Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Damolee

macrumors 6502a
Nov 20, 2012
558
102
Mystery I am looking into. I've got it enabled, and can still see the usual signal bars. Don't get many calls so wondering more about any idle drain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: monnyblack1

imlynxy

macrumors 65816
Mar 8, 2012
1,430
626
I compared Att and T-mo vowifi and I found that T-mo vowifi drains batteries faster than Att. Also I found that Att had a crispy quality , like HD volte, while T-mo had echo and worse quality, I can say GSM/CDMA quality.
I like T-mo more than Att as a company, but this is how it is.
I hope I'm wrong and my experiment is incorrect.
I didn't like use T-mo vowifi due to poor voice quality.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: monnyblack1

Mindcrime

macrumors regular
Oct 24, 2003
135
46
Houston, Texas
Is wifi calling free since it uses data and not regular voice?

Also, is it better than FaceTime audio. I usually call my wife overseas using FT audio; for quality, it's perfectly crystal clear. On LTE it uses about 20MB for 20 minutes of calling, so it's very data plan friendly.
 

Mindcrime

macrumors regular
Oct 24, 2003
135
46
Houston, Texas
[Redacted]

Bloody hell I have no idea how that happened. One minute I'm the Ulysses thread, then blammo! my post goes here.

Sorry!
 
Last edited:

Speedman100

macrumors 6502
Jul 21, 2013
435
388
I like bare bones mark down editors a lot -- got so sick of the bloated stuff like MS Word, which tries to be both a layout tool and a fancy "meets all needs" word processor. Markdown and full screen support are good enough for me for the composing stage. Whatever my editor or my producers need, I can easily convert to it.

I write screenplays in Highland (fountain markdown), then output to FDX when they get optioned and go into production. At first I thought the various markdown/anti-GUI apps were expensive. But, when I am forced to work on my Windows PC and I cannot find anything that comes remotely close to the ease of use and functionality my Mac apps, I want to pull my hair out. (For screenplays I will use Fade In, which is cross platform, but my 1st drafts are better served by Highland.)

All that said, Ulysses is a good app. It'a bit bloaty, and, at least on the iPad, how it handles remote connections like Dropbox (you can copy to ulysses, can't save out) is bizarre at times.

My go to apps are IA Writer (despite their earlier kerfuffle with version 2.0) and Highland. I use Ulysses for fiction, where it is good for breaking up scenes and chapters; it's certainly much simpler than Scrivener, which I kind of love and kind of hate.

That's a long 2 cents.
I think you posted in the wrong place.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.