colocolo said:
The neighbors Wi-Fi goes into his place, so its not the same as theft. If they want to broadcast a powerful signal, make it secure. If not, limit the range. It's not as if they don't have the tools. Why does anyone have to live with the neighbors electromagnetic frequencies inside their house without their consent?
If the signal leaves your premises, encrypt it. If you have to guess a password or hack it in any way, then and just then it is theft.
That may or may not be the legal case in some parts of the world but that doesn't make it right.
Obviously his EMF is entering their property too, has he asked permission? Has he asked his neighbour to limit thier EMF's reach?
Just because there's no password doesn't mean that it's not theft. What if I leave my car unlocked with the keys in, don't I have the right to expect you NOT to steal it?
It's because of people with this attitude of 'if I can do it then why shouldn't I do' that we need passwords and locks.
It reminds me of the Dennis Leary joke about California being the only US State with a law giving pedestrians the right of way at road crossings, every other State relies on common decency.
Go ahead and use your neighbours wireless connection but dont ever complain that someone has stolen your ID or hacked your data or stolen your car. You COULD have taken steps to stop them but obviously didnt.