Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

anotherarunan

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Sep 18, 2007
372
61
London, United Kingdom (UK)
Hey guys...apologies if this is in the wrong section. But i just wanted to know if there was a noticeable difference when hooking up a macbook to a DVI monitor compared to a VGA monitor.

Cheers.
 
DVI is newer, digital based. It'll produce more exact colors.
VGA is older, it can be calibrated.. it's somewhat cheeper. And if you have a Macbook Pro, you need to use the DVI->VGA adapter that it comes with.

Basically, if you have to be asking, you won't notice a difference.
 
DVI is newer, digital based. It'll produce more exact colors.
VGA is older, it can be calibrated.. it's somewhat cheeper. And if you have a Macbook Pro, you need to use the DVI->VGA adapter that it comes with.

Basically, if you have to be asking, you won't notice a difference.

In theory you're right, I agree with you... but it sounds like he's asking if anyone's tried to see the difference first hand on the MB specifically.
Case in point: On audio/video gear, I've seen component outputs look much better that HDMI... It seems to greatly depend on the quality of the components, not so much on the type of connection!
 
yeah...all i was wondering was if i got a VGA monitor..would i be that much worse off? or is getting a DVI monitor in this day and age..an absolute must? (similar like buying a non-hd tv?)

No, it is not an absolute must. And neither is getting an HDTV. It is recommended to get an HDTV since they really are no longer massively cost prohibitive, and the media that can take advantage of them is prevalent.

What is an absolute must in this day in age is if you are getting a new TV, is to get a digital TV (does not preclude SDTVs)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.