Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

barefeats

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jul 6, 2000
1,058
19
I was curious what speeds i would get if I connected my FireWire/USB/SATA notebook enclosure with Hitachi Travelstar 7K200 to the MacBook Air versus the MacBook Pro. Using QuickBench 4.03's large sustained transfer test:

MacBook Air USB 2.0 = 31MB/s READ, 23MB/s WRITE
MacBook Pro FireWire 800 = 70MB/s READ, 56MB/s WRITE
 

JSchwage

macrumors 6502a
May 5, 2006
592
45
Rochester, NY
Hmm. That's odd. I would have thought the MacBook Air would have faster transfers due to having the high-powered USB port.
 

MRU

macrumors Penryn
Aug 23, 2005
25,370
8,952
a better place
:rolleyes::confused:

Really sorry but they are not very interesting results.

The firewire 800 is an absolute no brainer would have faster sustained rates of transfer. Heck firewire 400 has a faster sustained rate than USB2 also.

USB2's 480mbps transfer is based on 'peak' peformance and not sustained. Common knowledge at this stage.




Now try the same test with the same drive plugged into your MBP via USB2 and we can talk if there is a difference between it and the MBA, otherwise your result and this thread is unfortunately pretty pointless.
 

JSchwage

macrumors 6502a
May 5, 2006
592
45
Rochester, NY
Ohhh! Firewire 800. Duh! Sorry. I thought you were comparing USB 2.0 on the MacBook Pro and the MacBook Air. Of course Firewire 800 is faster than USB 2.0.
 

DoFoT9

macrumors P6
Jun 11, 2007
17,586
100
London, United Kingdom
hhmm i doubt that the MBA would have increased USB2.0 speeds compared to a l computer because of the computer, because the actual HD would have to be higher powered or something aswell..
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.