Thanks. It is relatively outdated compared with the E5-2687w.
Thanks. It is relatively outdated compared with the E5-2687w.
Stil performs extremely well, the new E5 chips are between 1 and 2 times faster, depending on what your doing. But the average performance difference is about 15%.
Stil performs extremely well, the new E5 chips are between 1 and 2 times faster, depending on what your doing. But the average performance difference is about 15%.
Is there any possibility to get this E5-2687w working in a MP4.1?
If Sandy Birdges are working in all other Macs, there must be somehow a possibility to include that in a MP firmware, or not?
Is there any possibility to get this E5-2687w working in a MP4.1?
If Sandy Birdges are working in all other Macs, there must be somehow a possibility to include that in a MP firmware, or not?
Stil performs extremely well, the new E5 chips are between 1 and 2 times faster, depending on what your doing. But the average performance difference is about 15%.
There is 0 chance of this. It's not a firmware thing. These use a completely different socket and chipset. Westmere and Nehalem were compatible. Anything after that is 100% non compliant.
*facepalm*
Thanks, sometimes I'm too stupid to live.
Stil performs extremely well, the new E5 chips are between 1 and 2 times faster, depending on what your doing. But the average performance difference is about 15%.
...On the product website, it only mentions the 12-core and Quad-core systems. .
1-2 times faster? Am I missing something? Wouldn't that be 100-200% faster! Or is that 1x = nothing/ same, 2x = 100% faster? All are wrong except the 15% faster average.
When I was looking at the benchmarks there are a few specialist cases, for example, something like AES encryption/decryption performance which is MUCH faster than the W3680 chips due to dedicated circuitry.
Example: http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/core-i7-3930k-3820-test-benchmark,review-32336-6.html - Graph 4.
And directly under graph 4 is the text ....
" ... In my Sandy Bridge-E review, we figured out that the AES256 throughput of Intel’s AES-NI-equipped CPUs is tied directly to memory bandwidth. With only four cores mated to a quad-channel DDR3-1600 subsystem, the -3820 rises right to the top of our Cryptography results. ..."
The W3680 has the dedicated circuitry.
"AES New Instructions YES"
http://ark.intel.com/products/47917...W3680-(12M-Cache-3_33-GHz-6_40-GTs-Intel-QPI)
The fact that E5's have 4 memory controllers , better/faster internal ring bus, and higher RAM speeds are the primary differentiating factors. The instructions work so fast that if you have more cores lit up with them you can outstrip the memory bandwidth.
It is not too hard to compose AES circuitry to en/decrypts as fast as you can pass bytes through the encoder. Basically "live streaming". So it boils down to how fast can stream bytes from memory.