There is nothing left in the C2D, its been maxed at 3.06ghz for the last 2 years. If they keep the 3.06, its going to be in the mid model with a C2Q or mobile i7 on the high end. More likely they will have a 2.93 C2D in the mid to save on not paying extra for an "extreme" version.
It would suck if they use the i5. Its quick, its too much of a compromise to be worth buying.
Nope, you're wrong there. Benchmarks show that there is very little difference between i5 and i7 with the same clock speeds. The only real difference is that i7 has HT enabled, so it is a little faster but only in some applications and only a little. Celerons had a lot less cache than Pentiums. i5 and i7 have the same amount of cache. i7 has ht, i5 hasn't. i7 needs more power. That's it. If you've got good multithreaded apps than i7 will be few % faster, but not much. It will also be hotter. Some Xeons and the new i7 are also Lynnfield core.
Celerons were meant for the budget segment. i5's are mainstream/performance segment. The upcoming i3 will be budget.
I doubt they will go with i5's so soon. More likely fast C2D, maybe a C2 Quad at a reasonable clock speed.
I'm happy if I get the following specifications for $1499:
24"
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.93 or 3.06 GHz
4GB memory
640GB hard drive
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130
That would anyway be a huge leap from my current computer, which is an ASUS notebook from 2006 with Core Duo 1.83Ghz.
That'll be available in refurb store for about that price when new ones come
it's $1549 in the refurb store right now. I'd get it.
though it would be nice, i would expect a GT120 at that price point knowing Apple.I'm happy if I get the following specifications for $1499:
24"
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.93 or 3.06 GHz
4GB memory
640GB hard drive
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130
That would anyway be a huge leap from my current computer, which is an ASUS notebook from 2006 with Core Duo 1.83Ghz.