Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

50L

macrumors regular
Original poster
Mar 2, 2014
141
4
I'm looking for a gaming setup but don't have a spot to place another monitor.


So what I was thinking, since i'm upgrading next year to the apple studio,

Can I already buy the studio display and use this as my gaming screen + as my Imac screen

In other words, can I use the imac only as computer, and hook it up to a studio display for the screen? or will this lag in any way?
 

HobeSoundDarryl

macrumors G5
An ASD can be set up as a second display for an iMac that is compatible. Here's good general information about connecting them.

While most people would use both screens together for much more screen R.E., you can mirror the main screen to the ASD and perhaps position it in front of the iMac screen. However, if me, I'd put them side-by-side and have what will essentially be about double the screen R.E.

Depending on the importance of the gaming aspect, you might also want to consider alternative screens (or even a television with "gaming mode"). Gamers usually want higher refresh rates than ASD offers. Perhaps your iMac keeps being a productivity screen and you get a gamer-oriented screen for gaming?

Also, many games tend to look and play their best on LOWER resolutions than 5K. It's common to have graphics settings at 1080p (HD) or 1440p to maximize various tradeoffs for the best gaming experience.

Neither of those last 2 paragraphs are a great help with the double duty goal of pairing it with the future Mac Studio, which would like a 5K screen like ASD. So you might want to split this thinking into 2 separate screens: a much less expensive, high-refresh-rate, lower-resolution monitor (or TV) dedicated to the gaming push... and then pick up a 5K monitor when you buy the Mac Studio for general purpose computing. Until then, your iMac can keep scratching the latter itch.

And you MIGHT want to even split out the platform thinking too by picking up a gaming PC for the gaming (so you'll have access to tons of games) vs. hoping the present or future Mac will be a big gaming computer. Yes, there ARE lots of rumors about Apple getting serious about gaming now (and obviously wait for tonight's show) but Apple has gotten "serious about gaming" many times before and not so much came from it.

Apple and Apple fans seem to keep recycling this illusion that building great hardware alone will bring on gaming development when what big games on Apple tech actually needs is lots of MONEY allocation to drive it (just like MONEY- not hardware advances alone- drives gaming for PC, PS5, XBOX, etc). If Apple doesn't announce an AppleTV+-like business unit with a commensurate BUDGET and dedicated staff all put towards Apple gaming, this push should pan out about like the last 5 or 8 gaming pushes by Apple.

A classic Elvis song applies: "A little less conversation, a little more action 💵💵💵 " If it's all talk and no money, game developers will overwhelmingly keep choosing the money-making path even if the hardware is superior tech for gaming. Apparently, companies other than Apple prioritize profit above all else too? ;)

Meanwhile, PC is quite serious about gaming as evidenced by the multitudes of games available for it and a loaded pipeline of new games coming soon. Key players there like Sony and Microsoft spend tons of money subsidizing AAA game development, buying gaming studios, employing huge staffs dedicated to creating games, etc. If Apple doesn't do something similar, the other players will continue to get the vast majority of games. Follow the money.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee and 50L

50L

macrumors regular
Original poster
Mar 2, 2014
141
4
An ASD can be set up as a second display for an iMac that is compatible. Here's good general information about connecting them.

While most people would use both screens together for much more screen R.E., you can mirror the main screen to the ASD and perhaps position it in front of the iMac screen. However, if me, I'd put them side-by-side and have what will essentially be about double the screen R.E.

Depending on the importance of the gaming aspect, you might also want to consider alternative screens (or even a television with "gaming mode"). Gamers usually want higher refresh rates than ASD offers. Perhaps your iMac keeps being a productivity screen and you get a gamer-oriented screen for gaming?

Also, many games tend to look and play their best on LOWER resolutions than 5K. It's common to have graphics settings at 1080p (HD) or 1440p to maximize various tradeoffs for the best gaming experience.

Neither of those last 2 paragraphs are a great help with the double duty goal of pairing it with the future Apple Studio, which would like a 5K screen like ASD. So you might want to split this thinking into 2 separate screens: a much less expensive, high-refresh-rate, lower-resolution monitor (or TV) dedicated to the gaming push... and then pick up a 5K monitor when you buy the Apple Studio for general purpose computing. Until then, your iMac can keep scratching the latter itch.

And you MIGHT want to even split out the platform thinking too by picking up a gaming PC for the gaming (so you'll have access to tons of games) vs. hoping the present or future Mac will be a big gaming computer. Yes, there ARE lots of rumors about Apple getting serious about gaming now (and obviously wait for tonight's show) but Apple has gotten "serious about gaming" many times before and not so much came from it.

