Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

nquinn

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jun 25, 2020
829
621
Such a bizarre choice.

Of devices with the M2 chip, the new iPad pro got wi-fi 6e, but the macbooks only kept wi-fi 6? And the new TV 4k kept basic wi-fi 6 also?

I don't think it's that needed on the ipad/phone/etc, but the macbook should really get it for faster backups to NAS's or other network drives.
 

fwmireault

macrumors 68020
Jul 4, 2019
2,288
9,704
Montréal, Canada
Apple didn’t announce its Mac updates yet, we will have to wait a few more weeks for that. Pretty sure that the M2 Pro/Max MBP will support Wifi 6E. For the Apple TV, it is just extra costs for Apple with little to no difference in real usage
 

nquinn

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jun 25, 2020
829
621
Apple didn’t announce its Mac updates yet, we will have to wait a few more weeks for that. Pretty sure that the M2 Pro/Max MBP will support Wifi 6E. For the Apple TV, it is just extra costs for Apple with little to no difference in real usage
Ya certainly possilble the new 14/16" models could get it w/ the M2 now.

Doesn't really matter for me since I'll keep my 2021 model for a long time.
 

estabya

macrumors 6502a
Jun 28, 2014
691
730
I would bet my house that it’ll be on the new MBPs since it is on the iPad Pros.
 
  • Like
Reactions: max2

LionTeeth

macrumors regular
Oct 8, 2022
207
415
I’m willing to bet maybe 5 people in your city have networking gear that does even wifi 6, let alone 6e. AC is even like Blu-ray to DVD still.
 
  • Like
Reactions: estabya

estabya

macrumors 6502a
Jun 28, 2014
691
730
I’m willing to bet maybe 5 people in your city have networking gear that does even wifi 6, let alone 6e. AC is even like Blu-ray to DVD still.

This. I can count on one hand the number of people I know with Wi-Fi 6E networking gear, and the only reason I know any is because I am an ex network admin who knows a lot of enthusiasts.

For 99% of use cases and people, 6 is already more than enough. It makes sense to me that it’d be relegated to the Pro devices for a while.
 

LionTeeth

macrumors regular
Oct 8, 2022
207
415
This. I can count on one hand the number of people I know with Wi-Fi 6E networking gear, and the only reason I know any is because I am an ex network admin who knows a lot of enthusiasts.

For 99% of use cases and people, 6 is already more than enough. It makes sense to me that it’d be relegated to the Pro devices for a while.
I can believe it. I’m a home enthusiast and I still don’t have anything 6 at all. My 5ghz UniFi network is working perfectly, no need to change anything out
 
  • Like
Reactions: estabya

estabya

macrumors 6502a
Jun 28, 2014
691
730
I can believe it. I’m a home enthusiast and I still don’t have anything 6 at all. My 5ghz UniFi network is working perfectly, no need to change anything out

I’m in the same position, still using a custom Wifi 5 system. I keep getting the itch to upgrade, but it’s far too little bang for the buck at this point. Especially since my use case wouldn’t see much/any performance improvement and so few devices support it anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LionTeeth

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,682
43,740
I don't think it's that needed on the ipad/phone/etc,
Why?

I can think of plenty of reasons on why having my iPad and phone Wifi 6e is a good thing. Its not just a positive for Macs.

Given that Apple has not refreshed the MBP line, lets wait and see what wifi they'll be using
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobcomer and progx

Sheepish-Lord

macrumors 68030
Oct 13, 2021
2,528
5,147
Apple still uses 2x2 MIMO on the 80Mhz channel so they bottle neck their stuff anyway. Wifi 6e is just another way to sell people crap in the name of future proofing. Call me when Apple starts using the 160Mhz channel for better throughput cause as of now it’s effectively a river funneled into a garden hose.
 

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,682
43,740
Wifi 6e is just another way to sell people crap
That's largely true, even in 2022 I don't think 6E adoption is all that high, but I only have antidotal evidence, i.e., what I see in terms of public hotspots and enterprise hotspots.
 

JPack

macrumors G5
Mar 27, 2017
13,542
26,163
I assumed they’d just jump to 7 so the iPad Pro with 6E is quite the surprise to me.

Apple uses Broadcom and Broadcom is still sampling Wifi 7 chips. It usually takes 18-24 months after Broadcom launch before Apple adopts the chip.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert

JPack

macrumors G5
Mar 27, 2017
13,542
26,163
Such a bizarre choice.

Of devices with the M2 chip, the new iPad pro got wi-fi 6e, but the macbooks only kept wi-fi 6? And the new TV 4k kept basic wi-fi 6 also?

I don't think it's that needed on the ipad/phone/etc, but the macbook should really get it for faster backups to NAS's or other network drives.

