Why use Image Capture over Finder?

[Siderz]

On my new Mac, Image Capture opens automatically when I plug in a memory stick.

This wasn't happening on my old one, and I've never opened Image Capture.

I would always just import pictures and video via Finder...why bother using another application to import pictures?

It seems I can't even preview pictures in Image Capture at full screen...

 

[GGJstudios]

I just use Finder, Quick Look and Preview for pics.

 

[Siderz]

I just use Finder, Quick Look and Preview for pics.

Exactly! Why on Earth does Image Capture exist? It looks pointless to me.

 

[maflynn]

I use LightRoom not Finder because that's where my photos get imported too.

 

[grapes911]

Exactly! Why on Earth does Image Capture exist? It looks pointless to me.

It allows you to import images from dives, scanners, cameras, networks, etc. without all the overhead of iPhoto or other apps. There is also some awesome Automator routines that can be used to automatically import images.

 

[GGJstudios]

Exactly! Why on Earth does Image Capture exist? It looks pointless to me.

Like any app, some may like it; some may not. Just disable it from launching if you don't want to use it.

Disable auto launch of iTunes/iPhoto/ImageCapture on connecting iDevice to Mac

 

[maflynn]

Exactly! Why on Earth does Image Capture exist? It looks pointless to me.

It allows you to import images from dives, scanners, cameras, networks, etc. without all the overhead of iPhoto or other apps. There is also some awesome Automator routines that can be used to automatically import images.

My scanner has since stopped providing updated applications and now it tells its customers to use Image Capture. So in a sense it I have to use it for my scanner but as I mentioned I don't use it for importing images

 

[grapes911]

My scanner has since stopped providing updated applications and now it tells its customers to use Image Capture. So in a sense it I have to use it for my scanner but as I mentioned I don't use it for importing images

I don't blame them. Why maintain an app when Apple will do it for them? Image Capture is easy to use. It's a really good app.

 

[GGJstudios]

I don't blame them. Why maintain an app when Apple will do it for them? Image Capture is easy to use. It's a really good app.

I guess I fail to see why it's better than simply dragging and dropping images using Finder.

 

[FSMBP]

I guess I fail to see why it's better than simply dragging and dropping images using Finder.

To get photos/videos off your iPhone, you can do it via Image Capture (and not Finder). I don't want to sync or use iPhoto (bloatware for me). If I recorded a long video on my iPhone and just want to have it on my Mac, Image Capture is very straight-forward on getting the video without any hassle.

 

[grapes911]

I guess I fail to see why it's better than simply dragging and dropping images using Finder.

It does more than just allow you to import images from a drive. It imports images from pretty much any source (even scanners, iPhones, network drives) and rarely needs drivers to support these actions. Add in Automator hooks and the ability to use IC with AppleScript and it's sweet tool. Most users might never use it (except for maybe scanning) though.

Years ago I worked in a visual communication lab at a college and I wrote all sorts of apps using IC to import and backup images from computers to servers. It really became my go-to tool for such tasks. Since I stopped working at that lab, I really haven't had much of a need for it.

 

[Siderz]

It allows you to import images from dives, scanners, cameras, networks, etc. without all the overhead of iPhoto or other apps. There is also some awesome Automator routines that can be used to automatically import images.

Why bother having another application open up when you can just use what's already open; Finder?

Automator routines sounds good though. I've only been able to use Automator to rename a batch of files, I'd love to put it through its paces one day.

 

[benwiggy]

I guess I fail to see why it's better than simply dragging and dropping images using Finder.

Because it does a lot more than that. I use it as the scanning interface for my EPSON scanner. IC allows me to control all the parameters of the scanner directly.

However, it should be possible to stop it from launching when you plug in a "memory stick". Presumably not every USB flash drive? But if OS X thinks the stick is a camera's memory card, then you can control that from iPhoto's preferences.

 

[GGJstudios]

To get photos/videos off your iPhone, you can do it via Image Capture (and not Finder). I don't want to sync or use iPhoto (bloatware for me). If I recorded a long video on my iPhone and just want to have it on my Mac, Image Capture is very straight-forward on getting the video without any hassle.

I just use Dropbox for getting pics/videos from my iPhone. It works whether I'm plugged in or not, no matter where I am.

I use it as the scanning interface for my EPSON scanner.

My scanner came with its own app, which works extremely well for me. I guess if someone didn't have such an app, IC would be useful.

 

[Bear]

I guess I fail to see why it's better than simply dragging and dropping images using Finder.

How do you drag and drop from a scanner? That's what Image Capture is for and for the few cameras that don't offer drag and drop. iOS devices for instance don't allow you to access the photos on them from finder.

However, for SD/CF/etc cards, I do agree that finder tends to be much easier to use.

 

[Siderz]

To get photos/videos off your iPhone, you can do it via Image Capture (and not Finder). I don't want to sync or use iPhoto (bloatware for me). If I recorded a long video on my iPhone and just want to have it on my Mac, Image Capture is very straight-forward on getting the video without any hassle.

It would be really useful if Apple would just allow us to show the iOS device in Finder.

That's what happens on Windows Explorer.

 

[grapes911]

Why bother having another application open up when you can just use what's already open; Finder?

Because it does way more than finder. As I said, finder just allows you to copy files. It's not an image importer where you can sync images and grab from multiple source.

I just use Dropbox for getting pics/videos from my iPhone. It works whether I'm plugged in or not, no matter where I am.

I use Dropbox as well, but not everyone wants their images in the cloud.

 

[maflynn]

I don't blame them. Why maintain an app when Apple will do it for them? Image Capture is easy to use. It's a really good app.

Unfortunately the app was much more flexible and powerful then image capture - its a step down They still maintain a windows version so now all my scanning needs are done by way of windows and synced up through dropbox

 

[grapes911]

Unfortunately the app was much more flexible and powerful then image capture - its a step down They still maintain a windows version so now all my scanning needs are done by way of windows and synced up through dropbox

Ouch. What features did they eliminate?

 

[GGJstudios]

How do you drag and drop from a scanner?

As I said, my scanner came with its own app.

It would be really useful if Apple would just allow us to show the iOS device in Finder.

That's what happens on Windows Explorer.

This may help: iExplorer

I use Dropbox as well, but not everyone wants their images in the cloud.

I understand. I don't make my default image folder public. I only use it to sync between my phone and Mac. I manually select images and put them in another folder if I want to share them with others.

 

[fisherking]

imagecapture IS great for reasons mentioned above, and easy to disable if you don't want to use it.

i take pics for work regularly, and don't want them in my (personal) iPhoto..i drag from the IC window to a folder on my desktop. done.

 

[maflynn]

Ouch. What features did they eliminate?

Mostly the PDF capabilities particularly in scanning multiple documents. Scannign profiles for scanning images versus documents including descreening and unsharp masks.