Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

sparkie7

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Oct 17, 2008
2,430
202
I'm using APFS (Encrypted) , GUID partition map. (via Disk Utility)

Is this the best option? As I want to protect/encrypt the partitions/data in case it gets stolen. Are there any drawbacks, time to de-crypt partition perhaps?

Are there other options I haven't considered?
 

chabig

macrumors G4
Sep 6, 2002
11,460
9,326
You're wasting your time for three reasons:

1) You already said the disk is encrypted.
2) Don't partition APFS drives. Partitioning has been deprecated for all but a few needs. Adding volumes is how you logically separate data on APFS drives.
3) See reason #1.

Bottom line, your data is already safe. Nothing more needs to be done.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: sparkie7

sparkie7

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Oct 17, 2008
2,430
202
You're wasting your time for three reasons:

1) You already said the disk is encrypted.
2) Don't partition APFS drives. Partitioning has been deprecated for all but a few needs. Adding volumes is how you logically separate data on APFS drives.
3) See reason #1.

Bottom line, your data is already safe. Nothing more needs to be done.

Can you change volume sizes on the fly?
 

DeltaMac

macrumors G5
Jul 30, 2003
13,763
4,589
Delaware
An added volume on an APFS drive shares space with other added volumes on the same container, and each volume does, in fact, operate/act like separate drives. (And, they share space among the volumes in the same container, so there's probably not a circumstance that you would need to "change sizes on the fly", unless you have gone very wrong in your space needs in the first place
I have a drive here, (which is an SSD) one that I use a lot -- with 8 "normal" bootable partitions (each are Mac OS Extended (journaled), all OS X systems from 10.5 to 10.12, each system is a minimal installed system on 32GB partitions.
That takes 256GB of that 512 GB drive, each separate, and bootable systems.
The other 256GB of the device (which is an SSD) is a single container, with 8 more volumes, all sharing the same space in the container. Each is another bootable system from 10.13 to 12.3. Yes, that's only 5 systems, but after 10.15, macOS systems have more than one partition.
So, 13 bootable systems, all on the one drive.
A bit complex if you look at the partitions from the terminal, but no problem in actual use.
(I use it for boot testing, so I always know I have a system on that drive that will boot any Intel Mac, and I can move that drive to a Firewire enclosure to boot some older PPC Macs (I hate the firmware commands to do that from USB, and I know that I can boot from Firewire)
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.