Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

scaz182

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Mar 11, 2009
20
0
Hi all,

I'm interested in the 'Windows Experience Index' on your Macs in either Vista or Windows7?

I'd especially be interested in the index results for a Macbook Pro 13" 2.53GHz as I have just ordered one!?

Cheers.
 

Stridder44

macrumors 68040
Mar 24, 2003
3,973
198
California
Bear in mind the WEI is very general method of evaluating one's machine, and it not an accurate indicator of a machine's true power. It can't replace a proper benchmarking app (even then, real benchmarking apps don't compare to real-world scores).

My point is take whatever score it gives you with a grain of salt.
 

VenusianSky

macrumors 65816
Aug 28, 2008
1,290
47
Bear in mind the WEI is very general method of evaluating one's machine, and it not an accurate indicator of a machine's true power. It can't replace a proper benchmarking app (even then, real benchmarking apps don't compare to real-world scores).

My point is take whatever score it gives you with a grain of salt.

The only thing I found that uses this are games. The purpose is to give an average user (non-hardcore gamer) some idea of how well it should run. Games that support WEI have a minumum and recommended rating. You can view it by opening the games folder, selecting a game and on the right pane select the performance tab. I think of it as the minimum/recommended requirements that is printed on the box except without the technical jargon. I imagine some games probably have the WEI printed on the box as well.
 

scaz182

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Mar 11, 2009
20
0
Yeah, I'm aware it's ultimately a dumbing down of system requirements for your average consumer but the breakdown of results do give a basic indication of your computers performance, I was really just interested as to how a Macbook would handle Windows Aero in comparison to my current laptop.
 

MaxBuck

macrumors newbie
Oct 25, 2009
13
0
Ohio
Yeah, I'm aware it's ultimately a dumbing down of system requirements for your average consumer but the breakdown of results do give a basic indication of your computers performance, I was really just interested as to how a Macbook would handle Windows Aero in comparison to my current laptop.
My MBP 15" has a Windows Experience of 5.5 running in Boot Camp. I have the dual graphics processors - 9400 and 9600GT. Aero will not function running in Parallels.
 

bcburrows

macrumors 6502
Mar 25, 2009
427
7
Bristol
My MBP 15" has a Windows Experience of 5.5 running in Boot Camp. I have the dual graphics processors - 9400 and 9600GT. Aero will not function running in Parallels.

My 2.66 mbp only has a score of 5.2 - it says graphics card 9600 scores 5.1 and hence brings it down. u installed newer nvidia drivers?
 

peskaa

macrumors 68020
Mar 13, 2008
2,104
5
London, UK
My Late 2008 MBP scores a 5.3, lowered by the 9600GT 512MB. The next lowest is the CPU at 5.9 and HDD at the same (7,200rpm).
 

mpuck972

macrumors 6502
Aug 31, 2007
400
0
My 27" iMac scores a 6.1 because the hard drive information exchange is 6.1 other wise it would be a 6.6
 

Stridder44

macrumors 68040
Mar 24, 2003
3,973
198
California
Yeah, I'm aware it's ultimately a dumbing down of system requirements for your average consumer but the breakdown of results do give a basic indication of your computers performance, I was really just interested as to how a Macbook would handle Windows Aero in comparison to my current laptop.

My MBP is about 6.1 all around (except in the HDD department, which brings everything down to a lousy 5.1). This is with 4GB RAM and a 8600M GT 512MB.
 

Terminal.app

macrumors 6502
Sep 29, 2009
266
0

bcburrows

macrumors 6502
Mar 25, 2009
427
7
Bristol
With the new graphics driver and a seagate 7200 hdd my score has 'jumped' to 5.9 - with the lowest component being the HDD

Certainly not getting an SSD to boost my score but break my bank
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.