Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

definitive

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Aug 4, 2008
2,089
1,021
I don't know, but to me it would make more sense to spend money on an iMac (when doing stuff other than surfing on the web) than it would on a Mac Mini + 24" Cinema display.

The specs seem to be weaker than the iMac too. I remember using the previous Mac Mini with maxed out RAM with Adobe CS4 Photoshop + Illustrator, and the cursor would constantly keep spinning from lag.
 
I find the new mini very capable with ram maxed. I don't have issues w/ photoshop or illustrator. But I think it would be foolish to me to say that this was a professional level computer. If that's what you need then the Mac Pro is the only option.
 
I find the new mini very capable with ram maxed. I don't have issues w/ photoshop or illustrator. But I think it would be foolish to me to say that this was a professional level computer. If that's what you need then the Mac Pro is the only option.

why would it be an only option? why wouldn't a 3ghz imac be capable of doing graphic design work?
 
It think it's fair to say the the iMac is intended for the home user and the Mac Pro (hence the name) is designated for professional use.

I'm not saying the high end iMac isn't capable of doing graphics type work. Especially maybe for a small business. But that was not it's intended use.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.