Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

hajime

macrumors 604
Original poster
Jul 23, 2007
7,922
1,311
Hi, I have an external Samsung SSD connected to a Mac which also acts like a SMB file server and a backup NAS. It is for backup of files from the Mac (perhaps using Time Machine or drag and drop), iPad, iPhone and files created under Windows but transferred to the Mac via SMB. In this case, which specific file format and method should I use when I initially format the drive under Disk Utilities?
 

hajime

macrumors 604
Original poster
Jul 23, 2007
7,922
1,311
Thanks.

For APFS, it is better to just use APFS or APFS (Case-sensitive)? Some of my files in Mac and Windows have both capital and small letters.

What is the recommended Scheme to use?

If I connect the drive directly to a M1 iPad Pro 12.9" or iPhone, will APFS be fine as well?
 

StellarVixen

macrumors 68040
Mar 1, 2018
3,254
5,779
Somewhere between 0 and 1
Of course, if you have files with same names in the same directory that use lowercase/uppercase (for example file.txt and FILE.txt), use case sensitive option.


Otherwise, case insensitive option should do just fine.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hajime

HDFan

Contributor
Jun 30, 2007
7,290
3,342
It is generally easier to use case insensitive so that searches don't fail if you don't have the correct capitalization, unless as above you have filenames that are the same other than case.

As above you don't want to use APFS if you are going to access it from Windows unless you want to install extra drivers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hajime

hajime

macrumors 604
Original poster
Jul 23, 2007
7,922
1,311
It is generally easier to use case insensitive so that searches don't fail if you don't have the correct capitalization, unless as above you have filenames that are the same other than case.

Good point. Just the "APFS" then. What Scheme should I use then?

As above you don't want to use APFS if you are going to access it from Windows unless you want to install extra drivers.

Some mentioned that exFAT is unstable. That is a problem.
 

theluggage

macrumors G3
Jul 29, 2011
8,015
8,449
Some mentioned that exFAT is unstable. That is a problem.
If - as you say - the Windows machines are connecting over the network via SMB then the format doesn't matter and you should use APFS because that's going to play best with files from the Mac.

Only if you want the disks to be readable when plugged directly into a Windows machine, would you need to use exFAT (or FAT32). ExFAT is handy for USB sticks etc. that you're going to move between machines.

In an emergency, if you ever need to read the disk from Windows you can even buy software from Paragon (and others) that lets you read APFS disks on Windows - but I wouldn't normally bother.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brian33 and hajime

hajime

macrumors 604
Original poster
Jul 23, 2007
7,922
1,311
It is generally easier to use case insensitive so that searches don't fail if you don't have the correct capitalization, unless as above you have filenames that are the same other than case.

As above you don't want to use APFS if you are going to access it from Windows unless you want to install extra drivers.
Thanks for the tips.
 

hajime

macrumors 604
Original poster
Jul 23, 2007
7,922
1,311
If - as you say - the Windows machines are connecting over the network via SMB then the format doesn't matter and you should use APFS because that's going to play best with files from the Mac.

Only if you want the disks to be readable when plugged directly into a Windows machine, would you need to use exFAT (or FAT32). ExFAT is handy for USB sticks etc. that you're going to move between machines.

In an emergency, if you ever need to read the disk from Windows you can even buy software from Paragon (and others) that lets you read APFS disks on Windows - but I wouldn't normally bother.

Good idea. Thank you.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.