Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

generik

macrumors 601
Original poster
Aug 5, 2005
4,116
1
Minitrue
I just found this little image from another PC mainboard manufacturer:
Picture

The picture was originally referenced here.

Since I am a Mac user, naturally I believes everything span out by marketing, and likewise now I am all into these new big beefy looking capacitors even though I have no idea what they do! Has anyone actually had the experience of opening their Macs? Does Apple use the big one or the puny cheap ones?
 

mattjgalloway

macrumors member
May 21, 2006
95
0
Why does it matter?!

You generally don't get a PC dying because of it's capacitors dying. I've had a couple of leaky ones after many MANY years of use, but nothing too bad.

A capacitor is a capacitor.
 

mattjgalloway

macrumors member
May 21, 2006
95
0
HAHAHA! Seriously generik, you are joking right?!

A flux capacitor is what they used in Back to the Future and Busted's "Year 3000" song for time-travel!

"... Stood there, was my neighbour, called Peter and a flux capacitor ..." ... "... Oh I went to the Year 3000. Not much has changed but they live underwater. And your great great great granddaughter, is pretty fine. [is preeeety fiiine] ..."
 

GimmeSlack12

macrumors 603
Apr 29, 2005
5,406
13
San Francisco
I hear Apple employs children from India to make cheap capacitors that only have a charge of 0.05 mH (micro Henry's).

I say "Why not exploit 3rd world nations!" we are talking about CAPACITORS people!
 

mattjgalloway

macrumors member
May 21, 2006
95
0
GimmeSlack12 said:
I hear Apple employs children from India to make cheap capacitors that only have a charge of 0.05 mH (micro Henry's).

You're joking too right?? 0.05 mH is milli Henrys, micro Henrys (no apostrophe aswell!) is uH (well, a mew symbol, but u will do)

And Henrys is NOT a measure of the charge stored! It kind of is, but it depends on the voltage across it as to how many coulombs of charge are stored on it!

Anyway, it's moot because the size of the cap is chosen, it's not like the size is dependant on how well they are made!!!
 

mkrishnan

Moderator emeritus
Jan 9, 2004
29,776
15
Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Mitthrawnuruodo said:
Yes, once I get it up to 88 mph...

Do not, I repeat, do NOT let the Lithuanians steal back the bomb parts!!!! :D

For what it's worth, weren't electrolytic capacitors implicated in the rash of failures on Rev. A iMac G5s? There are definitely electrolytic capacitors in Macs... Linkety.
 

gnasher729

Suspended
Nov 25, 2005
17,980
5,566
generik said:
Since I am a Mac user, naturally I believes everything span out by marketing, and likewise now I am all into these new big beefy looking capacitors even though I have no idea what they do! Has anyone actually had the experience of opening their Macs? Does Apple use the big one or the puny cheap ones?

Are you seriously trying to tell us that you don't know the story behind bad capacitors and you are not trolling?
 

Chaszmyr

macrumors 601
Aug 9, 2002
4,267
86
gnasher729 said:
Are you seriously trying to tell us that you don't know the story behind bad capacitors and you are not trolling?

People with almost 2500 posts don't usually troll. That said, this is kind if a silly thread, but I am reasonably sure that modern Macs use solid capacitors.
 

generik

macrumors 601
Original poster
Aug 5, 2005
4,116
1
Minitrue
mattjgalloway said:
HAHAHA! Seriously generik, you are joking right?!

A flux capacitor is what they used in Back to the Future and Busted's "Year 3000" song for time-travel!

"... Stood there, was my neighbour, called Peter and a flux capacitor ..." ... "... Oh I went to the Year 3000. Not much has changed but they live underwater. And your great great great granddaughter, is pretty fine. [is preeeety fiiine] ..."

Dang, I didn't have the slightest clue :eek:
 

generik

macrumors 601
Original poster
Aug 5, 2005
4,116
1
Minitrue
gnasher729 said:
Are you seriously trying to tell us that you don't know the story behind bad capacitors and you are not trolling?

Well, IANAEE (I Am Not An Electrical Engineer) so quite honestly I don't really know what difference it makes. But I certainly do know that cheap resistors = *poof*, and back in the day when I used to frequent 2CPU.com, a mainboard manufacturers (iWill) will always use the fact that their boards have some kind of digital voltage regulator and have no capacitors, while the competiting board at that time (Tyan K8WE) has rows after rows of caps.

