Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ylluminate

macrumors regular
Original poster
Sep 28, 2017
136
146
Well folks, just wanted to relate some experiences I've had in my small foray into Ventura and am done with this iteration of the OS it appears. A few major halting / critical points on an M1 Max system (also, just to be clear, I'm not a novice user - I've been a goto guy that has helped Apple "Geniuses" over the years when they can't figure things out) :

  1. Be aware that the upgrade can seriously fail. I tried both 13.0 and 13.1 beta. The system, while performing an upgrade, had an infinite Apple logo reboot loop that went into recovery mode after several reboot attempts. I went through several troubleshooting steps that I won't document here. USB backups don't boot so the recovery process is HORRIFIC now for Apple. Removing the ability to boot to USB drives is a nightmare level mistake by Apple. I do not trust Apple whatsoever anymore, even though their brand of OS is still the lesser of the proverbial "poisons" yet still (not a compliment, just an observation).
  2. Installed from scratch, but restore of previous system settings failed for some various obscure/unclear reasons. This situation descended into chaos when I found that the Recovery tool no longer worked and no associated tools work. This mode also incorrectly detected my system volume as being encrypted and no usernames or passwords that are system admins/owners would actually authenticate with the actually correct password. Things are seriously broken when they break with the recovery situation.
  3. My Time Machine backup did not work properly. It was detected and all seemed well with it, but the system, again, for some obscure and non-clear reason, failed to use it. I had to use a secondary backup made with Super Duper, BUT that was a ridiculous process. It took 30 hours to restore the 7tb+ of data.
  4. APFS Snapshots are a steaming mess. Apple is not using APFS snapshots properly / appropriately; I could not rollback on the upgrade system to to Monterey. This is an enormous problem and oversight / missed opportunity by Apple and is truly baffling. I've had some people who know the internal goings on at Apple express extreme frustration for not only the missed opportunity with ZFS, but now the problems of APFS not being used properly. A truly incredible situation.
  5. When I played with the fresh install I found that some things were really screwed up. For example:
    • Stage Manager is trash for anyone with more than one display. The only useful way to use macOS is still with extended displays and WITHOUT separate Spaces for each display. Apple does not allow Stage Manager to even work with the extended displays situation and frankly Stage Manager simply has little to no value even if you intend to use it for focused mode when you require any other monitors.
    • The new system Settings is enormously impotent and foreign. They really didn't think this through fully and are missing a lot of functionality. They should have, at the very least, provided BOTH methods of configuration since the new Settings app also feels enormously disorganized and even searching for features is not immediately fruitful. It's simply not ready for primetime usage - not to mention that it just doesn't fit UX parameters for non-iPhone/iPad usage.
    • An Asus monitor that works perfectly on Monterey and is identical to a second monitor on the system does not allow for recognition of full resolution at the correct refresh rate when used with a DisplayPort adapter. HDMI works, but then macOS continues to have the monitor schizophrenia problem where it can't determine which monitor is which when they have the same model number (no fault of Apple per se), but the resolution + refresh situation IS faultable to Apple.
I could go on about various other points and problems, but I just don't have any more time and my frustration level is over 9,000.

Full recovery to Monterey was a painful process. Due to some fashion in which Ventura screwed up the recovery partition and so forth, reinstallation required erasure of the ENTIRE drive, network access (sadly I had to authenticate my machine with Apple, which is ridiculous and scary in and of itself and should not be required), and then downloading of Monterey again... Plus a 30 hour Migration step.

I will not be moving this machine to Ventura and Apple has very much dropped a significant level in terms of trust for our company. We have several Apple Silicon machines now that we are worried about in terms of the future and Apple's clear inability to make good decisions and lacking of actual quality assurance processes.

To boot, their Feedback / RADAR system has been very poor over the last couple years too. Apple's support/engineering department has been abysmal in responding to many and various reports. Someone needs to pull them out of the swirling toilet basin desperately before they are simply no different than Microsoft.
 
