Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

boomboom2

macrumors regular
Original poster
Apr 12, 2012
116
0
I almost switched from Chrome to Safari but one big thing is keeping me from it. For some reason whenever I go back or forward in the browser Safari feels like it needs to reload the entire page. It's really annoying having to wait before I can start scrolling and using the page!
 

ijha

macrumors regular
Aug 20, 2009
109
0
I almost switched from Chrome to Safari but one big thing is keeping me from it. For some reason whenever I go back or forward in the browser Safari feels like it needs to reload the entire page. It's really annoying having to wait before I can start scrolling and using the page!

That's why I came back to Chrome again :(
 

soloer

macrumors 6502a
Sep 27, 2004
883
202
Omaha
This is the only thing I really dislike with Safari. I switch to Firefox or Chrome when it really bugs me, but usually go back to Safari after I forget how irritated it made me.
 

boomboom2

macrumors regular
Original poster
Apr 12, 2012
116
0
It they ever fix that I'll switch to Safari. At least until they polish Chrome's performance which is highly likely.
 

Hephaestus

macrumors 6502
Apr 4, 2010
356
13
Thats because you've got it set to have that stupid sliding animation where the pages slide on and off. If you change the trackpad setting of "swipe between pages" to 3 fingers, it no longer does that. Going backwards and forwards is lightening fast and you know longer see that tedious animation.
 

Attachments

  • 2012-08-02 12.16.51 pm.png
    2012-08-02 12.16.51 pm.png
    261.2 KB · Views: 506

hafr

macrumors 68030
Sep 21, 2011
2,743
9
Thats because you've got it set to have that stupid sliding animation where the pages slide on and off. If you change the trackpad setting of "swipe between pages" to 3 fingers, it no longer does that. Going backwards and forwards is lightening fast and you know longer see that tedious animation.

A word of warning though. With two fingers, a swipe to the right brings you back and to the left brings you forward. But with three fingers, it's the opposite.
 

Hephaestus

macrumors 6502
Apr 4, 2010
356
13
A word of warning though. With two fingers, a swipe to the right brings you back and to the left brings you forward. But with three fingers, it's the opposite.

That's true but I prefer it that way, I upgraded from Snow Leopard and that is how its always been. You swipe left to go back and right to go forward.. as it should be. That is before all this "natural scrolling" nonsense came into existence.
 

boomboom2

macrumors regular
Original poster
Apr 12, 2012
116
0
Thats because you've got it set to have that stupid sliding animation where the pages slide on and off. If you change the trackpad setting of "swipe between pages" to 3 fingers, it no longer does that. Going backwards and forwards is lightening fast and you know longer see that tedious animation.

Eh, I tried this and it still reloads every page. Oh well.
 

hafr

macrumors 68030
Sep 21, 2011
2,743
9
Eh, I tried this and it still reloads every page. Oh well.

Actually, it doesn't reload the page. You have to press cmd+r in order for the page to be refreshed... It's just the blue thingy in the address bar that flashes, but it does nothing.
 

Gemütlichkeit

macrumors 65816
Nov 17, 2010
1,276
0
Seems like they would rather not refresh the page since it in theory would load faster.

This def needs to be a toggle.
 

dcorban

macrumors 6502a
Oct 29, 2007
915
30
I understand the frustration. When you are quickly browsing around, especially on forums, you expect to go back then be able to scroll down immediately. As it is, you must wait a second for the page to "load".
 

mabaker

macrumors 65816
Jan 19, 2008
1,215
580
It doesn't always do this, though. Some pages seem to be programmed to allow to come back "unscathed". It may be an HTML programming issue.å
 

WAYLIFE

macrumors newbie
Aug 22, 2012
3
5
AGREED!!! Safari refresh/reload/rewhatever is STUPID swiping back...

Apples own website is the WORST offender of this "feature". But so many websites react to the browser with this STUPID refresh effect. We want to go back to where we WERE, not back to the top of the page we are coming back to.

No other browser does this. There should not need to be a workaround, sliding more or less fingers than the default setting, etc...

:apple: Apple PLEASE MAKE SAFARI NORMAL!!! Forget more features, just make it work the basics correctly and to a standard. PLEASE!!! :apple:

:mad:
 

Hephaestus

macrumors 6502
Apr 4, 2010
356
13
Apples own website is the WORST offender of this "feature". But so many websites react to the browser with this STUPID refresh effect. We want to go back to where we WERE, not back to the top of the page we are coming back to.

No other browser does this. There should not need to be a workaround, sliding more or less fingers than the default setting, etc...

:apple: Apple PLEASE MAKE SAFARI NORMAL!!! Forget more features, just make it work the basics correctly and to a standard. PLEASE!!! :apple:

:mad:

Read my post, that fixed the problem.
 

kappaknight

macrumors 68000
Mar 5, 2009
1,595
91
Atlanta, GA
Apples own website is the WORST offender of this "feature". But so many websites react to the browser with this STUPID refresh effect. We want to go back to where we WERE, not back to the top of the page we are coming back to.

No other browser does this. There should not need to be a workaround, sliding more or less fingers than the default setting, etc...

:apple: Apple PLEASE MAKE SAFARI NORMAL!!! Forget more features, just make it work the basics correctly and to a standard. PLEASE!!! :apple:

:mad:

In addition to venting here, please submit a bug report to Apple. I will be doing the same.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.