Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Jutah

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Mar 30, 2012
1,026
464
Hi all,
i just moved from a 2,3ghz i5 MBP 2019 to a M2 MBP PRO brand new.
Both equipped with 16gb of ram.

I use it for office activities, especialli Google suite (chat/meet and a lot of Chrome with many different windows open).

I wish i had upgraded to 32gb of ram but i got budget constraints.

I tested the ram usage under stress condition (100 tabs open in chrome with the site trackthis.link): it happens that the old mac seems to have a really better ram management than the new one.

The graph stay green all the time, while the new m2 go in the yellow zone.

How is it possible?

Thank you for any explanation you can share :)

m2

1686316119062.png


i5

1686316250499.png
 
Are you perhaps running a lot of your apps in Rosetta still?

In Activity Monitor -> CPU you can sort apps by Kind and see what's running as Intel.

Generally speaking, 16 GB of RAM on Apple Silicon should have more headroom than 16 GB of ram on Intel as it is more memory efficient.
 
Are you perhaps running a lot of your apps in Rosetta still?

In Activity Monitor -> CPU you can sort apps by Kind and see what's running as Intel.

Generally speaking, 16 GB of RAM on Apple Silicon should have more headroom than 16 GB of ram on Intel as it is more memory efficient.

Hi, thanks for the answer.
No, the only apps running as "intel" is whatsapp.

Generally speaking, 16 GB of RAM on Apple Silicon should have more headroom than 16 GB of ram on Intel as it is more memory efficient.

yes, exactly, that's what I've read before purchase so I'm little surprised about that consumption difference.
If I check the "CPU" usage within the same stress test (100 opening tabs) the winner - by far - is the m2.
 
Last edited:
Well as the old motto goes, unused RAM is wasted RAM. I wouldn't worry about it unless memory pressure gets really high and a lot of page file swapping occurs.

100 tabs open in Chrome is not really meant for a system that has only 16GB of RAM of which some is shared for use as GPU VRAM.
 
I would say this is unoptimized macos issue. You and i need to find the best one for our 14 pros.
 
Thank you all guys. Reading here and there i see that the M processors uses RAM in a different way than before.
Another guy on reddit says:

Well I think with the unified memory you are sharing ram and vram, that may be where the 2gb difference come from. Plus, since new MBP have way faster ssd, macos rely more heavily on swap and don't fear filling the memory for a much smoother experience.

that's the answer i think.

Anyway, even when the "yellow zone" appears the machine seems smooth and there's no overheating or lagging in the usage.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.