Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

J232022

macrumors member
Original poster
Nov 3, 2014
62
0
Is anybody really going to buy a Apple Watch and actually use it ? I just don't see the point of it . I think a watch should just be a watch . This seems to me to be a apple newton like product . Even though I still think the Apple Newton is awesome .
 

J232022

macrumors member
Original poster
Nov 3, 2014
62
0
Probably. I'm pretty sure I want a stainless one. It's really going to come down to pricing.



Then buy a regular watch.

I can see why people want it because it is a apple product , but I really do not think it is going to be very successful , just look at the android watches there basically the exact same thing and nobody uses them . I do not think the technology is good enough yet to make a great smart watch device . I think apple made the watch because people are saying they can not innovate anymore which I think is not true at all just look at the retina imac and the mac pro those are very cool . The apple watch looks like a rushed product , I doubt Steve Jobs would have released a watch this early because it is just not ready yet . It looks to me like a beta device . I love apple and there products but I just wish they would focus more on the mac products .
 
Last edited:

Pootan

macrumors member
Oct 28, 2014
57
0
I think it would be great as a dev kit though, probably worth while to get your hands in the market while its young, look at when there were few apps in the App Store, even crud apps sold crazy.
 

T5BRICK

macrumors G3
Aug 3, 2006
8,313
2,387
Oregon
I can see why people want it because it is a apple product , but I really do not think it is going to be very successful , just look at the android watches there basically the exact same thing and nobody uses them . I do not think the technology is good enough yet to make a great smart watch device .

People said the same thing about the iPod when it was released.

I think apple made the watch because people are saying they can not innovate anymore which I think is not true at all just look at the retina imac and the mac pro those are very cool .

Apple made the watch because they want to make money. The retina iMac is cool, but hardly innovative. I also like the Mac pro, but it really does make a lot of compromises.

The apple watch looks like a rushed product , I doubt Steve Jobs would have released a watch this early because it is just not ready yet . It looks to me like a beta device . I love apple and there products but I just wish they would focus more on the mac products .

The original iPhone was announced 6 months prior to the day it shipped. The hardware and software were so unstable that Steve Jobs had a special routine he had to follow and he used multiple phones during the presentation just so nothing went wrong.

Mac products don't make Apple as much money. They've found their cash cow and I can't really fault them for sticking with it.
 

Technodynamic

macrumors 6502
Jul 25, 2012
371
81
I do. just wish the stainless steel one was about $100 less.

It's everything I had wanted and pondered it could be over the last year, year and a half.... and more. If you don't see any purpose in the features your vision is narrow.

It augments your phone and makes daily life a notch simpler in many ways. answering calls easily, ease of directions, ease of notifications without having to whip your phone out of your pocket every time, all the health app stuff.

Sounds like you didn't watch the Apple promo video or are pretending like those features don't matter.
 

Julien

macrumors G4
Jun 30, 2007
11,847
5,441
Atlanta
the rumored $500 starting price tag (for stainless)

While that is the lowest rumored starting price (and most recent) there are other credible rumors as high as $1000 for the SS. However there is NO chance of a starting price (remember starting price will be with the fluoroelastomer band too) at just $400. With stainless, sapphire, and a ceramic coated back it will definitely push the SS will above a $50 premium over the Sport.
 

chasemac

macrumors 6502a
Jan 30, 2005
784
121
In a house.
I am not keen on wearing a watch and so far I am not that impressed. It appears to be a typical intro product for Apple. We don't know the actual prices and it will most certainly lack features with the first gen. So I will wait until this has "developed into something more" to even consider it because right now this watch offers nothing of value for me.
 

J232022

macrumors member
Original poster
Nov 3, 2014
62
0
People said the same thing about the iPod when it was released.



Apple made the watch because they want to make money. The retina iMac is cool, but hardly innovative. I also like the Mac pro, but it really does make a lot of compromises.



The original iPhone was announced 6 months prior to the day it shipped. The hardware and software were so unstable that Steve Jobs had a special routine he had to follow and he used multiple phones during the presentation just so nothing went wrong.

Mac products don't make Apple as much money. They've found their cash cow and I can't really fault them for sticking with it.

I still think the Apple watch is going to be a failed product . This is not reinventing the watch like they did with there other products I just do not see it going anywhere . Maybe I am wrong but I just do not think it is going anywhere it is just not a finished product and I think it is very much a beta product .
 

Pootan

macrumors member
Oct 28, 2014
57
0
I still think the Apple watch is going to be a failed product . This is not reinventing the watch like they did with there other products I just do not see it going anywhere . Maybe I am wrong but I just do not think it is going anywhere it is just not a finished product and I think it is very much a beta product .

Ironically, failure and limited production run would make it more desirable for some watch/apple collectors, like the g4 cube. And it's not going nowhere, it'll go in to my watch display case :cool:
 

Piggie

macrumors G3
Feb 23, 2010
9,182
4,112
People also expected the iPod, iPhone and iPad to be the next Newton. You're sounding like a broken record.

To be fair, there were obvious and good uses for those products.

People wanted to have music to take around with them and always have done since transistor radios then walkmans

People have wanted to have a communications device, and if it can also play music and take photo's even better.

People have for years been dreaming of tablet thin computers, having been shown off in Sci Fi films for decades, something small, thin and light to do things on that are too hard to do on a tiny screen.

