Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Metzgermeister

macrumors member
Original poster
May 27, 2007
87
12
Have been waiting for nearly a year for this new model with a higher end CPU, and there it is! I already made up my mind, a 14" M1Pro with 1 TB. So far it was easy. But central memory...what to take? 16 or 32 Gb?

I know 32Gb would be the first choice, but it does cost €460 ($530) for a total of €3209 ($3725). Then I wonder if I really need 32Gb? No heavy apps are used, sometimes a bit of movie or photo editing, but nothing professional. For this a 16Gb would be sufficient. But on the other side my current 2015 MBP also has 16 GB, so after 6 years I would have the same memory as the last 6 years.

I'm confused, what to do? Pick the 16GB and safe some serious money. Or just go for the 32Gb, pay quickly and be well prepared for the future...
 

Christopher Kim

macrumors 6502a
Nov 18, 2016
768
741
I had the exact same conundrum, that kept me waffling back and forth on the Apple Store app... I was set on 14" M1 Pro (don't need GPU really) with 1TB SSD. I also had upgraded to the 16gb memory on my 2016 13" MBP.

It would've been a much easier choice if the upgrade price from 16g > 32gb memory wasn't so egregious ($400 here in the US, your E460 is even crazier...) I know it's not quite the same upgrade as we typically think of memory, given it's all onboard / unified memory now with Apple silicon architecture vs discrete memory sticks. Still, it seems like this is probably in the later innings where Apple can continue to get away with this memory upgrade pricing.

All that to be said, I just went with the 32gb upgrade. Peace of mind for a machine I'll keep at least 4-5 years. But I could easily have been convinced the other way...
 
  • Like
Reactions: badsimian

Variant

macrumors 6502
Oct 22, 2005
302
61
I am sorta in the same boat. Coming from a 2011 MacBook Air. Either is going to be a significant upgrade and I don't do anything intensive. That being said, based on my purchase history, will be keeping this thing 10+ years.
 

Dragonforce

macrumors 6502a
Apr 9, 2008
587
5
Germany
Got the 16“ base model, which comes with 512GB of storage and 16GB of RAM.
i don’t use any professional apps, I guess I’ll be fine. My current 13“ Touch Bar MBP 2019 only has 8GB…
 

Metzgermeister

macrumors member
Original poster
May 27, 2007
87
12
Well, in the end I ordered the 32GB version. Just to be on safe side for next years. The final decision was made based on use of VMware running Win10 and later Win11. I can give it easily 16GB to run properly without affecting the rest of the MBP.
I think I made the right choice (if I don’t look at the total price)
 

Rivanov

macrumors 6502
Dec 28, 2010
488
526
Netherlands
I'm debating between this as well.
Will primarily use the laptop for e-mail, webbrowsing and Football Manager.
But because the unified memory is different than the "normal" memory usage/allocation on previous laptop.. I don't know if the upgrade to 32GB is that significant? Or will 16GB also be enough on the long term.
 

jonnysods

macrumors G3
Sep 20, 2006
8,625
7,188
There & Back Again
I'm debating between this as well.
Will primarily use the laptop for e-mail, webbrowsing and Football Manager.
But because the unified memory is different than the "normal" memory usage/allocation on previous laptop.. I don't know if the upgrade to 32GB is that significant? Or will 16GB also be enough on the long term.
Honestly the 16gb would be fine. I have an M1 MBA and I have thrown some very intensive tasks at it and it has held up just fine, you will be thrilled.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tdbrown75

SimonQ

macrumors member
Oct 19, 2021
32
19
Well, in the end I ordered the 32GB version. Just to be on safe side for next years. The final decision was made based on use of VMware running Win10 and later Win11. I can give it easily 16GB to run properly without affecting the rest of the MBP.
I think I made the right choice (if I don’t look at the total price)
With these new chips being so good, I think the base M1 Pro will be good enough for years unless you are doing video rendering etc (which I am not). But I think the RAM slowish the machine down with heaps of apps open is the part that could throttle an otherwise amazing machine. An A$600 "just in case" insurance policy is hard to swallow but it would kill me to run out memory with heaps of apps open on a machine like this. Do I need to up the chip to 10 core if I am juts doing Office, browsing and maybe Logic Pro X? I am not sure I can justify the price of doing both...so which one? I think RAM.
 

gpat

macrumors 68000
Mar 1, 2011
1,932
5,345
Italy
Until last week, all of MacRumors was saying that 8GB was enough.
So you'll have to ask for an 8GB version of the new Pro.
Apple must have made a mistake somewhere.
 

DennisdeWit

macrumors 6502a
Nov 16, 2016
872
849
The Netherlands
I personally went for 16GB RAM. I am mostly using the MacBook Pro for surfing, writing articles and rarely Windows 11 in Parallels. But I more often use Remote Desktop and run things on my server at the datacenter :)

Moreover, I will use my MacBook Pro for 2-3 years and then it will be replaced. So if I would need more RAM, it will be probably so in a few years when I would buy a new MacBook Pro anyway. If I really run against limites regularly, we will see then. But on my M1 Mac Mini I have 16GB and never had any issues with RAM.
 

Koni17

macrumors member
Nov 2, 2016
86
463
Take the 32gb. Don’t forget memory is unified.

