upgrade to Sonoma, in terms of speed and reliability.

Would you suggest me to upgrade or just to stay with Ventura?

Thanks,
Daniele
My humble opinion: it is WAR on the Internet,
Apple, Linux and Microsoft constantly battle to protect their stuff by new defends, as the 'bad persons' find new threats.
The best personal defence is: do not install the latest version, but do not delay it too long.
Forget about new features you do not need, suspect that Apple does not tell you about all 'military' defence details.
;JOOP!
 

Tapper

macrumors member
Dec 30, 2013
57
14
Los Angeles, CA
Last month I finally upgraded a Mac Mini M1 and 2 MacBook Air's M1 from Monterey to Sonoma. Everything working fine. It was a required upgrade since Monterey has reached end of life. I don't notice any differences other than some cool features that were added in Ventura and Sonoma.
 

halledise

macrumors 68020
i've tried them all and returned to Monterey - which came with my M2 Air.
it's easier to navigate as far as system preferences go, it's fast and responsive plus all my apps work just fine.
ventura, sonoma and sequoia have bells and whistles that i don't really need.
unless something drastic happens down the track, i'll stick with Monterey …
 
  • Like
Reactions: iMac2019

dcaccount

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Nov 17, 2013
316
14
Thanks for replying.
I am not interested in any of the features they added in Sonoma. I am just interested in speed and reliability. In these terms is Sonoma any better than Ventura?
Please advise, thanks
 

Sciuriware

macrumors 6502a
Jan 4, 2014
758
165
Gelderland
Hello,
On my iMac2019 I am still with Ventura. I am wondering if it is the case to upgrade to Sonoma, in terms of speed and reliability.

Would you suggest me to upgrade or just to stay with Ventura?

Thanks,
Daniele
You may expect that new releases are bigger, slower and safer; while your hardware may be faster by the same ratio ...
;JOOP!
 
  • Like
Reactions: halledise

doobydoooby

macrumors regular
Oct 17, 2011
245
355
Genève, Switzerland
I had a big & definite reason to update: I have internal SSDs on a sled (its a 2019 Mac Pro) and for whatever reason that was an OS 14 intermittent kernel panic catastrophe which was fixed in Sequoia. So despite my usual reticence to upgrade, because the benefit was potentially so huge, I waited a week or two and then upgraded once it was clear there were no armageddon stories out there. And honestly, its been perfect; no reason whatsoever to complain. All my apps work as before, the SSD sled-related kernel panics are gone, the integration with iphone is very useful (eg 2FA apps). All good. Its neither faster nor slower than before, but good to know the security side is up to date.
 

Fishrrman

macrumors Penryn
Feb 20, 2009
29,233
13,304
OP:

If you're unsure as to whether you want to upgrade to Sonoma, I'll offer this advice. It's what I do with EVERY new version of the Mac OS.

Get an EXTERNAL USB3 SSD.
If you have USBc ports, get one that is USB3.1 gen2 like the Crucial X9.

Now, install the new OS onto the EXTERNAL drive.
Then migrate over apps you're going to use, etc.

Why do this?
Because it gives you a way to test and evaluate a new OS BEFORE you "commit yourself" to installing it on your internal drive.

Try the new OS off-and-on for a few weeks.
If there are no problems, THEN think about doing the upgrade on the internal drive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iMac2019

Tapper

macrumors member
Dec 30, 2013
57
14
Los Angeles, CA
Fishrrman, I did run Sonoma over a few months on my external SSD just to play around with it and see if anything bothered me besides the redesign of the System Settings app.

Regarding speed, I would say operations are generally slightly faster. I'll probably upgrade to Sequoia after a few .x releases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sciuriware
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.