Heck, I still own a system with a K8WE in it, still works as it should, but in some sense iWill's marketing has gotten to me :rolleyes:

Anyhow I spent some time looking at MBP "pr0n" shots and it seems like on its logicboard there don't seem to be any capacitors, does that mean Apple uses the newer digital regulators as well?
 

mduser63

macrumors 68040
Nov 9, 2004
3,042
31
Salt Lake City, UT
I am a 4th year EE student (and work as one), and I think that's just marketing hype on the part of GIGABYTE. Things can't be simplified so much. Electrolytic capacitors are in use in just about every electronic device, and with a proper design and good quality suppliers (ie. non-defective parts) they'll last for a long long time. Capacitors are used for many many different things in a typical circuit from reducing noise on a power supply line, to creating an oscillator, to being used as a temporary RAM backup for battery swaps in a laptop.

There are MANY other types of capacitors besides electrolytic and "solid" (which is just a type of electrolytic actually). It's just that non-electrolytic caps are typically not very large and don't stand out on a circuit board, so no one notices/thinks about them.

All in all, electrolytic vs. solid isn't going to make a big difference.
 

mattjgalloway

macrumors member
May 21, 2006
95
0
Well put. I too am a 4th year EE student and so I was finding it quite hard to beleive what was being said here about capacitors.

Are they really used as RAM backup when battery swapped out? I've never seen that before! I find it strange to beleive a cap can hold enough charge for enough time to allow a stick of RAM to hold its data... you got a link?
 

emotion

macrumors 68040
Mar 29, 2004
3,186
3
Manchester, UK
There was a mass recall of Dell Optiplex machines recently due to capacitors burting and causing disk failures.

I know because I had a disk failure in my Dell (all my dell hardware is bought by my employer...not me!) and they nearly blamed that.
 

atszyman

macrumors 68020
Sep 16, 2003
2,437
16
The Dallas 'burbs
generik said:
I just found this little image from another PC mainboard manufacturer:
Picture

The picture was originally referenced here.

Since I am a Mac user, naturally I believes everything span out by marketing, and likewise now I am all into these new big beefy looking capacitors even though I have no idea what they do! Has anyone actually had the experience of opening their Macs? Does Apple use the big one or the puny cheap ones?

Apple like most PCs probably use almost every type and value of cap on their motherboards. The reason for the vast majority of the capacitors is to smooth the power supply which can be affected by any oscillating signal on the board (read:clocks). Since computers have the processor clock, FSB clock, FSB data signals, PCI(X)(Express), Firewire, etc. all running at any given time there is a wide range of frequencies bouncing around all the time on the MB. The type and size of the capacitors that are used determines which frequencies it filters and how well it filters them. With large enough capacitors you could easily hold ram contents while swapping batteries but that's limited to only a few seconds that they need to hold a charge.

It is extremely rare for a capacitor to fail by exploding unless it is an electrolytic capacitor installed backwards. Most other failures are going to be due to cracks and age which will probably never be noticed since most are chosen to handle worst case conditions which rarely occur.
 

mmmcheese

macrumors 6502a
Feb 17, 2006
948
0
mduser63 said:
I am a 4th year EE student (and work as one), and I think that's just marketing hype on the part of GIGABYTE. Things can't be simplified so much. Electrolytic capacitors are in use in just about every electronic device, and with a proper design and good quality suppliers (ie. non-defective parts) they'll last for a long long time. Capacitors are used for many many different things in a typical circuit from reducing noise on a power supply line, to creating an oscillator, to being used as a temporary RAM backup for battery swaps in a laptop.

There are MANY other types of capacitors besides electrolytic and "solid" (which is just a type of electrolytic actually). It's just that non-electrolytic caps are typically not very large and don't stand out on a circuit board, so no one notices/thinks about them.

All in all, electrolytic vs. solid isn't going to make a big difference.

I think they are just taking advantage of the fear people have of getting a board with bad capacitors on them because of the bad batches that were out there a few years back. Since all of them blew out the top, I guess they figure buy showing ones that don't have soft tops, that people will somehow think these are better (which they may or may not be for this application).
 

GimmeSlack12

macrumors 603
Apr 29, 2005
5,406
13
San Francisco
mattjgalloway said:
You're joking too right?? 0.05 mH is milli Henrys, micro Henrys (no apostrophe aswell!) is uH (well, a mew symbol, but u will do)

And Henrys is NOT a measure of the charge stored! It kind of is, but it depends on the voltage across it as to how many coulombs of charge are stored on it!

Anyway, it's moot because the size of the cap is chosen, it's not like the size is dependant on how well they are made!!!
You're right, milli-Henry's.
You're right, I'm joking (making fun of this thread).
 

generik

macrumors 601
Original poster
Aug 5, 2005
4,116
1
Minitrue
mmmcheese said:
I think they are just taking advantage of the fear people have of getting a board with bad capacitors on them because of the bad batches that were out there a few years back. Since all of them blew out the top, I guess they figure buy showing ones that don't have soft tops, that people will somehow think these are better (which they may or may not be for this application).

So... basically what Gigabyte said is bullsh1t? That those big capacitors are no better than the smaller ones?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.