Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

twoodcc

macrumors P6
Original poster
Feb 3, 2005
15,307
26
Right side of wrong
so i installed vista 32-bit on my mac pro, and it only sees 2GB of ram, but i have 14 GB! do i have to have 64-bit for it to see more ram?
 

Stridder44

macrumors 68040
Mar 24, 2003
3,973
198
California
but why? leopard sees all of it

*sigh*

Ok. A 32-bit OS can only see up to 4 GB of RAM (but only 3.5 or less will be available because PCI cards and whatnot take up some of that addressing space). Applications can also only use no more than 2 GB of RAM. With a 64-bit OS, all these problems are gone. Leopard is 64-bit. Vista comes in 64-bit, but you don't have it (by the way, Vista 64 is awesome).
 

Dustman

macrumors 65816
Apr 17, 2007
1,381
238
but why? leopard sees all of it

Because Microsoft believes in having 5 different editions, in either 32-Bit and 64-Bit varieties. An "all in one" package is just too much for them to be able to handle. You'd be able to see all 14 GB in a 64-Bit version of windows, either XP or Vista.

Note that XP x64 would probably be a b**ch to install due to lack of drivers.
 

twoodcc

macrumors P6
Original poster
Feb 3, 2005
15,307
26
Right side of wrong
*sigh*

Ok. A 32-bit OS can only see up to 4 GB of RAM (but only 3.5 or less will be available because PCI cards and whatnot take up some of that addressing space). Applications can also only use no more than 2 GB of RAM. With a 64-bit OS, all these problems are gone. Leopard is 64-bit. Vista comes in 64-bit, but you don't have it (by the way, Vista 64 is awesome).

Because Microsoft believes in having 5 different editions, in either 32-Bit and 64-Bit varieties. An "all in one" package is just too much for them to be able to handle. You'd be able to see all 14 GB in a 64-Bit version of windows, either XP or Vista.

Note that XP x64 would probably be a b**ch to install due to lack of drivers.


thanks for the replies. it seems that vista should at least see 3GB of RAM though.
 

Stridder44

macrumors 68040
Mar 24, 2003
3,973
198
California
thanks for the replies. it seems that vista should at least see 3GB of RAM though.

Vista 32, yes. That's why it sucks. Any new(ish) computer is very much able to run Vista 64, which is much better (not just because of the memory addressing limitations). The difference really does feel like night and day.

wait, so can i run 32-bit apps in 64-bit Vista?

also, are there any bootcamp drivers for 64-bit vista?

Yes, pretty much any 32-bit app. can run in Vista64. Games, of any age, whatever. As far as drivers go, this is where you might want to give the finger to Apple. Boot Camp is only supportive of Vista 64 for new (early 2008 model) Macs apparently. Hopefully this will change soon, but I've read many success stories about people getting Vista 64 to work perfectly on their system even if their Mac is not an early-2008 model.
 

twoodcc

macrumors P6
Original poster
Feb 3, 2005
15,307
26
Right side of wrong
Vista 32, yes. That's why it sucks. Any new(ish) computer is very much able to run Vista 64, which is much better (not just because of the memory addressing limitations). The difference really does feel like night and day.



Yes, pretty much any 32-bit app. can run in Vista64. Games, of any age, whatever. As far as drivers go, this is where you might want to give the finger to Apple. Boot Camp is only supportive of Vista 64 for new (early 2008 model) Macs apparently. Hopefully this will change soon, but I've read many success stories about people getting Vista 64 to work perfectly on their system even if their Mac is not an early-2008 model.

thanks. i'm going to try and install it. wish me luck
 

twoodcc

macrumors P6
Original poster
Feb 3, 2005
15,307
26
Right side of wrong
No problem. Let us know if you have any issues.

well i got it installed and everything, but the bootcamp drivers aren't working. i can't eject the disk with the button on the keyboard.

i installed the bootcamp drivers that are on the leopard disk, but it won't install the latest 2.1 drivers.
 

twoodcc

macrumors P6
Original poster
Feb 3, 2005
15,307
26
Right side of wrong
well i was able to get the 64-bit bootcamp, but after installing, now i have 2 bootcamp things in the bottom right of the taskbar. is this gonna give me problems?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.