Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

rstark18

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Sep 18, 2009
1,135
395
Something that has annoyed me for a while is that on my home network when I open WiFi in Settings, both of my 2.4ghz networks show instantly and my two 5ghz networks take up to 5 seconds to show up. There are no conflicts within the network setups (channels) and all four SSID's are named differently.
This happens on all of my iOS devices.
Any ideas?
 

rstark18

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Sep 18, 2009
1,135
395
Just forget 2.4 GHz ones

I have a few devices that use the 2.4 (printer, etc.). Regardless even if I turn the 2.4 off it still takes some time for the 5ghz to populate in settings.
The reason it annoys me is I have one router for the front half of the house and one for the back half. Sometimes my device is still hanging on to the other ssid and I have to manually switch over.
 

addamas

macrumors 65816
Apr 20, 2016
1,314
1,341
I wrote it wrong. On devices you want only 5GHz WiFi forget 2,4GHz WiFi, then they will only connect to right one. Other devices let connect to 2,4GHz. Since they have different Network names (SSID) it will be easy. Go to WiFi settings and forget network

I also had this problem with my local network, for some reason iPhone wanted to connect to 2,4GHz only when there was 5GHz one with same SSID.
 

rstark18

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Sep 18, 2009
1,135
395
I wrote it wrong. On devices you want only 5GHz WiFi forget 2,4GHz WiFi, then they will only connect to right one. Other devices let connect to 2,4GHz. Since they have different Network names (SSID) it will be easy. Go to WiFi settings and forget network

I also had this problem with my local network, for some reason iPhone wanted to connect to 2,4GHz only when there was 5GHz one with same SSID.

They are forgotten on my iOS devices. They are not connecting to the 2.4 it's just that in the list of available networks the 2.4 populates the list instantly whereas the 5 takes 5 seconds or so.
 

Julien

macrumors G4
Jun 30, 2007
11,859
5,445
Atlanta
If you are in another room or a few feet away from the WiFi router the 5GHz will be a weaker signal and can take more time to connect. 5GHz is mostly only useful in the same room or line of sight of the WiFi router.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio.emt

C DM

macrumors Sandy Bridge
Oct 17, 2011
51,392
19,461
If you are in another room or a few feet away from the WiFi router the 5GHz will be a weaker signal and can take more time to connect. 5GHz is mostly only useful in the same room or line of sight of the WiFi router.
That has basically been my experience as well.
 

deano1972

macrumors 6502a
Sep 16, 2016
557
239
United Kingdom
If you are in another room or a few feet away from the WiFi router the 5GHz will be a weaker signal and can take more time to connect. 5GHz is mostly only useful in the same room or line of sight of the WiFi router.
While its range is weaker than 2.4ghz if you need to be in the same room or line of site you may need a better router. I can get a decent signal in other rooms from my router on the 5ghz band
Cheers
[doublepost=1483143580][/doublepost]
Would assigning different channels or looking for interference help?
Absolutely .. using a clear channel always helps
 

C DM

macrumors Sandy Bridge
Oct 17, 2011
51,392
19,461
While its range is weaker than 2.4ghz if you need to be in the same room or line of site you may need a better router. I can get a decent signal in other rooms from my router on the 5ghz band
Cheers
[doublepost=1483143580][/doublepost]
Absolutely .. using a clear channel always helps
It can also depend on building materials and things if that nature. It's certainly known that 5 GHz penetration/range isn't as good as that of 2.4 GHz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio.emt

sinatik

macrumors member
Jul 20, 2016
77
40
Virginia
Just forget 2.4 GHz ones
Thanks, whenever I come home my iphone always connected to the 2.4, so I always had to check and reconnect to the 5 GHz. I did the forget for the 2.4 and now it always connects to 5G. Such a simple solution that I didn't think about.
 

RansZ28

macrumors regular
Sep 11, 2014
217
45
Gilbert AZ
You can attach to 2.4G on the phone so that the watch learns it, then attach to 5G on your phone. Watch will continue to use 2.4G that way.
But if I forget 2.4 then the AW will forget it too. iPhone will pick up whatever is strongest
 

planetf1

macrumors 6502a
Aug 8, 2014
565
209
Hampshire, UK
I guess it depends on router... Existence of signals... And country rules?

Certainly I get a delay on higher channels using a bt hh5a in the uk.
 

perezr10

macrumors 68020
Jan 12, 2014
2,014
1,486
Monroe, Louisiana
FYI, if you were to upgrade to a "mesh network" type of system like the eero there is no separate 2.4 or 5ghz networks. You only see one network and your device gets the fastest possible speed. Not having separate 2.4 and 5ghz networks is one of the best attributes of a mesh network.
 

Paco II

macrumors 68020
Sep 13, 2009
2,288
706
Shouldn't any router support that? If you use the same SSID for both 2.4 and 5, the device will use the 'better' signal and switch accordingly? That is what appears to happen with my network.

FYI, if you were to upgrade to a "mesh network" type of system like the eero there is no separate 2.4 or 5ghz networks. You only see one network and your device gets the fastest possible speed. Not having separate 2.4 and 5ghz networks is one of the best attributes of a mesh network.
 

rstark18

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Sep 18, 2009
1,135
395
I tried 36 (I was on 157) and didn't see any difference in delay. I'm in the US so neither of those channels are DFS anyway. I'm still on my quest to figure out why this is happening. Sane results from a Linksys e3000 and an Asus RT-N66U.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.