Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

HDFan

Contributor
Original poster
Jun 30, 2007
7,297
3,343
Backblaze in 2013 reported that disks fail in a "bathtub" fashion. High early failures from infant mortality (0-18 months), decreased failure rates after the infant mortalities (18 months to 3 years), and rising failure rates as disks aged (3-4 years).

Screen Shot 2021-10-26 at 6.29.53 PM.png

With more disks in their arrays, more data, and improving disk quality the infant rate has dropped and the rising rates have been pushed out. Life expectancy was 50% at 6 years, now it is 88%.

 
  • Like
Reactions: poorcody

KeesMacPro

macrumors 65816
Nov 7, 2019
1,453
596
Interesting article!
TBH i would have liked to see a clear differentiation between SSDs and HDDs i.e. 2 different tests.
Fact is they dont behave/wear out the same way.
 
Last edited:

HDFan

Contributor
Original poster
Jun 30, 2007
7,297
3,343
TBH i would have liked to see a clear differentiation between SSDs and HDDs i.e. 2 different tests.
Fact is they dont behave/wear out the same way.

Yes. So far Backblaze is seeing almost similar failure rates, when adjusted for age. They have just started using more SSD's for boot disks as their prices have dropped. But it will be 3 years or so until they can compare the 6+ year failure rate of SSDs and hard disks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeesMacPro

400

macrumors 6502a
Sep 12, 2015
760
319
Wales
Interesting stuff. I like back blaze reports, make for interesting reading especially the reliability stuff.

I have a mix of ages and hopefully not all at the same time will they decide to up heads and depart this mortal coil.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.