Having spent alot of time working and helping out in video production, I've grown accustom to seeing professional-quality lenses costing anywhere from 20 to 60k ALONE - never mind the camera body. These lenses usually are equipped with an autofocus motor, manual focus ring etc., and have (approximate) focal lengths of abooout 28mm-200/300mm..
My question is, when compared to, say, a high-end DSLR zoom lens, video lenses are still several times more expensive. In fact, the most expensive DSLR lens I've seen around is the ~$8000 Canon 600mm, whereas any standard Sony TV Xcam comes equipped with a $25,000 lens..
Am I missing something here, or are video lenses somehow "better quality"? Thanks if anyone can help me out .
My question is, when compared to, say, a high-end DSLR zoom lens, video lenses are still several times more expensive. In fact, the most expensive DSLR lens I've seen around is the ~$8000 Canon 600mm, whereas any standard Sony TV Xcam comes equipped with a $25,000 lens..
Am I missing something here, or are video lenses somehow "better quality"? Thanks if anyone can help me out .