Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

stuff99

macrumors 6502
Original poster
May 11, 2007
394
0
Thinking of doing the bootcamp thing to play some pc games and I was wondering what virus scans do you use to 'protect' the pc side of your macs?
 

Moof1904

macrumors 65816
May 20, 2004
1,060
100
If you're using Parallels, it comes with free anti-virus software, Kaspersky anti-virus, I think it is.
 

yippy

macrumors 68020
Mar 14, 2004
2,087
3
Chicago, IL
McAfee Enterprise edition. Not only is it under site license from my school, I also find it to be MUCH less invasive and doesn't slow down the system like Norton.
 

iMouse

macrumors 6502
Jul 23, 2002
255
19
Boardman, Ohio
McAfee VirusScan Enterprise 8.5i.

LOVE IT

The system runs smooth with it loaded, it isn't invasive at all, checks for Spyware and Malware as well as Potentially Unwanted Programs that are typically the meat and potatoes of most infected PCs nowadays.

The free Ewido scan along with VirusScan Enterprise seems to keep a PC pretty clean even in the most malware infested porn sites. :)

http://www.ewido.net
 

yg17

macrumors Pentium
Aug 1, 2004
15,028
3,003
St. Louis, MO
I use one called common sense ;)


I'm in my Windows VM so little that it's just a waste to have one. Besides, it's a virtual machine, so it can't affect my iMac at all, and if the installation got hosed, I'd just trash the VM and reinstall Windows. I don't have any important data or anything in there.
 

Nordichund

macrumors 6502
Aug 21, 2007
497
270
Oslo, Norway
One of the things I swore I would do when I changed my computer was to NEVER install Norton antivirus on it, even though my ISP provides it for free. It might be a good piece of software for keeping viruses away, however I believe it's like a virus itself once it gets on the pc, like windows always opening up boxes asking you to authorize stuff or warn you. I really, really hate it. I'm sure it slows down the PC as well.

Since I bought my Mac I use the simpler Norman antivirus in XP, since I get it free with my netbank (they must have faith in its security).

Since all my e-mails are written and opened in OS X and most of my surfing, the only chance I could catch a virus would be from surfing on sites that won't open in Mac or by online gaming, but I am glad I have something there just in case.

My ISP also provides free Norton for Mac :eek:
 

~Shard~

macrumors P6
Jun 4, 2003
18,377
48
1123.6536.5321
Another vote for GriSoft's AVG Free Edition - it works great and meets my needs for the limited use my Windows machine gets these days. ;) :cool:
 

byakuya

macrumors 6502a
Jul 26, 2007
542
0
ESET NOD32

http://www.eset.com/products/compare.php

Can't go wrong with NOD32. Small footprint on your resources, and can't go wrong with it's capabilities or reputation. You can even view the other links within the website on it's performance.

http://www.av-comparatives.org/

http://www.virusbtn.com/

http://www.eset.com/products/compare-NOD32-vs-competition.php


totally agree...I have used a load of scanners (when I was a PC owner) and I can safely say that nod32 is the best scanner out there.
 

MimicBunion972

macrumors member
Jun 25, 2007
84
39
I am using symantec antivirus enterprise edition under university licence. Runs perfectly, auto scran, auto update, never requires me to do anything. It makes vista as virus-free (seems to be) as Mac OS. I recommend it to anybody who can get a public licence. The enterprise edition is way better than the symantec persenal security suit.
 

Killyp

macrumors 68040
Jun 14, 2006
3,859
7
I am using symantec antivirus enterprise edition under university licence. Runs perfectly, auto scran, auto update, never requires me to do anything. It makes vista as virus-free (seems to be) as Mac OS. I recommend it to anybody who can get a public licence. The enterprise edition is way better than the symantec persenal security suit.

Not quite, you can still get viruses with an antivirus package installed. It's just far less likely, as happened to me...

AVG is better, has more regular definitions updates and uses less resources (norton is an absolute hog).
 

tommyz23

macrumors newbie
Nov 3, 2007
13
0
Avg

I have been using AVG for a long time with my PCs. I have yet to find out if it works, since I have never come across a virus.

The most important thing is don't d/l something your are not sure of the source and this goes for the mac also.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.