I tried to make my IPP 12.9 a MBP replacement but it did not work well. I see the performance of the new device is impressive but the OS is still a limited iPad OS. With such powerful hardware, why don't they make the new iPP to run Mac OS?
It seems like today was only the first half of the announcement. It's a chicken or the egg problem ... release the hardware or software first? If you release the software first, the hardware doesn't exist to take advantage of it, so Apple had to release the M1 iPads first then follow it up with software-related changes later. This is classic Apple playbook. UWB chip is another that comes to mind - how many years did they let those languish in devices?
Haven’t we been saying that every year?Maybe iOS 15 will take advantage.
Final Cut Pro X and Logic Pro X?I tried to make my IPP 12.9 a MBP replacement but it did not work well. I see the performance of the new device is impressive but the OS is still a limited iPad OS. With such powerful hardware, why don't they make the new iPP to run Mac OS?
not only that, but full fat display support, with multiple windows both on the iPad and on the monitor, only supported on the M1 proFinal Cut Pro X and Logic Pro X?
Wait for iPadOS 15Haven’t we been saying that every year?
Wait for iOS 11
Wait for iOS 12
Wait for iPadOS
Wait for iPadOS 14
I really like the new iPads but to be honest then (for me) there is nothing I am missing out on until Apple puts out a much better OS and quits relying so hard on 3rd party to compensate for their lack of 1st party apps.
Bottom line, iPad gets interesting when apple gets interested. (Which will hopefully happen at WWDC)
I’d be tickled pink if we only got Windows 10 on iPad through Parallels or another virtualization product.Why do so many think MacOS is ever going to come to the iPads? It's never going to happen. We might see some unified OS in a few years where the two are one in the same, but it won't be MacOS as we know it now.
What's interesting is that the mobile Photoshop is built from the same code base as the desktop version - why cripple it to begin with?With the M1 I am praying devs are that already been designing apps for the macs with M1 will be able to slide over apps on the iPad with ease and hopefully run close to the desktop experience. I know Adobe already has Photoshop and Illustrator for the iPad but they are pretty crippled so I am praying they can export the M1 version of photoshop and other apps to the iPad and we can start to get full featured desktop software apps on the iPad.
That’s less an M1 vs A14 thing and more a touch vs keyboard+mouse thing. It’ll likely take Adobe some time to make Photoshop and the rest of the Creative Cloud suite touch-fluent.With the M1 I am praying devs are that already been designing apps for the macs with M1 will be able to slide over apps on the iPad with ease and hopefully run close to the desktop experience. I know Adobe already has Photoshop and Illustrator for the iPad but they are pretty crippled so I am praying they can export the M1 version of photoshop and other apps to the iPad and we can start to get full featured desktop software apps on the iPad.
I don’t know about virtualizing Windows on an iPad. A virtualization feature would be handy for software development (think a version of node.js bundled with NPM that could be used for local development on the iPad, it can even be a fairly locked down virtualization environment for that). But I’d be more inclined to just remote into a Windows box than try to shoehorn a full Windows install (even ARM Windows) onto an iPad, seems more useful to buy a cheap Windows 10 box. Saves battery that way, too.I’d be tickled pink if we only got Windows 10 on iPad through Parallels or another virtualization product.