Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Retskrad

macrumors regular
Original poster
Apr 1, 2022
200
672
The Magic Keyboars for the iPad Air/Pro is a great keyboard and the trackpad is just as accurate as the MacBooks. However, what brings it down significantly is the fact that it’s not solid state like the Macs. You need to apply twice as much pressure down to get a click compared to the Mac. Sure, you can enable tap to click in Settings but the vibration you get from the Taptic Engine on the Macs is a big reason why it’s superior to other laptops. Apple has disabled tap to click on both Mac and iPadOS for a reason: they want you to press down and get that vibration.

The M1 MacBook Air is extremely thin around the trackpad area and somehow, someway, Apple managed to put a solid state trackpad in there. Why couldn’t they do the same for the Magic Keyboard for the iPad?
 
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris

madat42

macrumors 6502
Mar 25, 2011
326
128
Is it because there’s no room for a taptic/haptic engine in the keyboard cover? I do hate the deep physical clicks so I’ve enabled tap-to-click. But this doesn’t work for click and drag actions so I’ve resorted to just using the touchscreen to keep things quiet. Maybe Apple wants us to do it this way. 😆
 

darngooddesign

macrumors P6
Jul 4, 2007
18,362
10,114
Atlanta, GA
Is it because there’s no room for a taptic/haptic engine in the keyboard cover? I do hate the deep physical clicks so I’ve enabled tap-to-click. But this doesn’t work for click and drag actions so I’ve resorted to just using the touchscreen to keep things quiet. Maybe Apple wants us to do it this way. 😆
You can turn on tap to drag in accessibility > pointer controls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Virgilinsanity

VaruLV

macrumors 6502a
Mar 25, 2019
636
561
Because Apple are still obsessed with thinness, hence no room for haptic engines, additional ports and battery in MKB's base.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Retskrad

floral

macrumors 65816
Jan 12, 2023
1,011
1,234
Earth
Because Apple are still obsessed with thinness, hence no room for haptic engines, additional ports and battery in MKB's base.
To be fair, in this case thinness is a fair compromise. We have seen a few situations where thinness was prioritized over way more important things... but not everybody needs a Taptic Engine. Still, they should offer a thicker keyboard with that.
 

VaruLV

macrumors 6502a
Mar 25, 2019
636
561
To be fair, in this case thinness is a fair compromise. We have seen a few situations where thinness was prioritized over way more important things... but not everybody needs a Taptic Engine. Still, they should offer a thicker keyboard with that.
They made it think and I get why, however, in order to prevent iPad tipping over, they had to also make that keyboard artificially heavy on purpose.
Two models of magic keyboards would be nice, however, I dread thinking about how much would one with ports and battery cost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ludatyk

Retskrad

macrumors regular
Original poster
Apr 1, 2022
200
672
Tim Cook is primarily an iPad user and I am honestly shocked that he green-lit the atrocious trackpad on the Magic Keyboard. It’s not Apple- level quality at all. It belongs with mid-tier Windows laptops.
 
Last edited:

darngooddesign

macrumors P6
Jul 4, 2007
18,362
10,114
Atlanta, GA
Because Apple are still obsessed with thinness, hence no room for haptic engines, additional ports and battery in MKB's base.
Do you really want Apple to double the thickness and weight of the MK’s base? My 13” iPad combo is already heavy enough. What good are additional ports when the Smart Connector doesn’t support data?
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.