Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

corbywan

macrumors regular
Original poster
Feb 4, 2008
238
3
Forest Grove, OR
Is it possible to relay a wifi network over multiple hops/repeaters with Airport Expresses and/or DD-WRTs (or similar?)

Our church meets in a facility that is about four blocks away from our office (where the wifi is) and we need access to it during these meetings. It might sound desperate, but is it possible to put some kind of repeaters/extenders in strategically placed cars between points A and B to get the signal there?
 

Hellhammer

Moderator emeritus
Dec 10, 2008
22,164
582
Finland
Wouldn't it be better to use 3G? If anyone has iPhone, he can use it to tether the internet connection to a computer, or just buy the cheapest deal available on 3G connection
 

aicul

macrumors 6502a
Jun 20, 2007
809
7
no cars, only boats
If you created the initial wifi network and indicated that it can be extended, the apple airport products will help you do just that.

However putting them in "cars" may cause some interference.

I do believe there are dedicated (non-apple) aerials that may help you in .. one-hop!
 

belvdr

macrumors 603
Aug 15, 2005
5,945
1,372
Wouldn't it be better to use 3G? If anyone has iPhone, he can use it to tether the internet connection to a computer, or just buy the cheapest deal available on 3G connection

I second this. You may opt for something like the Verizon MiFi and just keep it at your location.
 

corbywan

macrumors regular
Original poster
Feb 4, 2008
238
3
Forest Grove, OR
Building mounted antena are not an option in our case. And 3G doesn't have the bandwidth and I'd rather not add to the monthly telcom budget. Plus we would like to keep on the same subnet.

Any other ideas?
 

corbywan

macrumors regular
Original poster
Feb 4, 2008
238
3
Forest Grove, OR
To clarify, one of the things we want to do is live audio/video streaming with something like QuickTime Streaming Server. It's much happier when the encoder and the server are on the same subnet, plus the obvious bandwidth benefit of something like wifi. 300KB over 90-120 minutes adds up.
 

belvdr

macrumors 603
Aug 15, 2005
5,945
1,372
To clarify, one of the things we want to do is live audio/video streaming with something like QuickTime Streaming Server. It's much happier when the encoder and the server are on the same subnet, plus the obvious bandwidth benefit of something like wifi. 300KB over 90-120 minutes adds up.

It seems like you would use WDS, but also know that for every "hop" in the chain, the bandwidth is effectively halved (i.e. one repeater = 1/2, two repeaters = 1/4, etc). You could end up with little to no bandwidth at all by the time you get to your destination.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.