I'm sorry @ssmed, but I also work on Windows systems daily and maintain some rather large installation bases. I have to say that this is not my experience. I cannot AT ALL trust Microsoft Windows 10 or 11. They blow up regularly and are entirely unreliable. We simply have no reasonable options in relation to Microsoft being possible to move to.

Apple needs to step back and get to its roots. Their leadership has been just garbage for the past decade now - total garbage. I have heard horror stories of CoreOS (kernel) devs that wander the hallways aimlessly due to lack of direction and focus in the kernel and core areas of the OS. Internally folks at Apple are not even happy with Apple leadership, but they can't say anything publicly of course. It's very sad. They get paid enough to just suck it up and realize that macOS is completely lacking and simply getting no real proper attention compared to iOS/iPadOS (which again are just investor motivated).
 
Well folks, just wanted to relate some experiences I've had in my small foray into Ventura and am done with this iteration of the OS it appears. A few major halting / critical points on an M1 Max system (also, just to be clear, I'm not a novice user - I've been a goto guy that has helped Apple "Geniuses" over the years when they can't figure things out) :

  1. Be aware that the upgrade can seriously fail. I tried both 13.0 and 13.1 beta. The system, while performing an upgrade, had an infinite Apple logo reboot loop that went into recovery mode after several reboot attempts. I went through several troubleshooting steps that I won't document here. USB backups don't boot so the recovery process is HORRIFIC now for Apple. Removing the ability to boot to USB drives is a nightmare level mistake by Apple. I do not trust Apple whatsoever anymore, even though their brand of OS is still the lesser of the proverbial "poisons" yet still (not a compliment, just an observation).
  2. Installed from scratch, but restore of previous system settings failed for some various obscure/unclear reasons. This situation descended into chaos when I found that the Recovery tool no longer worked and no associated tools work. This mode also incorrectly detected my system volume as being encrypted and no usernames or passwords that are system admins/owners would actually authenticate with the actually correct password. Things are seriously broken when they break with the recovery situation.
  3. My Time Machine backup did not work properly. It was detected and all seemed well with it, but the system, again, for some obscure and non-clear reason, failed to use it. I had to use a secondary backup made with Super Duper, BUT that was a ridiculous process. It took 30 hours to restore the 7tb+ of data.
  4. APFS Snapshots are a steaming mess. Apple is not using APFS snapshots properly / appropriately; I could not rollback on the upgrade system to to Monterey. This is an enormous problem and oversight / missed opportunity by Apple and is truly baffling. I've had some people who know the internal goings on at Apple express extreme frustration for not only the missed opportunity with ZFS, but now the problems of APFS not being used properly. A truly incredible situation.
  5. When I played with the fresh install I found that some things were really screwed up. For example:
    • Stage Manager is trash for anyone with more than one display. The only useful way to use macOS is still with extended displays and WITHOUT separate Spaces for each display. Apple does not allow Stage Manager to even work with the extended displays situation and frankly Stage Manager simply has little to no value even if you intend to use it for focused mode when you require any other monitors.
    • The new system Settings is enormously impotent and foreign. They really didn't think this through fully and are missing a lot of functionality. They should have, at the very least, provided BOTH methods of configuration since the new Settings app also feels enormously disorganized and even searching for features is not immediately fruitful. It's simply not ready for primetime usage - not to mention that it just doesn't fit UX parameters for non-iPhone/iPad usage.
    • An Asus monitor that works perfectly on Monterey and is identical to a second monitor on the system does not allow for recognition of full resolution at the correct refresh rate when used with a DisplayPort adapter. HDMI works, but then macOS continues to have the monitor schizophrenia problem where it can't determine which monitor is which when they have the same model number (no fault of Apple per se), but the resolution + refresh situation IS faultable to Apple.
I could go on about various other points and problems, but I just don't have any more time and my frustration level is over 9,000.

