Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Sapphyre

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Nov 24, 2005
13
0
Ontario, Canada
I want to upgrade from 10.1.5 to Panther... can I do this directly or do I have to go from 10.1.5 to 10.2 and then upgrade to 10.3?
 

mad jew

Moderator emeritus
Apr 3, 2004
32,191
9
Adelaide, Australia
I assume it's possible but I personally wouldn't want to do that. They're quite different beasts (puns suck) so I'd recommend doing an archive and install instead whereby your settings are still saved but you get a fresh install of the system. :)
 

Will Cheyney

macrumors 6502a
Jul 13, 2005
701
0
United Kingdom
I never install a new OS 'over the top' as it were.
I always backup and completely wipe the HD and then install the new OS.

I'd recommend just going straight to 10.4 if I were you though.
 

Sapphyre

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Nov 24, 2005
13
0
Ontario, Canada
How well would 10.4 run on my computer? I have an iBook G3, 700MHz, 640Mb RAM, 20Gb.

Forgive my ignorance, but I've never actually upgraded an OS before so I'm not exactly sure how one would backup everything before doing a clean install and then get it all back on afterwards... could someone give me a hand? Thanks :)
 

mkrishnan

Moderator emeritus
Jan 9, 2004
29,776
15
Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Mmmm, I think the 10.4 question would depend on how full your HD is. With only 20GB, you could quickly slip into the low-free-space kinds of issues other people have been seeing. But otherwise, speed-wise, both should, in general, be faster than 10.1.x on your computer. For the love of god, please get off of 10.1, though! :D
 

fartheststar

macrumors 6502a
Dec 29, 2003
504
2
Toronto
IJ Reilly said:
This is totally unnecessary.

I would disagree. People who post to this board who wipe and install clean have had fewer errors in my "unscientific" observation. I'm one of them.;)

Especially since the OP is moving from 10.1

Edit: Changed "less" to "fewer".. hehe. thanks Blue Velvet.
 

mad jew

Moderator emeritus
Apr 3, 2004
32,191
9
Adelaide, Australia
IJ Reilly said:
This is totally unnecessary.


I also disagree. Although it may not necessarily be necessary (I good at English), it pretty much ensures a clean system. An upgrade cannot guaranty this. You can't deny that there have been quite a few members around here who've had to go back and do clean install to get rid of a few (usually minor) gremlins. I found the clean install of Tiger on my iBook much better than the upgrade. Problems included apps that wouldn't open and a broken Safari. :(
 

Blue Velvet

Moderator emeritus
Jul 4, 2004
21,929
265
fartheststar said:
I would disagree. People who post to this board who wipe and install clean have had less errors in my "unscientific" observation. I'm one of them.;)

Especially since the OP is moving from 10.1



I disagree -- it should be 'fewer errors' not 'less'. :D :p
 

doucy2

macrumors 65816
Jul 7, 2005
1,013
0
run panther 10.3 on that ibook
that what i have on mine (runs smoothly)
 

FF_productions

macrumors 68030
Apr 16, 2005
2,822
0
Mt. Prospect, Illinois
Stick with panther, tiger is a real big memory hog. There isn't much of a difference between the OS's (widgets are nice, I use them once in a while ,but not that big of a deal in my opinion).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.