Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Videot27

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Apr 2, 2010
20
6
Chicago
Hi, all —

Is anyone out there using LG's ultra-wide 34" display as a primary monitor for their Mac Pro? I'm speccing out a new workstation for video editing here at work (FCPX, AfterEffects, maybe some Premiere Pro) and will be upgrading from a 27" iMac.
Since I'm returning to the world of build-it-yourself options (my last two or three Macs were middle-of-the-road stock 27" iMacs), I'm not sure what video card and monitor combinations would work best for me.
It's a school environment so critical color grading isn't an issue. I just want a decent monitor which would offer a solid, functional workspace primarily for creating educational content in FCP and AE.

Which card would be best to spec? Would a single card feed a 21:9 display AND a second monitor at the same time? Would I need Thunderbolt-to-HDMI adapters for one or both monitors?

Does the LG 34WL550-B take full advantage of the Mac Pro, and vice-versa?

Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance.

— Mike
 
Wait, isn't that a 1080p monitor - at 34 inches? Have you checked it out in person to make sure it's not looking way to coarse? Seems like an odd fit for such an expensive computer.
 
I was surprised to see how low the resolution was on this monitor. I will be in the market for a new display wen I upgrade to a new Mac later this year or early next year. Would prefer a wide screen since I prefer horizontal screen space over vertical.
 
You can get monitors that size from the same company in higher resolutions no problem. The LGs I've had so far were fine screens otherwise. I have the LG 34UC99 which has a nice picture at 1440p.
 
Don’t waste your time with any ultrawide that has less than 1600px in height, and definitely seems odd to want to pair such a cheap average monitor with any sort of 2019 Mac Pro.
 
I have an LG 29’ ultra wide in a stacked configuration with an LG 24” UltraFine 4K Thunderbolt 3 above it. I find the ultra wides are great for timeline and content creation, but a 4K monitor is needed for color correction and photo editing.
 
I have an LG 29’ ultra wide in a stacked configuration with an LG 24” UltraFine 4K Thunderbolt 3 above it. I find the ultra wides are great for timeline and content creation, but a 4K monitor is needed for color correction and photo editing.
Doesn’t your neck get sore looking up at that much screen height. I have issues with my 27” thunderbolts display.
 
Ultra wide is 2” off my desk and 24” is sitting on top. It’s actually a comfortable feel
 
Hello,

On my Mac Pro video workstation, I use the LG 38UC99, which is larger than the model you mentioned, but features a 1600px vertical resolution. It surprisingly makes a difference to have that extra bit of vertical resolution.

Good luck
 
38" Ultrawide Dell here, 3840x1600. I agree, the 3440x1400 ones are not worth it. Now they have some 5120x2160 ones coming out.


One of these may be calling me soon. The only thing stopping me is that it does not have 2 standard USB upstream ports. The current Dell I have has 2 and works really well as a KVM, as I have a single keyboard and mouse that auto switches to whatever computer I am displaying; when I switch inputs.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
5120x2160 at 34 inch sounds a little ....small? Native resolution probably means tiny headache-inducing interfaces for anybody who doesn't have perfect vision. And setting it up as a 'Retina' display gives you 1080p again. Awesome :)

There's no way to set a custom scale for the interface and fonts in MacOS, is there?

If I had to buy again I'd also pick the LG 38UC99 or whatever successor at 1600p. That should be a very readable native res for that size (like the 34-incher is at 1440p).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.