Apple is trying to make a $99 TV, so cost is important. They cut out the Ethernet chip itself and the charging cable, so Wifi 7 is completely out of the question.
 

thenewperson

macrumors 6502a
Mar 27, 2011
992
912
Apple uses Broadcom and Broadcom is still sampling Wifi 7 chips. It usually takes 18-24 months after Broadcom launch before Apple adopts the chip.
Oh yeah, I’m aware. I just thought they’d stick with Wi-Fi 6 until 7 was ready. Glad to see that’s not the case.
 

thenewperson

macrumors 6502a
Mar 27, 2011
992
912
Apple is trying to make a $99 TV, so cost is important. They cut out the Ethernet chip itself and the charging cable, so Wifi 7 is completely out of the question.
I do hope they do manage to get it down to $99. Getting back to that price point for a good-enough Apple TV (hopefully with Thread radio too) would be nice.
 

magbarn

macrumors 68040
Oct 25, 2008
3,018
2,386
Live in a Wi-Fi congested area and 6E has been a Godsend for my PCs. I’m getting faster than 1gb ethernet on transfers now. Getting half the speed on plain Wi-Fi 6 on my macs. Would love 6E on my MBP despite the reduced range.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nquinn

nquinn

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jun 25, 2020
829
621
Live in a Wi-Fi congested area and 6E has been a Godsend for my PCs. I’m getting faster than 1gb ethernet on transfers now. Getting half the speed on plain Wi-Fi 6 on my macs. Would love 6E on my MBP despite the reduced range.

Ya, I really wish I could have gotten this on my ~ $3000 MBP 16". I badly needed a machine and just decided I'd have to live without it. I wasn't going to wait another year.
 

playtech1

macrumors 6502a
Oct 10, 2014
695
889
The lack of 6E on the M2 MacBook Air is a bit odd in the circumstances.

I think the move to 2x2 rather than 3x3 Wi-Fi is bigger deal though - it would be great if the Pro machines reverted to 'Pro' level Wi-Fi specs. Apple used to be ahead of the pack on this, now they are solidly mid-range.
 

nquinn

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jun 25, 2020
829
621
Apple is trying to make a $99 TV, so cost is important. They cut out the Ethernet chip itself and the charging cable, so Wifi 7 is completely out of the question.

Wi-fi 6e barely adds any cost on the client side though (considerable on router side).

Intel has offered a 6e AX210 chip for like 2+ years now at $20. Cost on the chip can't be that much more than a regular 6 chip.


Seems silly to not include - could be related to current supply levels. I doubt Apple's cost on a 6e vs 6 chip changes by more than $1-$2. On tight margins on an Apple TV OK, but not on a $2000-$3000 laptop.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy

nquinn

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jun 25, 2020
829
621
This. I can count on one hand the number of people I know with Wi-Fi 6E networking gear, and the only reason I know any is because I am an ex network admin who knows a lot of enthusiasts.

For 99% of use cases and people, 6 is already more than enough. It makes sense to me that it’d be relegated to the Pro devices for a while.

6E definitely isn't commonly deployed because routers/access points only now are becoming affordable for it. ($200ish now, used to be $450+).

But you're missing the point - 6E doesn't need to be deployed everywhere for it to be useful. It should be available in laptops ASAP because:

1. It's cheap to implement into clients (see above).
2. I could deploy a home 6e router to avoid congestion in busy apartments, or to increase large file copy speeds to a NAS/etc.

For many in urban areas high rise buildings have horrible congenstion and being able to be on the 6ghz band would really help. I wouldn't expect 6e to be used in most public locations for a long time or if ever (likely they would wait until wi-fi 7).
 

JPack

macrumors G5
Mar 27, 2017
13,542
26,163
Wi-fi 6e barely adds any cost on the client side though (considerable on router side).

Intel has offered a 6e AX210 chip for like 2+ years now at $20. Cost on the chip can't be that much more than a regular 6 chip.


Seems silly to not include - could be related to current supply levels. I doubt Apple's cost on a 6e vs 6 chip changes by more than $1-$2. On tight margins on an Apple TV OK, but not on a $2000-$3000 laptop.

Apple cut out the charging cable on the Apple TV to save a couple dollars. Wi-Fi 6E also requires a 6 GHz antenna. A dollar here and there adds up especially on a low margin device.

AirPods and Apple TV are both $129. It should be pretty obvious the bill of materials is much higher for the TV.
 

nquinn

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jun 25, 2020
829
621
Apple cut out the charging cable on the Apple TV to save a couple dollars. Wi-Fi 6E also requires a 6 GHz antenna. A dollar here and there adds up especially on a low margin device.

AirPods and Apple TV are both $129. It should be pretty obvious the bill of materials is much higher for the TV.
Ya like I said I could see it happening on the low margin TV device. Less so on the laptops.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.