When logo's look alike...

[MagicWok]

About a year old, so appologies if you have seen this before, you should get a kick out of this however:

http://www.logodesignlove.com/similar-original-logos

 

[Consultant]

Interesting. Thanks. Well somehow there aren't duplicates of crappy logos...

 

[Tilpots]

I thought the LA Lakers and LA Clippers similarities were funny. Could either claim ignorance?

 

[opeter]

You did forget to show the "old/new" Quark logo, that were used in 2005 for some months only... than, they changed it

--------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/09/14/new_quark_logo/
http://www.creativepro.com/article/sometimes-a-logo-is-just-a-logo


--------------------------------------------------------------


The Quark logo evolution:
http://www.creativepro.com/article/a-new-new-logo-quark

 

[NXTMIKE]

wow, thanks for the link.
It was especially funny to read a good chunk of the Simplebits logo vs. Logomaid one on the Flickr thread http://www.flickr.com/photos/simplebitsdan/429265591/.

 

[ezekielrage_99]

That's what happens when people (specifically arrogant management) decide not to test a logo...

I've seen it time and time again on projects, but that link is a very nice find I am bookmarking it now.

 

[MacBoobsPro]

All of Quarks stuff looks like they've been designed by a student. Typical Quark crap!

 

[ezekielrage_99]

All of Quarks stuff looks like they've been designed by a student. Typical Quark crap!

Or maybe Crowdsourced?