Yeah would be useful. I hoped the digital crown have Touch ID. But since the sport edition don't have a glass covered crown I think it will not have Touch ID included..
That would be awkward to use. It is something I would expect from Samsung.
+1.
Not elegant at all.
Why would you want a flashlight from the crown when you could have the whole screen lit up by an app?
Hands free flash light for opening doors at night, working, etc...
Why would you need touchID on a watch that already detects your unique heartbeat signature?![]()
+1.
Not elegant at all.
Why would you want a flashlight from the crown when you could have the whole screen lit up by an app?
You know how powerful a custom made white LED can be, compared to a dull screen?
So bright you'd temporarily blind yourself.
But yes, it would kill the battery I guess.
So now it's too bright for being flashlight? lol. I heard all kind of things now. Yeah I guess I'd turn it on just to look at it. lol.
Why would you need touchID on a watch that already detects your unique heartbeat signature?![]()
Why would you need touchID on a watch that already detects your unique heartbeat signature?![]()
because you could actually use the watch wearing hand and illuminate the area you are working on, versus aiming your arm at target (losing the hand as an option to use).
Battery drain? I only imagine people would use the flashlight function for a mere minute or so a day, only when needed... not as a flashlight to read a book at night.
...idea just popped in my head so I photoshopped the pic. I agree, its a little gimmicky but I think there would be some value at times.
When you have a minute, just watch your wrist and hand. Your hand would be in the way of the light....
Then we'd get incessant complaints from lefties.
No, I never said that.
Someone said why bother, just use the screen and I was pointing out a LED light can be MILES brighter than the screen.
The brighter the better of course![]()
That band is really growing on my.