Full recovery to Monterey was a painful process. Due to some fashion in which Ventura screwed up the recovery partition and so forth, reinstallation required erasure of the ENTIRE drive, network access (sadly I had to authenticate my machine with Apple, which is ridiculous and scary in and of itself and should not be required), and then downloading of Monterey again... Plus a 30 hour Migration step.

I will not be moving this machine to Ventura and Apple has very much dropped a significant level in terms of trust for our company. We have several Apple Silicon machines now that we are worried about in terms of the future and Apple's clear inability to make good decisions and lacking of actual quality assurance processes.

To boot, their Feedback / RADAR system has been very poor over the last couple years too. Apple's support/engineering department has been abysmal in responding to many and various reports. Someone needs to pull them out of the swirling toilet basin desperately before they are simply no different than Microsoft.
I’ve been missing the “ No new features” announcement in Snow Leopard days since Yosemite. The macOS is not elegant as silk, not smooth as butter, nor even visually professional as a desktop operating system. But there is no other choice though.
 
We are still back to the old, "they should NOT be doing yearly releases of OS". There isn't much in Ventura that a patch or service pack or whatever they were called in the OSX days that could bring in new features.
 
Last edited:
it's this way with every OS release; people complaining how 'apple has fallen off', 'worst OS ever'... a lot of the sky is falling posts. my theory is... with the next OS, people who hated ventura will be remembering how good it was... 🤣
There is the chance that it's because each OS version is worse than the last. "Better" is often remembered as "good". The last release would always be the worst ever.

Depending on how one uses the OS, they'll notice varying degrees of degradation. It just depends on the the kind of bugs you trip over. (They might instead notice improvement, if bugs important to them are fixed.) I don't recall much degradation during the transition between previous OS versions. But this time around, it's startling how drastic it is. I would be tempted to say that this is the worst MacOS ever in terms of bugs and general reliability.

The thing about bugs, if someone doesn't encounter them, they might think they don't exist. For example, if most of the time is spent using non-Apple software, the OS can seem pretty bug free.

Consider the recent bug I reported on this thread - that restore in TimeMachine doesn't work correctly. That outrageous bug is evidence that a post like "Ventura is fine; I'm not having any issues" needs to be reconsidered. Saying everything is fine, without adding ones voice and expressing dismay at such a bug, is a disservice. The bar only goes as low as people let it go. People who report bugs and complain about them are helping. People who complain about people complaining are hurting.

Consider another bug. Imagine someone on an earlier release of Ventura who set stealth on in System Settings because they were connecting to an untrusted network. They were just hit with a major bug and never knew it - stealth didn't turn on. Such a person reporting everything was fine in the OS back then meant that they failed badly in their responsibility of due diligence. It's kind of user feedback malpractice.
 
Ever since Winblows Vista, Microsoft has been a hot mess. Security holes the size you could fit a cargo ship thru, basically forced to use a security suite, updates that constantly break, constant slowness, forced updates to newer versions that are not finished when released, horrible ui, I can go on but I think it should be obvious which hardware and OS is far superior. APPLE RULES.
I stopped reading right here. Using such a term tells me what's to follow will be lacking maturity and facts.
 
Last edited:
Totally agree, I’ve just received my mini m2 Pro. I think is the best hardware ever but unfortunately with the worst software ever. It’s strange but I enjoy way more using my old 2012 mini with High Sierra. Even if it is noticeable slower, it feels rock solid and predictable. Since big sur specially macOS is too colorful and full of useless features that only gives more complexity and bugs to the system. Apple needs to step back, and focus on what it matters, in offering an stable and predictable system and forget about “keynote-only” features.
 
@chabig you're correct - I wanted to offer a word of warning to those who care and may not have the time to futz around with a very, very bad release from Apple. Fwiw, my bg is CS and I've done systems level / OS dev (even some kernel work on a toy from back in the day), so I suppose you could say that I do know a thing or two. I definitely am not happy whatsoever with MS's ideals and Linux is a schizo nightmare sadly and thanks to Microshaft's tampering in the UI department in the early days to keep it fragmented. Simply put: macOS is the lesser of the evils - but make no mistake, it is still not actually good.

