Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Akula971

macrumors regular
Original poster
Aug 25, 2006
164
0
Perfidious Albion
I've searched the forums and can't find anyone who has tried both. At the moment I reboot (via bootcamp) into windows XP for my gaming fix. I play mainly steam games and Silent Hunter, FarCry and Crysis. However XP does not see all my RAM (16GB), whilst I'm sure Vista 64 would. The question I have to ask is would it make any real difference to the games at all? I run a 2008 2.8GHz MacPro with an 8800 card. Does 64 bit make much of a difference or DX10 for that matter?

If you've tried both I'd be interested to know your thoughts.

Thank you

Derek
 

MRU

macrumors Penryn
Aug 23, 2005
25,370
8,952
a better place
Download the 30 day trial of Vista 64 bit and compare it to your current XP experience.

If it's much improved spend the cash and buy a license. If not... delete....
 

odinsride

macrumors 65816
Apr 11, 2007
1,149
3
Vista 64 is pretty decent for gaming (and that's about it ;))

I have a gaming rig with C2Q 9450, 8gb ram, a Velociraptor, and an 8800 gts, with Vista 64 bit Ultimate...games run so well on it
 

Dorfdad

macrumors 6502
Oct 26, 2007
474
54
Well I have to toss my hat in here, I used XP and than switched to Vista 32 bit for two reasons..


#1. Vista 64 Bit is not supported and I can not find anywhere to get the proper boot camp drivers to support 2007 Imacs 2.4 Gig with Radeon 2600 video card. If you know a link please email me from what I understand you need a copy from the newest MacPro laptops for these drivers.

#2. XP only supports 2 gigs of ram I believe, Vista 32 seems 4 but only uses 3.5 and if you have a 256 or 512 Video card you only have 3 gigs of ram left for gaming. with SP1 Vista 32 is a complete OS faster than XP and nicer!

I know people will say apple has the latest boot camp drivers on there site, but unless you have tried this your wrong. Those drivers are not for the iMAC's.. You need the MACPRO drivers from this year

if you can prove me otherwise please feel free to I would love to get Vista 64 working for full use of 4 GIGS of ram..
 

Infrared

macrumors 68000
Mar 28, 2007
1,715
65

Tex-Twil

macrumors 68030
May 28, 2008
2,501
15
Berlin
Hello,
I'm running Vista 64bits on my new MBP (see signature) and I'm actually considering instaling XP 32 bits because ... well I dont like Vista that much.

I would be interested in seeing someone's 3D Mark 06 score on XP with the same MBP. My score is 5751

cheers,
Tex
 

Akula971

macrumors regular
Original poster
Aug 25, 2006
164
0
Perfidious Albion
I took the plunge

Well I got the 64 bit ultimate version. It wouldn't install under boot camp, it got to the "which disk to install to" and said that there where no disks suitable or that the disk I selected was in "GPT" format or something or other. So I reformatted the drive in XP and just booted from the DVD when the machine restarted. It then installed OK. I then tried to run Silent Hunter III, which just gave a warning after it installed that it would only run on a XP,2000, ME, etc. Searched the net and found out it was the copy protection stuff DVD checker thingy. I installed a no CD crack and it ran fine. It loads quicker, runs the same. I do find the "confirm/allow" thing a bit annoying. Vista rates the machine as a 5.6 for HD performance and 5.6 for everything else. So far so good. There are so many things that I see in Vista that just make me think, Oh thats just like Tiger!
 

thewright1

macrumors regular
Apr 3, 2008
100
0
This is some good info you all. I was stuck between which OS to install, so I think I'll go with Vista 64 SP1.
 

drichards

macrumors 6502a
Nov 30, 2008
803
0
The product(RED) edition of Vista64 is on sale at Microsoft's super secret site for $65 as long as you have a .edu email, tru the end of December for US customers.
 

Archandy

macrumors newbie
Sep 13, 2007
27
0
I'm also weighing up the advantages / cons of having Vista64 or XPSP3 for gaming / rendering

From what I've learned , Vista 64 now has drivers for most apps, and it's logical to use Vista64 seeing as it can use more RAM available to it. Plus its the future. Well, actually, maybe not......

In my hunt for reviews about Vista64 I found out about Windows 7.
Excuse my ignorance, but what the...Vista will be replaced already???

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/29/technology/business-computing/29soft.html
 

drichards

macrumors 6502a
Nov 30, 2008
803
0
Windows 7 will be a good upgrade from Vista, use less resources, be able to perform better on low end machines, and it has alot of newer integrated apps. Its speculated that the os will drop legacy support entirely, which should piss off IT guys.
 

Tex-Twil

macrumors 68030
May 28, 2008
2,501
15
Berlin
Excuse my ignorance, but what the...Vista will be replaced already???

Well it is far from being ready but yes, Microsoft is working on it and I think that a first public beta should be available soon.

Based on my own experience, I really prefer XP 32bits rather that Vista 64bits for gaming. I got a better 3D Mark score but I also find XP just faster even if it uses only 3GB out of the 4 that my MBP has.
 

drichards

macrumors 6502a
Nov 30, 2008
803
0
In XP, an individual program can only access 2GB of ram, it wouldn't make much of a difference then even if the OS could see 4GB.
 

Joker2206

macrumors newbie
Dec 16, 2008
14
0
I used All of Vista and XP versions. It means 4 versions.
So.... XP 32 definetly if you want fast OS and better for gaming than Vista.

There are many topics on the internet that say Vista sucks for gaming if you use Super prefetch, but if you disable it then your OS boots very slow and every application you start takes more time.
Of course, if you use at least 2 HD's in Raid, you get vista to good performance (considering you have bunch of ram already).

Vista 64 should be future, but most of applications don't use 64-bit code, so only advantage of 64-bit OS is it can take more memory, but even then you can use 64 XP which is more stable and faster then 64 Vista.

You can try all of this by yourself. I'm using 2 computers, 1 uses raid, 1 not and the one that doesn't use vista speed simply can be called vista slow.

XP 32 bit can accept up to 3.5 Gb of ram, Vista 32 up to 4 I think, but any 64 version has much greater limit.

So, If you have less then 4 Gb stick to 32 XP, otherwise you can try XP or 64 Vista, depending you want nice and fancy-resource-hungry looking vista or great working XP. Vista has some advantages, but for now, still XP.

I switched back to XP and will never come back to Vista...Maybe windows 7 if it gets good optimization.

I must mention, i get blue screen on Vista without reason. Nothing was working, just desktop standing (this was 32-bit Vista).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.