kcellup macrumors regular Original poster Sep 19, 2015 174 56 Sep 13, 2018 #1 if there was a 6.1” Xs model this decision would be so much easier! Reactions: Adelphos33 and determined09
kcellup macrumors regular Original poster Sep 19, 2015 174 56 Sep 13, 2018 #3 penajmz said: Cost? Click to expand... I don’t know. I would be ok if it followed the Xs price scale
penajmz macrumors 68040 Sep 11, 2008 3,797 4,029 New York City Sep 13, 2018 #4 kcellup said: I don’t know. I would be ok if it followed the Xs price scale Click to expand... I would say cost since they wanted a more affordable iPhone that a lot more people would buy with the X looks and features. The Xr hits the spot.
kcellup said: I don’t know. I would be ok if it followed the Xs price scale Click to expand... I would say cost since they wanted a more affordable iPhone that a lot more people would buy with the X looks and features. The Xr hits the spot.
iPhone Xcited macrumors regular Sep 13, 2017 131 69 Arizona Sep 13, 2018 #5 They already have plenty of 5.8 inch component inventory as well.
A Act3 macrumors 68020 Sep 26, 2014 2,372 2,831 USA Sep 13, 2018 #6 I'd like to know what the extra cost is for the 3D touch, the extra gig of ram, the oled, and the dual camera. Is the Xs the better deal?
I'd like to know what the extra cost is for the 3D touch, the extra gig of ram, the oled, and the dual camera. Is the Xs the better deal?
A Adelphos33 macrumors 68000 Mar 13, 2012 1,873 2,556 Sep 13, 2018 #7 Agree 100% - X/XS screen is too narrow, but MAX footprint is very large. The XR footprint/screen may be Goldilocks, but many would prefer it to have OLED and dual camera
Agree 100% - X/XS screen is too narrow, but MAX footprint is very large. The XR footprint/screen may be Goldilocks, but many would prefer it to have OLED and dual camera