Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

mms

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Oct 8, 2003
784
0
CA
I'm planning to install Windows through Boot Camp on a brand new MacBook. Since I have never owned a Windows machine before, i'll be getting a brand new license. That means it should cost the same for me to get Vista or XP and that I will be buying a full version, not an upgrade version.

That being said, which OS should I choose? My main concern is that Vista may not fully support or work with some of the hardware (specifically the GMA950) since the only reason why I am installing Windows is for games. However, I'm leaning towards Vista because it will be upgraded more in the future.

Also, will I be fine with Vista/XP Home or is there a reason to get one of the pricier ones? Keep in mind that I am a lifelong Mac user and I know very little about Windows (it doesn't help that Microsoft makes it super confusing with multiple types of XPs and different pricing schemes).
 

0007776

Suspended
Jul 11, 2006
6,473
8,170
Somewhere
For games go with XP I hope that you do realize that the macbooks graphics are not very good for gaming though.
 

mms

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Oct 8, 2003
784
0
CA
I understand that but I've already accepted that part.

Is XP that much better? Why? If it's because of the drivers, I would think that performance in Vista will get better as they are updated. Or does Microsoft not bother doing that?
 

Eidorian

macrumors Penryn
Mar 23, 2005
29,190
386
Indianapolis
I'd go with XP for now. Search for forums for posts on the GMA 950. I bet I show up in at least 70% of them. :rolleyes:

There's less of a performance drop in XP then with Vista. (Overall and in frames per second.)
 

Winterfell

macrumors regular
Apr 3, 2007
150
0
Tulsa, Oklahoma
At the moment, and for the foreseeable future, XP is still the better gaming platform. But at some point down the road Vista will most likely eclipse XP as the preferred of the two platforms for gaming (probably around the time of the first service pack), just because more hardware will be able to keep Vista's ravenous resource hunger happy, and games will increasingly make use of Direct X 10, which is Vista-only (in typical Microsoft lock-in/forced-upgrade style).
 

Mav451

macrumors 68000
Jul 1, 2003
1,657
1
Maryland
I'd go with XP for now. Search for forums for posts on the GMA 950. I bet I show up in at least 70% of them. :rolleyes:

There's less of a performance drop in XP then with Vista. (Overall and in frames per second.)

Maturity in the drivers, mon ami. I didn't even go to XP until nearly SP1 and even then I wouldn't recommend it. Stay with the mature platform, and you will have the least headaches.

Also, as has been iterated, until there are "killer apps" or DX10 exclusives out in the wild, there's simply no reason to go Vista at all.
 

METOO999

macrumors regular
Apr 25, 2007
203
0
I tried Vista just to see what it looked like, but the sheen wore off after I couldn't play or had problems with many older games. XP is more compatible right now.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.