Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Sensamic

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Mar 26, 2010
3,072
689
Free is possible. I'm looking for something like MxPlayer on Android, which allows to fast forward and rewind with gestures, and also turn up the brightness and volume.

Thanks.
 

off_piste

macrumors 6502a
Oct 25, 2015
762
479
I use the free version of Infuse. I like that I can wirelessly download movies from my network to my iPhone without getting near iTunes. It also has the gestures you're looking for.
 

fjarl

macrumors member
Sep 13, 2015
84
94
nPlayer is a really good alternative. Has tons of functionality and great playback. It also costs money, as will any player that can decode DTS and other formats that requires licences to implement.
 

MelodyYa

Suspended
Apr 28, 2016
9
0
This is probably an unexpected reply, but I use RManager(It's free!)
It has great smooth playback, and best of all, you get free Dolby DTS decoding. It works great with my x265 HEVC videos too, plus SMB support for my router.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/remote-media-manager-free/id981869721

Infuse is fantastic too. :)

I checked your app details in Store. It gets well designed. But it only gets one review. I suppose you need to boost it with many organic installs and positive reviews, besides posting here. It will rank your app top and will drive more new users to your app.

Wish you luck!
 

ashindnile

macrumors 6502
Jul 16, 2015
385
156
I checked your app details in Store. It gets well designed. But it only gets one review. I suppose you need to boost it with many organic installs and positive reviews, besides posting here. It will rank your app top and will drive more new users to your app.

Wish you luck!
Haha I wasn't advertising. It's not my app! :D
 

Sajal

macrumors regular
Mar 27, 2014
226
87
nPlayer (my choice)
infuse pro

These two are constantly upgraded and have been pretty consistent over the years. If you really want to stay on iOS, forget about the hefty price. Any of these two are worth the price. Both have free versions, so you can always try before you decide.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MelodyYa

pacorob

macrumors 68020
Apr 8, 2010
2,119
507
the Netherlands
nPlayer (my choice)
infuse pro

These two are constantly upgraded and have been pretty consistent over the years. If you really want to stay on iOS, forget about the hefty price. Any of these two are worth the price. Both have free versions, so you can always try before you decide.

I agree Infuse and nPlayer are great options but costs you some money but have many codecs they support and also include Chromecast support. nPlayer is also great with audio files. Infuse has better metadata support.

Another great free option was VidOn but I haven't been using it since a while so I don't know if it still works as it should. That app is limited in features and supported codecs though.
 
Last edited:

yegon

Cancelled
Oct 20, 2007
3,429
2,028
Infuse is my default, although I'm back to AVPlayerHD for now as it has PiP and Split Screen support for MP4/MKV, and Split Screen for avi.
 

IvanX

macrumors 6502
Mar 10, 2012
339
104
MoliPlayer is pretty good and so is AVPlayerHD. For a free app, MoliPlayer is surprisingly powerful and has in-app purchases to unlock additional functionality.
 

anwedr

macrumors member
Mar 20, 2016
42
15
I use animuplyr simply because it renders subtitles the way it should be as on a desktop/laptop. Though it doesn't get updated and not as neat as infuse player.
 

Perene

macrumors 6502a
Jun 29, 2015
835
321
Netherealm
nPlayer's last update (I am using the paid version):

TFzebnW.jpg
 

Perene

macrumors 6502a
Jun 29, 2015
835
321
Netherealm
I have both nPlayer and Infuse now.
So do I NOW. I made a suggestion here:
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/infuse-for-apple-tv-released.1942307/page-33#post-23724538

And besides that, I think the only bad thing about Infuse is the inability to play audio files. It can't recognize MP3 or FLAC, while nPlayer can...

For Apple-TV, I would recommend using VLC (free) and Infuse (paid), which is better than VLC, except for the fact that does not store files locally, which VLC can.
 

WeatherMate

macrumors member
Mar 17, 2015
73
4
san francisco, california
I always use VLC player in my phone. First, it is a free app and second it provides security for the videos. We can use pass-code to lock the videos in VLC app and protect the videos from others. And VLC can download and play the apps directly from the Dropbox.
 

fjarl

macrumors member
Sep 13, 2015
84
94
Can apps be free and still decode AC3? I thought app developers had to pay a licensing fee for that functionality?
 

pacorob

macrumors 68020
Apr 8, 2010
2,119
507
the Netherlands
I would like to share my own experience as i have tried a great many media player apps including infuse, mx player, vlc, oplayer on iOS and wasn't satisfied as i faced a lot of issues with every single one of them. That's when i found the PlayerXtreme media player app and I haven't faced an issue since. Its the best media player for iOS as its totally free and supports all formats so i don't have to convert any files. Plus it also has a lot of cool features which make the overall experience even more enjoyable. PlayerXtreme is also available on Android devices and Apple TV.

I never heard of that PlayerXtreme app. It looks nice and feature wise it has a lot to offer as well. What features are for the Pro users (4.99 dollar once)? It does seem to lack a few feature (e.g. opensubtitles.org support which Infuse has or AC3 support) that e.g. nPlayer and Infuse offer but they are also more expensive and depending on the usage it might be great for some.

Can apps be free and still decode AC3? I thought app developers had to pay a licensing fee for that functionality?

Normally AC3 is only offered in paid apps due to the fact of the licensing fees indeed.
Paid apps such as Infuse and nPlayer offer this.
 

IvanX

macrumors 6502
Mar 10, 2012
339
104
Can apps be free and still decode AC3? I thought app developers had to pay a licensing fee for that functionality?
They can be, in theory, but I doubt that devs would want to fork out those fees out of their own pockets without passing them on to customers.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.