With the watch, people have spend the last couple of decades getting rid of them, and stopping wearing them, as they now carry the phone which makes the watch redundant for many.
Other than it not being on your wrist, the phone does everything a watch can do and a million other things.

Not only that, you pretty much still need to carry the phone to use the watch.

Unlike the others it's not it's own product, just an accessory.

Whilst I'm sure it will sell to many, it's not such a MUST HAVE device as the others.
 

Rlong405

macrumors member
Sep 11, 2013
91
11
Uk
The original iPhone was announced 6 months prior to the day it shipped. The hardware and software were so unstable that Steve Jobs had a special routine he had to follow and he used multiple phones during the presentation just so nothing went wrong.

Anyone got a link to the article which described that keynote. Was a really interesting read. I believe they hard coded full signal bars into the phone too cause they would keep dropping down to no service every few minutes.
 

J232022

macrumors member
Original poster
Nov 3, 2014
62
0
Ironically, failure and limited production run would make it more desirable for some watch/apple collectors, like the g4 cube. And it's not going nowhere, it'll go in to my watch display case :cool:

I want a intel based Mac Cube , those things where a work of art . It is too bad the cube failed .
 

matrix07

macrumors G3
Jun 24, 2010
8,226
4,894
To be fair, there were obvious and good uses for those products.

People wanted to have music to take around with them and always have done since transistor radios then walkmans

People have wanted to have a communications device, and if it can also play music and take photo's even better.

People have for years been dreaming of tablet thin computers, having been shown off in Sci Fi films for decades, something small, thin and light to do things on that are too hard to do on a tiny screen.

With the watch, people have spend the last couple of decades getting rid of them, and stopping wearing them, as they now carry the phone which makes the watch redundant for many.
Other than it not being on your wrist, the phone does everything a watch can do and a million other things.

Not only that, you pretty much still need to carry the phone to use the watch.

Unlike the others it's not it's own product, just an accessory.

Whilst I'm sure it will sell to many, it's not such a MUST HAVE device as the others.

'Tis true. Not prevented SO MANY people out there predicting doom though. :)
 

aristobrat

macrumors G5
Oct 14, 2005
12,292
1,403
I still think the Apple watch is going to be a failed product . This is not reinventing the watch like they did with there other products I just do not see it going anywhere . Maybe I am wrong but I just do not think it is going anywhere it is just not a finished product and I think it is very much a beta product .
Perhaps you'll be right, but most of what you're saying sounds like the stuff said back in 2001 when the iPod was announced. Read the infamous thread 500 here when you have a chance, it's a hoot!

Sounds very revolutionary to me.

hey - heres an idea Apple - rather than enter the world of gimmicks and toys, why dont you spend a little more time sorting out your pathetically expensive and crap server line up?
or are you really aiming to become a glorified consumer gimmicks firm?

I'd call it the Cube 2.0 as it wont sell, and be killed off in a short time...and it's not really functional.

Uuhh Steve, can I have a PDA now?

This isn't revoltionary!
I still can't believe this! All this hype for something so ridiculous! Who cares about an MP3 player? I want something new! I want them to think differently!
Why oh why would they do this?! It's so wrong! It's so stupid!

Thumbs down what a load of tripe!
gee! an mp3 player with a HD! how original! kinda reminds me of a JUKEBOX i once knew..

Thumbs down No ****** Way
All that hype for an MP3 player? Break-thru digital device? The Reality Distiortion Field™ is starting to warp Steve's mind if he thinks for one second that this thing is gonna take off.

revolutionary?
There are already two products similar to this on the market. The Nomad Jukebox and the Archos Jukebox which can come with a 20 gig HD. The iPod is obviously alot cooler and has firewire, but it is far from revolutionary. I for one am disappointed and think that apple is making a mistake by trying to get into this market.

Thumbs down Goofy Idea!!!
OK. For $300 I can get an in-dash MP3 player for my car, which is where I spend most of my travel time. For walking, etc., a Rio is fine. At home, it's right off the MAc or my stereo. Where oh where does a $400 (!!!!!) player fit into the scheme of things? Seems like Steve just wanted the coolest toy, regardless of its practicality.

I said the Cube was overpriced and should cost $1200, this piece of Sh... should cost no more than $90.

Apple is selling a bunch of overpriced things like the TiBook that won't be resellable for more than $1300 in less than 6 month because it is not upgredable.

This iPod is for spoil rich kids with insane parents or an Apple fan as fannatic as a Taliban. It has good features but forget about getting it for $399!!!! Never, who gets that thing is a very stupid person.

... and it keeps going and going
 

Pootan

macrumors member
Oct 28, 2014
57
0
With the watch, people have spend the last couple of decades getting rid of them, and stopping wearing them, as they now carry the phone which makes the watch redundant for many.

Apple watch can be seen for a wrist watch as an IPhone is a iterative modernization of a pocket watch I think. As we get more advanced smart watches I think it can become more mainstream and even obsolete pocket phones.
 

Bengy66

macrumors regular
Nov 22, 2012
201
60
St. Louis, MO
What did Apple just order something like 30-50 MILLION chips for the watch? My guess they have an idea about what the demand will be.

I'll probably buy 2 honestly and use them as my notification/fitness center while the 6 plus will be for web/media consumption.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.