@casperes1996 I do run with SIP disabled and so forth, but still that would not function as it used to. Not sure how you've been able to enable this, but I've completely relaxed everything that can be relaxed as far as I can find and tell. Super Duper should be able to do the job for Monterey as well from my discussions with the dev, etc. but nope - it simply will not boot.
 
I stopped reading right here. Using such a term tells me what's to follow will be lacking in maturity and facts.
Yeah, his rant is so 1990's. Windows is a rock solid OS that is very stable. Heck I only reboot the PC when it installs an update and requires a reboot. I use it as my gaming platform of choice. I install and uninstall games and other stuff quite frequently and the PC just works as well and fast as it did 2 years ago. When it comes down to OS's it really boils down to preference but to call it Winblows just shows the individual has already made up their minds. It would be akin to me calling macOS a Fischer Price toy operating system that has been locked and dumbed down for its users. Neither is true.
 
I took a chance, updated my 2018 MacMini to 13.5 and can say that external display to my 49" ultra-wide Dell U4919DW monitor works fine (USB-C to DP cable), and also no issues encountered with the two old 20" wide flat-panel displays on either side of the ultra-wide.

Keeping my fingers crossed it stays working as it is supposed to.

On closer observation, my 2018 MacMini updated to MacOS Ventura 13.5.1 is not "working fine" with my 49" ultra-wide Dell U4919DW monitor; for some bizarre reason Ventura does not recognize the default resolution to be 5120x1440 (it thinks the default resolution is 2560x720).
So that means Ventura is most likely doing some scaling and thus not displaying as optimal natural resolution.

Dell's manual clearly states the U4919DW native resolution is 5120x1440 and Monterey clearly recognized it to be that as well - only Ventura seems to have gone backwards in time to when ultra-wide displays didn't exist yet.

Screenshot-20230818_Dell-U4919DW.png


And . . . I just don't understand why Apple insists to force MacOS to use System Settings that is formatted for the physically much smaller iPhone display size - on the Mac it won't even resize horizontally !
At least the previous System Preferences took advantage of the Mac's much larger physical display size to make it much easier to see all the configurations and navigate efficiently.
This System Settings is just completely unintuitive on the Mac.
 
Well folks, just wanted to relate some experiences I've had in my small foray into Ventura and am done with this iteration of the OS it appears.
Agreed, is mostly rubbish & Apple-sharholder /walled garden centric; far less so about customers or existing long term users. Another element you didn't mention: support for existing 3rd party pro applications (film, audio etc), plug-ins, drivers, VIs etc. Dreadful, Apple clearly only care for their own BS & certainly not for those who do professional work (with other than theit own somewhat odd Logic, FCPX etc).
 
I guess I'm in the lucky minority who was able to upgrade to Ventura with no problem. With that being said, it's been pretty buggy and I don't like some of the choices made in design.

I don't want my desktop to feel like iOS. I just don't. I have two ultra-wides that I work on and prefer that my Operating System behave like a proper desktop os instead of an oversized version of iOS.

There are some great features with the OS and hopefully the engineers fix this **** before they go on holiday vacation. It's pretty obvious that this should have been delayed until next year. It's kind of half-baked.
 
I'll give you the advice a friend did many years ago; With Apple better stay one OS behind, you still get a new OS without all the issues and drama...

FWIW I only updated to Monterey very recently, Ventura I won't remotely consider until it's close to final release.

Q-6
So far I have seen only features I don't like - the new system settings - and plenty of features that mean nothing to me. I may stay 2 releases behind just to put off the changes as long as possible.

The evolution of OSX since ~ 2015 is about the best demonstration of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" that I've ever seen.
 