Considering that modern gpus of similar performance are running on 8-12gb+ of vram.

You may as well get the larger memory option
This.

I was completely on the fence as well, even cancelling my original order. In the end I went for 32GB, reason being that I currently use around 12GB with my existing MacBook Pro, coupled with the unified architecture and estimating what the GPU would be using for regular use, as well as a bit of headroom for the future as apps utilize more RAM, I at least have piece of mind now.
 

CooKieMoNs7eR

macrumors 68020
Nov 18, 2009
2,235
1,152
Went with the 16gb, first of all apple's ram upgrades are expensive, 2nd I just use my mac for surfing the web and watching youtube, checking email...I'll use this for 4-5 years then upgrade again.
 

Fishrrman

macrumors Penryn
Feb 20, 2009
29,256
13,339
16 is "the new 8".

I reckon 16gb will be fine for the base configuration, unless one intends to do HEAVY video editing (4k multiple streams or 8k).

I usually order "the base configuration" since my needs aren't too great. I've never had problems with them over the useful life of the Mac. My 2015 MBP is still running fine with 8gb of RAM...
 

j_in_tx

macrumors regular
Jun 28, 2018
114
73
Until last week, all of MacRumors was saying that 8GB was enough.
So you'll have to ask for an 8GB version of the new Pro.
Apple must have made a mistake somewhere.
I assume since more than 1 external monitor is supported, then more ram is needed on the minimum end.
 

fa8362

macrumors 68000
Jul 7, 2008
1,571
498
From what you wrote, you don't even use 16GB, so why would you get more? I wouldn't and didn't...and I have a 50mp camera.
 

Rck1984

macrumors 6502
Jun 5, 2017
398
1,167
The Netherlands
I personally went for 16GB RAM. I am mostly using the MacBook Pro for surfing, writing articles and rarely Windows 11 in Parallels. But I more often use Remote Desktop and run things on my server at the datacenter :)

Moreover, I will use my MacBook Pro for 2-3 years and then it will be replaced. So if I would need more RAM, it will be probably so in a few years when I would buy a new MacBook Pro anyway. If I really run against limites regularly, we will see then. But on my M1 Mac Mini I have 16GB and never had any issues with RAM.

Likewise, also working on RDS, Citrix and VDI environments ( I do need that 2 external monitor support though) so I don't need any crazy local resources. I don't believe in future proofing either, I rather get what I need right now or in the foreseeable future and save the cash for the next MacBook upgrade in 2-3 years. Its a huge waste of money to overspec and never fully utilise your MacBook.

16GB M1 Air here at the moment of writing, never been stressing my RAM hard enough to consider an upgrade. If the rare occasional swap does happen, the blazing fast SSD will do so unnoticed.

These enthousiast forums are great, but they're also the reason people are overspeccing their machines like crazy.
 

radgar

macrumors member
Aug 16, 2010
30
5
UK
Ordered a 14" M1Pro 10CPU/16GPU 1TB SSD with 16GB RAM yesterday for me. The only 'high power' things I do are Lightroom, Photoshop, and some models in R.

Also ordered a 16" M1Max 10CPU/24GPU 1TB SSD with 32GB RAM yesterday for my son (The Sims apparently is greedy for power).

Had a moment of buyer's remorse today and wondered about cancelling and ordering a 32GB RAM 14". The shift in the delivery dates persuaded me 16GB RAM would be enough for the next few years: October 26 delivery for my current order, November 26-29 for a revised order.

16GB RAM on a 2017 2.9GHz i7 is mostly OK. I'm expecting the 14" 16GB RAM to perform better despite the shared memory. And be a bit easier to carry around.

I'll be interested to see if there's any real difference between the 2 machines for our day to day things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crz10

DennisdeWit

macrumors 6502a
Nov 16, 2016
872
849
The Netherlands
Likewise, also working on RDS, Citrix and VDI environments ( I do need that 2 external monitor support though) so I don't need any crazy local resources. I don't believe in future proofing either, I rather get what I need right now or in the foreseeable future and save the cash for the next MacBook upgrade in 2-3 years. Its a huge waste of money to overspec and never fully utilise your MacBook.

16GB M1 Air here at the moment of writing, never been stressing my RAM hard enough to consider an upgrade. If the rare occasional swap does happen, the blazing fast SSD will do so unnoticed.

These enthousiast forums are great, but they're also the reason people are overspeccing their machines like crazy.
Thanks for being the voice of reason. I have never ever seen a warning that I was out of memory. I am mostly in Safari, Terminal and might compile an app maybe one or two times per month. Mostly I am writing articles in Word or Google Docs. And yes, I do use Media Encoder just to convert some 1080p video’s for my Visual Radio project.

I feel like my idea to go for 32GB is mostly based on FOMO and not common sense. I was perfectly fine with it, until I saw all these people going for 32GB.
 

drygioni

macrumors regular
Aug 27, 2017
180
127
I went for the base CPU, 32GB and 1TB. I'm expecting to have the laptop for about 6 years for mostly Logic, Lightroom and Premier very occasionally. I always try and over-spec RAM, even though it's painful, and I've been maxing 512GB for years. I'm hoping the 8 core will still be fast enough for my needs as it's the absolute maximum I could spend.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.