anyone know why the MacBook Air only has 2GB of RAM? are they ever planning on increasing it to 4GB like the other MacBooks?
I think people who buy MBAs don't need it for too much more than basic Keynote presentations, email, browsing, and other simple things. That would be true of me, anyway. I just like the way it travels well. I do my real work on my iMac.
The air was designed for on the move extra ram reduces battery life. Tbh the performance of the air is very well balaced. More isn't always better.
The only time I've had an issue with 2GB is when I open a virtual machine. 2GB has handled everything else I've thrown at it over the last couple of years, and as a software developer I can tell you that Eclipse is not a lightweight bit of software.
same here. Virtual machines don't run very quickly, but they do run. I do some heavy data analysis in SPSS and Ram has never been a problem.
As for those that think it's because Apple is cheap... you are simply wrong. Have you ever looked inside a MBA??? ram manufacturers just released chips with the density to fit four gb in the same space as two. There is simply no room inside the MBA for twice as many ram chips.
It would have cost Apple maybe $20 more for each computer to add more RAM (using higher density). I'd have been willing to pay maybe $50 to $100 for that increase. Apple would still be making a bit from it.
The space on the circuit board is very limited. Apple at the time only had certain memory chips to fit in that space. They managed to squeeze like 8 pieces of those in that space maximising the memory to 2 GB. They could have used double sided but that would make the design more difficult as well as increase the thickness of the device. Like coast1ja already explained this is a technical limitation Apple couldn't overcome. With newer higher density chips they might be able to up it to 4 GB but then you have a new discussion. The MacBook Air is meant to be a device for on the road for stuff like Office, mail, etc. and not for scientific calculations and virtualisation (though that is possible). That's why it has a slow but low voltage cpu and uses those tiny 1.8" hdd/ssd's. The 2 GB of memory is enough for this kind of work. The only thing that is off is the battery that has only 50% of the capacity of the MacBook and MacBook Pro making those machines better suited in this area for road use. Apple really should address this in whatever way.It would have cost Apple maybe $20 more for each computer to add more RAM (using higher density). I'd have been willing to pay maybe $50 to $100 for that increase. Apple would still be making a bit from it.
Design at the time and that 2GB was the norm. That said?
The poster that said Apple was cheap may be on to something though...
Cheap? I think greedy is more apropos.
I think people who buy MBAs don't need it for too much more than basic Keynote presentations, email, browsing, and other simple things. That would be true of me, anyway. I just like the way it travels well. I do my real work on my iMac.
Folks-
I am pretty sure that there are 16x1Gb (bit not byte -- 1 byte = 8 bits) memory chips soldered onto the motherboard (8 per side). I am guessing Apple could very easily move from 1Gb to 2Gb chips, but cost or physical size might be conspiring against us (most likely cost). I doubt the power penalty would be much (I could be off base). Maybe heat? Dunno. I still tend to fall back on cost as being the issue.
Actually, I've just had a look at the teardown at ifixit and you're right, there are 16 chips, not 8. So it would cost Apple about $20 extra to sell an MBA with 4GB of RAM.
I really hope they can find some way to fit some memory slots in the next MBA so that they can carry on selling 2GB MBAs but have CTO options for 4 and 8GB.
I agree, it would be nice to have a CTO for the memory, I would rather have 8gb of ram instead of a SSD hard drive . . . but thats just me . . .
-iGrant