Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

nukiduz

macrumors 6502
Apr 23, 2006
397
0
That is the most likely situation. An i7 processor would give us the awful Intel GMA graphics.
 

Jobsian

macrumors 6502a
Jul 30, 2009
853
98
For about 6 to 7 months, than C2D is dead. Than what...?
Exactly, while it may be likely, it's not a certainty that a C2D is going to be used, unless Apple just don't mind releasing an update that will last 6 months.

But that puts further doubt, why did they not update it with the MBPs? It could well be supply issues or not wishing to detract (in the general public's perception) from the newly released ipad.

And don't forget that the MBA may not necessarily follow suit with MBP+MB, it's pitched as a premium notebook and may well be blazing another trail (as it has done before).

I just hope that this Macbook update is the explanation for the product code on the Aus shipment recently reported. I want to see the MBA refreshed at WWDC.
 

Huubster

macrumors regular
Mar 1, 2010
121
17
Exactly, while it may be likely, it's not a certainty that a C2D is going to be used, unless Apple just don't mind releasing an update that will last 6 months.

Apple could just as well create a stock of C2D which lasts a year or longer.
Creating stock in Taiwan or so isn't necessarily expensive...
 

kxfrog

macrumors regular
Aug 9, 2009
175
3
UK
What it means, is that if this MacBook leak is true then that is going to be the next spec of the leaked MacBook. It's a MacBook not a MacBook air and therefore we don't know what the next one is going to have
 

zedsdead

macrumors 68040
Jun 20, 2007
3,438
1,252
I'm guessing that the Macbook Air will get the NVIDIA 320 and retain the Core2Duo chips. Minor bump with a price drop maybe. No case redesign.
 

Scottsdale

Suspended
Sep 19, 2008
4,473
283
U.S.A.
Exactly, while it may be likely, it's not a certainty that a C2D is going to be used, unless Apple just don't mind releasing an update that will last 6 months.

But that puts further doubt, why did they not update it with the MBPs? It could well be supply issues or not wishing to detract (in the general public's perception) from the newly released ipad.

And don't forget that the MBA may not necessarily follow suit with MBP+MB, it's pitched as a premium notebook and may well be blazing another trail (as it has done before).

I just hope that this Macbook update is the explanation for the product code on the Aus shipment recently reported. I want to see the MBA refreshed at WWDC.

I don't think the new WhiteBook is the same product number that was reported last week, as I read (somewhere) that the numbers of the WhiteBook didn't match with the reported MBA number.
 

norsemen

macrumors regular
Apr 2, 2007
173
78
Scottsdale is correct. According to the administator at Macworld.com.au who broke the MBA-story, the numbers are different:

I was checking the story out last night. From the google translation of the Vietnamese page, it looks like the MacBook model number is MC518. Our rumoured MacBook Air number was MC516. Not sure what to make of that. They could actually be the same product, or we could be seeing both the MacBooks and MacBook Airs being updated this week.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.