No, HMB2 is expensive and lower power, which is why it makes sense in a limited power envelope (getting as much performance as possible in 50 W for the MacBook Pro 5600M). It would just cost extra money for little benefit in the iMac.
No, HMB2 is expensive and lower power, which is why it makes sense in a limited power envelope (getting as much performance as possible in 50 W for the MacBook Pro 5600M). It would just cost extra money for little benefit in the iMac.
Thanks for the correction. I know the Vega cards were more power hungry than Navi, but it looks like I incorrectly attributed too much to the memory change vs miniaturization/architecture changes. (I also hadn't noticed Apple had customized their 5600M to use HBM2).