Apple and Apple fans seem to keep recycling this illusion that building great hardware alone will bring on gaming development when what big games on Apple tech actually needs is lots of MONEY allocation to drive it (just like MONEY- not hardware advances alone- drives gaming for PC, PS5, XBOX, etc). If Apple doesn't announce an AppleTV+-like business unit with a commensurate BUDGET and dedicated staff all put towards Apple gaming, this push should pan out about like the last 5 or 8 gaming pushes by Apple.

A classic Elvis song applies: "A little less conversation, a little more action 💵💵💵 " If it's all talk and no money, game developers will overwhelmingly keep choosing the money-making path even if the hardware is superior tech for gaming. Apparently, companies other than Apple prioritize profit above all else too? ;)

Meanwhile, PC is quite serious about gaming as evidenced by the multitudes of games available for it and a loaded pipeline of new games coming soon. Key players there like Sony and Microsoft spend tons of money subsidizing AAA game development, buying gaming studios, employing huge staffs dedicated to creating games, etc. If Apple doesn't do something similar, the other players will continue to get the vast majority of games. Follow the money.
Thx!! Grtz
 

twinpeaks_sf

macrumors regular
Jul 9, 2015
189
119
Lamorinda, CA, USA
IMG_2312.jpeg
It's a weird pairing aesthetically, but it works really well for me. I don't pay attention to the difference in bezel color, and the smaller screen is perfect as a reference display, whereas my ASD is the primary workspace. The key is that the relative resolutions and color profiles match (which they do perfectly to my eyes).
 

Nguyen Duc Hieu

macrumors 68040
Jul 5, 2020
3,016
1,006
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
An ASD can be set up as a second display for an iMac that is compatible. Here's good general information about connecting them.

While most people would use both screens together for much more screen R.E., you can mirror the main screen to the ASD and perhaps position it in front of the iMac screen. However, if me, I'd put them side-by-side and have what will essentially be about double the screen R.E.

Depending on the importance of the gaming aspect, you might also want to consider alternative screens (or even a television with "gaming mode"). Gamers usually want higher refresh rates than ASD offers. Perhaps your iMac keeps being a productivity screen and you get a gamer-oriented screen for gaming?

Also, many games tend to look and play their best on LOWER resolutions than 5K. It's common to have graphics settings at 1080p (HD) or 1440p to maximize various tradeoffs for the best gaming experience.

Neither of those last 2 paragraphs are a great help with the double duty goal of pairing it with the future Mac Studio, which would like a 5K screen like ASD. So you might want to split this thinking into 2 separate screens: a much less expensive, high-refresh-rate, lower-resolution monitor (or TV) dedicated to the gaming push... and then pick up a 5K monitor when you buy the Mac Studio for general purpose computing. Until then, your iMac can keep scratching the latter itch.

And you MIGHT want to even split out the platform thinking too by picking up a gaming PC for the gaming (so you'll have access to tons of games) vs. hoping the present or future Mac will be a big gaming computer. Yes, there ARE lots of rumors about Apple getting serious about gaming now (and obviously wait for tonight's show) but Apple has gotten "serious about gaming" many times before and not so much came from it.

Apple and Apple fans seem to keep recycling this illusion that building great hardware alone will bring on gaming development when what big games on Apple tech actually needs is lots of MONEY allocation to drive it (just like MONEY- not hardware advances alone- drives gaming for PC, PS5, XBOX, etc). If Apple doesn't announce an AppleTV+-like business unit with a commensurate BUDGET and dedicated staff all put towards Apple gaming, this push should pan out about like the last 5 or 8 gaming pushes by Apple.

A classic Elvis song applies: "A little less conversation, a little more action 💵💵💵 " If it's all talk and no money, game developers will overwhelmingly keep choosing the money-making path even if the hardware is superior tech for gaming. Apparently, companies other than Apple prioritize profit above all else too? ;)

Meanwhile, PC is quite serious about gaming as evidenced by the multitudes of games available for it and a loaded pipeline of new games coming soon. Key players there like Sony and Microsoft spend tons of money subsidizing AAA game development, buying gaming studios, employing huge staffs dedicated to creating games, etc. If Apple doesn't do something similar, the other players will continue to get the vast majority of games. Follow the money.

Usually I don't speculate that anyone asking about gaming set-up will play competitive AAA game titles, which result in the configuration you mentioned (1080p @ 144Hz or 240Hz). Maybe they just want to play a serious money dumping title like Evony or something similar (LOL)....
 
  • Like
Reactions: HobeSoundDarryl
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.