Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Strategia

macrumors member
Original poster
Mar 26, 2019
88
145
My 21.5" 2013 iMac has a decidedly non-Retina (1080p) display. It works great on unsupported Big Sur, but clearly Apple is no longer optimizing visual elements (like Control Center) for non-Retina displays. By using a 21.5" 2015 or even 2017 panel, I am thinking it may be possible to upgrade the screen to 4K @ 60Hz. I already have experience with opening up the machine as I recently upgraded the "non-user-accessible" memory and storage.

I am unsure of whether the integrated GPU (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200) can even drive a Retina panel. Intel lists the GPU as capable of driving a 3840x2160 display at 60 hertz. Promising, but Wikipedia lists the 21.5" 4K iMac resolution at the slightly larger 4096x2304. Someone with a Nvidia GPU would likely have no issue in this department.

Comparing the display connectors using iFixit display replacement guides appear to show that the cables are the same. Someone with a keener eye might spot the difference I am overlooking.

2013 21.5" iMac:
https://guide-images.cdn.ifixit.com/igi/RuoSZ5iXxQqvKfcF.huge
https://guide-images.cdn.ifixit.com/igi/2CYaRvZMKD1MHJWF.huge

2015 21.5" iMac (Retina):
https://guide-images.cdn.ifixit.com/igi/LhWm4T3JEHaeoZ2T.huge
https://guide-images.cdn.ifixit.com/igi/bRPraRvEkFJQYPsa.huge

Has anyone ever tried this, or am I just crazy? I guess there is only one way to find out if this works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1
Hi.

Im very certain this isn’t doable. LVDS connector on the retina has a lot more pins than non-retina.

And those ifixit pictures of the 2015 aren’t from an actual 2015, as you can visibly see ram - even though ram is soldered to the board for these models.
 
I am unsure of whether the integrated GPU (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200) can even drive a Retina panel. Intel lists the GPU as capable of driving a 3840x2160 display at 60 hertz. Promising, but Wikipedia lists the 21.5" 4K iMac resolution at the slightly larger 4096x2304.
The Iris Pro 5200 has a 540 MHz pixel clock limit (source; page 148), which is enough for 4096×2304 at 53 Hz using CVT-RB timings (calculator). I haven’t tested if that GPU will actually output a 4096×2304 resolution to begin with though. I have the hardware to test this - shall I, in the name of science? ;) But even if this doesn’t work, the Late 2015 Retina 4K iMac's panel also has a 3840×2160 60 Hz mode listed in its EDID, so…

A Nvidia Kepler GPU will do 4096×2304 just fine (proof) - at 53 Hz, due to the same 540 MHz pixel clock limit (source). The same applies to an AMD Radeon HD 7000 series or newer GPU (proof).

All this doesn't tell us anything about whether the Late 2013 iMac can actually drive an internal 4K panel though, so it remains purely academic.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Strategia
I am unsure of whether the integrated GPU (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200) can even drive a Retina panel. Intel lists the GPU as capable of driving a 3840x2160 display at 60 hertz. Promising, but Wikipedia lists the 21.5" 4K iMac resolution at the slightly larger 4096x2304. Someone with a Nvidia GPU would likely have no issue in this department.

Comparing the display connectors using iFixit display replacement guides appear to show that the cables are the same. Someone with a keener eye might spot the difference I am overlooking.

You can test the iGPU capability easily.
1 mDP to HDMI 2.0 cable.
Connect the iMac to your 4k TV set.
Moving the mouse to see if it's smooth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Strategia
I have the hardware to test this - shall I, in the name of science?
Go ahead! Share your findings with us. While I agree this isn't very economical, it will be an interesting experiment. If TwoH is right, perhaps the retina connector can be soldered on?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Strategia
That mode actually looks fine on the panel, and so does the pixel-perfect 1984×1116 HiDPI mode.
Very promising! Now all that remains is for some brave soul to try grafting the same panel on internally. Honestly, not sure if I have the time to do so, but at least we know it wouldn't be completely impossible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1
Very promising!
You know what's weird? My 2011 MacBook Pro with Intel HD Graphics 3000 can run full 4096×2304 (at 27 Hz but that's beside the point). Yet a newer and substantially more powerful GPU cannot…
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Strategia
2015 retina connector
DAF3CD45-008B-49BC-B752-7B1553AFCB7D.jpeg


2013 connector
21DB808F-8DD2-4C5C-BE70-EA4C517FB931.jpeg


LVDS difference
819599D6-5CB4-4BB6-B777-3302996DCD77.jpeg



believe it’s 30 pin compared to 40 pin
 
since this is the only thread I could find that is somehow relevant on this topic, has there been there any progress on this?

can one replace/upgrade an old iMac 2009-2011 to a 4K/5K Retina display?

with an upgrade of the GPU that could easily handle higher resolutions, the main problems are the connectors of the LCDs? or what else needs to be done?

isn't there a "panel" similar to what is used when transforming an old 2017 iMac to a 5K monitor??
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sserna14
since this is the only thread I could find that is somehow relevant on this topic, has there been there any progress on this?

can one replace/upgrade an old iMac 2009-2011 to a 4K/5K Retina display?

with an upgrade of the GPU that could easily handle higher resolutions, the main problems are the connectors of the LCDs? or what else needs to be done?

isn't there a "panel" similar to what is used when transforming an old 2017 iMac to a 5K monitor??
Im wondering the same thing i have a mid 2011 gtx 880m, could be this possible with the right connectors?
 
Retina displays used in iMacs have a 60-pin connector. This has already been written about. But that's not even the point. The matrix has 8 lines. Regular ones have 4 lines. Laptop matrices, including Retina, have 4 lines. Instead of a Retina matrix, you can connect a regular matrix with 4 lines and the image will still be there. Below is an example picture. These matrices have 60 pins and 8 lines. Honestly, I don't understand how to get 8 lines. 4 from a discrete video accelerator and another 4 from an integrated one? And then it turns out that they work in parallel? I don't have any exact information. You need to buy at least BoardView for such a model. Most likely, the matrix will not display an image until it receives data from all 8 lines. Useless. All that remains is to look for a matrix of a suitable size, 40 pins, with a resolution higher than the usual full HD. You may have to edit the matrix's EDID to help the system use it. This is done through the properties or the edited EDID is loaded.
 

Attachments

  • 16 non-Retina.png
    16 non-Retina.png
    3.9 MB · Views: 39
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.