Last edited:
Ventura is the worst release of MacOS I can remember since I started with 10.5. I am so curious why it's so bad:

1. When I drag windows to another monitor the windows just disappear until I let go of the cursor

2. when I go to file > open on many apps like firefox, the popup doesnt display BUT IT WILL display if I open and collapse mission control for some reason

3. every time I wake from sleep I get bombarded by the same "background items added" notifications over and over. 8 of them!!!

4. The apple music app is terrible. Randomly sound will just die until I reset the track. Other times sound is incredibly stuttery or just generally buggy.

5. If you use stage manager and restart your mac then it reopens all windows but not in the same staged groups s they were in before. Very unpolished.

6. In stage manager if I have two windows for the same app in two different groups on two different monitors, and I open one of those groups on monitor A, then monitor B automatically switches to its group that has a window for that app.....

And also the settings app is just awful! For example lets say you want to manage when your computer shows the screensaver and when it sleeps. Before this was just in the power section. Now it's spread across THREE SECTIONS. Screen saver is its own section, if you want to configure when the screensaver shows then its randomly just in the lock screen section, and lastly if you want to prevent the computer from sleeping its under displays.... I don't even...
 
And . . . I just don't understand why Apple insists to force MacOS to use System Settings that is formatted for the physically much smaller iPhone display size - on the Mac it won't even resize horizontally !
At least the previous System Preferences took advantage of the Mac's much larger physical display size to make it much easier to see all the configurations and navigate efficiently.
This System Settings is just completely unintuitive on the Mac.
I really, really, really agree with you. I had to help a friend on Ventura today and that was a horrible System Settings experience. System Preferences is 100x better in every way. Makes no sense for the Mac. I sure hope people are leaving a ton of feedback directly to Apple about that!
 
Ventura is perfectly fine

Ha?

Screenshot-20230912_Dell-U4919DW_MacOS-13-5-2-DisplaySettingResolutionDefault.png


This Dell U4919DW default resolution is 5120x1440 (see User Guide on left in above image).
  • Monterey had that correctly.
  • Since Ventura 13.2 it did not support that resolution, then only as low resolution, then a lot of tweaking and work-arounds to get it to finally show in native resolution (each reboot required tweaking) . . .
  • But still Ventura 13.5.2 does not recognize 5120x1440 as the default resolution (see System Settings on right side in above image).
  • And this problem is not only for the Dell U4919DW, but also other 49 inch ultra-wide models from Samsung etc also had this problem.
And that is not the only Ventura issue out there. But this is special for me, since I got this 49 inch ultra-wide and never expected that Apple MacOS Ventura would end up unable to support a display that has been around for years and fully supported without even a hiccup in Monterey.

I have been using Mac OS X since it first came out at the beginning of this millennium, being a BSD unix sysadm in the past I preferred OS X versus OS 9 and never looked back. Not once have I had any serious problems with a newly released OS X nor MacOS 11 onwards . . . until Ventura.

From Apple's perspective, Ventura represents a significant OS architecture change, as much of the code to support older hardware has been removed to streamline 'lighten' the system code base. Obviously the code was not as cleanly made as envisioned and some fundamental functionalities got truncated or inadvertently removed that regression testing didn't catch.

MacOS Sonoma will go even further in removing hardware code, and eventually all Intel hardware code will be removed in a few years. At that point hopefully Apple will be able to sort out the serious flaws affecting silicon based hardware as well.

Monterey is probably the last MacOS to comprehensivley support both Intel and silicon, while Ventura is best considered a first-step transitional MacOS distancing Intel hardware.

Don't get me wrong, I am not bashing Ventura, I am just reacting to the statement 'Ventura is perfectly fine', since it is not, and hoping that it will eventually do what it is supposed to do and do it well.

Sorry for the long irritating post.
 
Last edited:
Sadly this does not work @KoolAid-Drink on my MacBookPro18,2. Intels still work it appears and given this insanity my old MacPro5,1 had to be my primary driver for three days with Monterey via OCLP. So grateful for the ongoing OCLP effort saving the Intel space for now!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.