It hasn't.
The financial analysts are fretting because they fear Apple is close to having saturated their available markets.
What they want and hope is for Apple to create new products in other categories that have little or no current markets. Otherwise, sure, there are limits to their growth.
There is no way anybody can conclude that Apple (or the other two companies currently jockeying for World's Most Valuable Publicly Traded Company - Microsoft and Amazon) is in a "decline". It's just plain madness to think that.
[doublepost=1543975358][/doublepost]
That makes no sense. The "up to" is a plus, not a minus. It provides a performance path for those that need it.
The "common man" or average small business has no need for the power of an iMac Pro. But for those that do, it's actually attractively priced. I think a low-end iMac Pro is a much better value proposition than a high-end 2018 Mac Mini, for example. (Even though there is a price gap between the two - which gives you one of the best displays available at a pittance.)
I predict the redesigned 2019 Mac Pro will range in price "up to" $100,000. That's a plus. That WILL open new markets for Apple. It will give them a bigger share of high-end video production, and it may give them a shot at engineering workstations. (Most of the software today for that market only runs on Windows.)
[doublepost=1543975681][/doublepost]
On the iOS devices, it is necessary for the ever-increasing water tightness that goes up a notch every year. You may not agree that it's worth it, and may not be concerned with water-tightness. But it's hardly pointless.
When you are paying $1000+ for a pocketable device, many people make this a large concern.
I do agree with what you said about analysts and Apple.
The decline of Apple can be more than just its financial success. Also, I'm pretty sure the main reason for the increase in iPhone prices is due to a lack of increase in sales, and they had to make sure their profits from iPhone did not decrease.
The iMac Pro starts at $5000. That is more than almost every PowerMac and Mac Pro model ever.
In the case of removing ports, I was referring to all Apple products. The removal of USB-A on MacBooks is not needed yet. I can understand phasing older tech out that is already on the way out, but USB-A was an industry standard in 2015-16, and still is for the most part. The removal of the headphone jack on iPhone is more understandable, as it helps keep water out. This is a trade off. Having a water-sealed phone is practical, not having an industry standard port on a professional computer is not.
[doublepost=1543982071][/doublepost]
I thought I was on Quora for a second, where every question is based on a false premise.
Apple has made some really great products over the years. Some real crap too. Today is no different. I’d argue that for the most part they are getting more products right now than in the past.
The fact that I stated in the thread that people are right now saying Apple is starting a decline is not a false premise. The topic is up for everyone's consideration, if you believe that Apple has not declined, that is your opinion and you're welcome to have it. There could be someone who responds to this and says Apple has been on a decline since they made the Apple III, that's an opinion as well. Although I did give my opinion on the topic in my original post, the question is up to everyone else to answer. Now I was going to add more selected common opinions which would have included abstain, but Snow Leopard and Firefox do not like me so I forgot in the 25 minutes it took me to write this due to freezing...
[doublepost=1543983093][/doublepost]
Aside from prices getting a bit too high I really don't see any decline... Lets not forget it was a couple of months ago that Apple reached the $1T mark... I guess in relation to that they have declined a bit. Many of your points aren't really that big of a deal.. You are right, the iMac Pro isn't for the common man, it wasn't intended to be. iOS to me is in a really good spot especially with iOS 12. This seems like it has been the most stable release ever. Could it use an updated version for iPads? Yeah.
Sure they aren't making routers and servers. That sucks for those that liked those products, but at the end of the day if they were actually selling well they would still be selling them today. Aside from the iPhone how have they really been innovative? I would call the AirPods and Watch innovative, but it wasn't like they came up with some brand new idea. I think the X models with Face ID are innovative, but I guess thats more just an improvement on the current models. In general they typically take a piece of tech and just make it better. Smartphones existed before iPhones but iPhone improved it. Smartwatches existed before the Apple Watch, but again the Apple Watch improved it. Tablets existed before the iPad, but again the iPad improved it.
The biggest gripe with Apple in the last few years at least has been price and I think they are reaching a point where they need to reel it in a bit. iPads and Apple Watches increased in price this year. iPhone added an even more expensive model. IMO, each device is $100 higher than it should be.
iOS 12 is better than the god-awful mess of 11, but it still has problems. The UX is mismatched across apps, compare the app store to the iTunes store for example. The iPad needs its own OS at this point, perhaps something more akin to macOS, as it is a very powerful piece of hardware but that is not being taken advantage of by iOS. Not in the slightest.
What each person defines as innovation varies. But to most, Apple just improves now instead of re-invent. MP3 players existed before the iPod, but the iPod was a completely new way of doing it. The iPhone expanded the smartphone far beyond what it was in 2007. It was nothing like anything else. iOS was also a very different OS to the others.
The Apple watch is a smartwatch, just an Apple smartwatch. (I know near nothing about smartwatches so I cannot compare it as well to prior products, but I think the smartwatches before the Apple watch were very similar.)AirPods were closer to innovation, but they shared the design and tech with existing products.
You're exactly right on Apple products all being $100 too expensive. Of course their prices on memory are just out of this world, way beyond a $100 difference. I think Apple is going to have to back down a bit, I don't see people taking this much longer.