Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

johnalan

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jul 15, 2009
868
1,023
Dublin, Ireland
hey, most reviewers seem to be focused on the M4 Pro this year, it looks great.

Also seems the Mini is a smash hit. What's the consensus on the M4 Max, is it a winner?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Basic75

UnifiedMelody

macrumors 6502
Nov 17, 2017
358
185
Australia
hey, most reviewers seem to be focused on the M4 Pro this year, it looks great.

Also seems the Mini is a smash hit. What's the consensus on the M4 Max, is it a winner?
Wait for Max Tech, that's what I'm doing before I commit to M4 Pro [48/1TB] unbinned or M4 Max [64GB/1TB unbinned]... -16 inch also. Max Tech hoping he gets his video out soon because i want to see how their verdict is on 14" vs 16" for M4 Max, given a lot of the marketing on the mid-range product, I now want to see the M4 Max performance dearly.
 
Last edited:

daleski75

macrumors 68000
Dec 10, 2008
1,992
473
Northampton, UK
My last Mac was the first M1 MacBook Pro so my new one (see signature) is a massive upgrade, absolutely overkill for what I need but whenever I get a Mac I normally compromise and don't keep it for long due to this (memory is a major factor)

Was very close to getting the 16" MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48/1Tb though which I think is the sweet spot.
 

MuTron

macrumors newbie
Jul 5, 2019
12
16
Wait for Max Tech, that's what I'm doing before I commit to M4 Pro [48/1TB] unbinned or M4 Max [64GB/1TB unbinned]... -16 inch also. Max Tech hoping he gets his video out soon because i want to see how their verdict is on 14" vs 16" for M4 Max, given a lot of the marketing on the mid-range product, I now want to see the M4 Max performance dearly.
Proper performance benchmarks are already out there and exactly as you’d expect per core count and device size:

CPU performance is identical to the relevant Pro (because they’re the same in terms of CPU) and GPU scales basically linearly with core count so the 40 core Max has pretty much double the performance of the 20 core Pro for GPU intensive tasks


The reason the Pro is getting all of the reviews is because it’s the biggest improvement over the hobbled M3 Pro
 

MrGimper

macrumors G3
Sep 22, 2012
8,998
12,900
Andover, UK
Proper performance benchmarks are already out there and exactly as you’d expect per core count and device size:

CPU performance is identical to the relevant Pro (because they’re the same in terms of CPU) and GPU scales basically linearly with core count so the 40 core Max has pretty much double the performance of the 20 core Pro for GPU intensive tasks


The reason the Pro is getting all of the reviews is because it’s the biggest improvement over the hobbled M3 Pro
Yes it certainly seems that the M3 Pro was more towards the M3 than it was the Max.

I have an M3 Max 16/40 and I'm pleased to see from the reviews that the M4 Max isn't light years ahead. Seems most stuff is just down to faster clocks, and fan noise to deal with the extra heat.

I picked up my machine in May from Apple Refurb and saved £800 so cool beans.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.